Roblox

Roblox

AVERAGE FPS
89
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 89 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 47 53 58
1440p QHD 67 83 94 103
1080p Full HD 101 124 140 154

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 58
3840x2160 Medium 53
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Ultra 38
2560x1440 Low 103
2560x1440 Medium 94
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Ultra 67
1920x1080 Low 154
1920x1080 Medium 140
1920x1080 High 124
1920x1080 Ultra 101

Roblox with Intel Core i5-12400 + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the Intel Arc B370 delivers a playable but constrained experience in Roblox, with performance scaling that clearly identifies the integrated GPU as the primary bottleneck. Across the measured resolutions, the combo produces average frame rates ranging from 38 FPS at 4K Ultra to 154 FPS at 1080p Low, demonstrating that while the CPU has ample headroom, the graphics solution limits the experience at higher settings. The data indicates a system that can handle the game smoothly at lower resolutions and settings, but struggles to maintain high refresh rates when visual demands increase.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a steep performance curve that is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. At 1080p High, the combo averages 124 FPS, but this falls to 83 FPS at 1440p High—a reduction of 41 FPS—and further to 47 FPS at 4K High, a 77 FPS drop from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern shows that the Arc B370's rendering throughput diminishes rapidly as pixel count increases, with the 4K resolution costing roughly 62% of the 1080p High performance.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (154 FPS) and Ultra (101 FPS) is 53 FPS, whereas at 4K, the spread between Low (58 FPS) and Ultra (38 FPS) narrows to just 20 FPS. This compression at 4K indicates that the GPU is saturated even at Low settings, leaving little headroom for additional graphical features. The 4K Medium result of 53 FPS with a minimum of 45 FPS and maximum of 61 FPS shows noticeable variability, suggesting that the GPU is working near its limits.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is gentler—a 33% reduction in average FPS across settings—while the jump from 1440p to 4K is much harsher, with performance nearly halving. This non-linear degradation points to memory bandwidth constraints, as the Arc B370 uses System Shared memory with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent." The integrated nature of the GPU means it competes with the CPU for system memory bandwidth, and this contention becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions where each frame requires more data to be drawn.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global ranking of tested combinations for Roblox, this pairing sits at rank 2774 out of 3010 combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. This low percentile position reflects the Arc B370's limited graphics capabilities rather than any deficiency in the Core i5-12400, which ranks in the 72nd percentile among all CPUs. The stark contrast between the CPU's strong standing and the GPU's weak one (5th percentile among all GPUs) explains the combo's overall poor ranking.

The Arc B370's benchmark score of 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it near the bottom of the GPU hierarchy. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (scoring 1186, a 0.2% advantage), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, 0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, 0.7% ahead). These are all older or lower-tier parts, and the Arc B370 trails them by fractions of a percent. Only the AMD FirePro M2000 (1168) sits below it, with the Arc B370 holding a 1.4% advantage.

Given that the GPU falls within a 1.4% delta of its closest competitors, the ranking position of 2774 out of 3010 is consistent with a graphics solution that delivers entry-level performance. The CPU, by contrast, has nearest rivals like the AMD EPYC 7643 (0.1% faster), Intel Core i7-1355U (0.3% faster), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 (0.7% faster), while the Intel Core i3-14100F is 0.9% slower. This places the i5-12400 in a competitive mid-range position, but the combo's overall rank is dragged down entirely by the GPU's limitations.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor based on the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process. Its base clock is 300 MHz, boosting to 2400 MHz, and it contains 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation units. The GPU also includes 10 ray tracing cores, though Roblox does not heavily leverage this feature. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 6.144 TFLOPS.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, a 256-bit-class bus, and bandwidth that is "System Dependent." This architecture means the GPU's performance is intimately tied to the system's memory configuration and speed. The 25 W TDP and IGP slot width confirm this is a low-power integrated solution, not a discrete card. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 and 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs underscore its entry-level positioning.

In Roblox specifically, the GPU's 20 ROPs and 40 TMUs are sufficient for the game's relatively simple geometry and textures at lower settings, but they become overwhelmed as resolution and quality increase. The 4K Ultra result of 38 FPS with no recorded minimum or maximum suggests the GPU is consistently pegged at its limit. The 1080p Low result of 154 FPS shows that when the workload is light enough, the GPU can deliver respectable frame rates, but the headroom is quickly exhausted.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings produce an average of 154 FPS, Medium 140 FPS with a range of 119 to 161 FPS, High 124 FPS, and Ultra 101 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 53 FPS, and even at Ultra, the system maintains triple-digit frame rates, making 1080p the most viable resolution for smooth gameplay across all settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. Low averages 103 FPS, Medium 94 FPS with a range of 80 to 108 FPS, High 83 FPS, and Ultra 67 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 36 FPS, indicating that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor. The Medium setting's minimum of 80 FPS suggests that even mid-range settings can cause occasional dips below the 90 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles. Low averages 58 FPS, Medium 53 FPS with a range of 45 to 61 FPS, High 47 FPS, and Ultra 38 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is just 20 FPS, showing that at 4K, the GPU is saturated regardless of settings. The Medium result's minimum of 45 FPS and maximum of 61 FPS reveals significant frame time variance, which could manifest as visible stuttering in gameplay.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal configuration for this combo is 1080p with Medium settings, which delivers 140 FPS average with a minimum of 119 FPS and maximum of 161 FPS. This setting provides a substantial frame rate cushion above the 60 FPS threshold, while the minimum still exceeds 100 FPS, ensuring consistent smoothness. High settings at 1080p (124 FPS) are also viable, but Medium offers a better safety margin at no significant visual cost given the game's art style.

For users prioritizing visual quality, 1080p Ultra at 101 FPS is acceptable, though it sacrifices 39 FPS compared to Medium. At 1440p, Medium (94 FPS) is the recommended choice, as it stays above 80 FPS minimum and offers a balanced experience. The 1440p High setting (83 FPS) is playable but leaves less headroom for complex scenes. At 4K, no setting achieves a consistent 60 FPS; Low (58 FPS) is the closest, but Medium (53 FPS) with its recorded minimum of 45 FPS may cause noticeable dips. Users with 4K displays should consider 1440p rendering for a smoother experience.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S family, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and its 65 W TDP makes it an efficient desktop part. Its integrated UHD Graphics 730 is present but unused in this configuration, as the Arc B370 handles display output.

In Roblox, the CPU's performance is more than adequate. Its 3DMark scores show strong scaling from 2 threads (1692) to 8 threads (4745) and max threads (5890), indicating good multi-threading capabilities. Cinebench R23 results of 15989 multi-core and 2257 single-core place it well above the requirements for Roblox's physics and scripting workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 3456 and multi-thread score of 18747 further confirm the CPU's capability.

The bottleneck analysis is clear: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 154 FPS, but the CPU's theoretical ceiling is much higher based on its benchmark scores. The fact that performance degrades so significantly with resolution increases—from 154 FPS at 1080p Low to 58 FPS at 4K Low—proves that the GPU, not the CPU, is the limiting component. The CPU's 72nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 5th percentile makes this division of labor obvious.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and setting for this combo in Roblox?

A: The data shows 1080p Medium provides the best balance, with 140 FPS average, 119 FPS minimum, and 161 FPS maximum. This is the only configuration that maintains a minimum above 100 FPS while offering quality above Low.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Roblox?

A: At 4K, the highest average FPS is 58 on Low settings, while Ultra drops to 38 FPS. Medium achieves 53 FPS with a 45 FPS minimum. None of these meet a consistent 60 FPS target, so 4K is not recommended for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad. It is 0.2% slower than the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186), 0.5% slower than the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190), and 0.7% slower than the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192). It is 1.4% faster than the AMD FirePro M2000 (1168).

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400 the bottleneck in this system?

A: No. The CPU ranks in the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 5th percentile. The FPS drops from 154 at 1080p Low to 58 at 4K Low indicate GPU saturation, not CPU limitation.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, Low averages 154 FPS while Ultra averages 101 FPS, a difference of 53 FPS. The GPU can handle both, but the gap widens at higher resolutions, showing the GPU's limitations.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking for Roblox?

A: This combo ranks 2774 out of 3010 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 8% of systems. This low rank is driven by the GPU's 5th percentile performance rather than the CPU's 72nd percentile standing.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B370

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2400 MHz MHz
TDP 25 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + Intel Arc B370 in Roblox

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 58.0
3840x2160 Medium 53.0
3840x2160 High 47.0
3840x2160 Ultra 38.0
2560x1440 Low 103.0
2560x1440 Medium 94.0
2560x1440 High 83.0
2560x1440 Ultra 67.0
1920x1080 Low 154.0
1920x1080 Medium 140.0
1920x1080 High 124.0
1920x1080 Ultra 101.0

Roblox with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs

See how Roblox performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Roblox with Arc B370 + Other CPUs

See how Roblox performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400 + Arc B370

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.