Roblox

Roblox, a long-running sandbox title from 2006, continues to be a staple in the benchmark database due to its unique performance demands. This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the Intel Arc B390, a combination that yields a specific performance profile. The data shows a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics component, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The following sections break down the CPU and GPU roles, provide settings recommendations, and offer a detailed look at the measured frame rates.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Raphael. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This 5nm processor, manufactured by TSMC, has a 65W TDP and supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. The CPU's benchmark scores indicate strong single-threaded and multi-threaded capabilities; for instance, it scores 1852 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 12735 in multi-core. It holds a 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26324.

In the context of Roblox, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and script execution. The measured frame rates suggest that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at most settings. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 171 FPS, and at Ultra, it still produces 111 FPS. This indicates that the Ryzen 5 7600 provides ample processing headroom for the game's simulation tasks. The processor's high single-thread performance, evidenced by its 999 score in 3dmark single-thread, is particularly beneficial for a game like Roblox, which can be sensitive to single-core speed. The data shows that the CPU's performance is sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, as the frame rates scale predictably with settings changes. However, at 4K, the CPU's load becomes less relevant as the GPU becomes the limiting factor, a point elaborated in the resolution scaling section. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.2% faster) and the Intel Core i9-11900KF (0.4% slower), have nearly identical average scores, placing the Ryzen 5 7600 in a competitive performance tier. This parity suggests that the choice between these processors would yield similar results in CPU-bound scenarios within Roblox, but the actual frame rate cap in this test is determined by the GPU.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) from Intel, based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and part of the Arc Graphics-M generation (Panther Lake). It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. Critically, its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," meaning it relies on the system's DDR5 RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. This shared memory configuration has a significant impact on performance, especially in a game like Roblox that can have varying texture and asset demands. The GPU has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. Its theoretical performance is rated at 7.680 TFLOPS for FP32 and 15.36 TFLOPS for FP16. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Arc B390's benchmark presence is minimal, with a single 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482, placing it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. This low percentile is reflected in its nearest rivals, which include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1.3% slower) and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (2.7% slower). These are entry-level components from over a decade ago, underscoring the Arc B390's position as a low-performance graphics solution. In Roblox, this GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The measured FPS data shows that even at 1080p Low, the system only achieves 171 FPS, which is far below what the CPU could theoretically support. This is a classic sign of a GPU-limited scenario, where the graphics processor cannot keep up with the CPU's output. The lack of dedicated VRAM means that textures and frame buffers are stored in system memory, which introduces latency and bandwidth constraints, particularly at higher resolutions like 4K, where the framebuffer demands increase exponentially. The GPU's 80W TDP and integrated nature (IGP) further confirm its target market is entry-level or portable devices, not high-refresh-rate gaming.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired smoothness. The data provides average FPS for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets at three resolutions. At 1080p, the Medium preset yields an average of 155 FPS, which is a 15% drop from Low (171 FPS) but a 12% increase over High (137 FPS). Given that the Medium preset also includes a minimum FPS measurement of 132, it offers a good balance of visual fidelity and performance. High at 1080p delivers 137 FPS, which is still smooth, but the jump to Ultra drops the average to 111 FPS, a significant degradation for potentially marginal visual gains. For a consistent high-refresh-rate experience at 1080p, the Medium preset is the most sensible choice, as it maintains a high average while keeping the minimum above 130 FPS.

At 1440p, the performance curve shifts. The Low preset averages 114 FPS, while Medium averages 104 FPS and High averages 92 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 74 FPS. Here, the Medium preset is again the sweet spot, providing an average above 100 FPS with a minimum of 88 FPS. This is a playable experience for most users, though those sensitive to frame drops might prefer Low. At 4K, the GPU is heavily strained. The Low preset averages 64 FPS, which is the only setting that breaks the 60 FPS barrier. Medium averages 59 FPS, High drops to 52 FPS, and Ultra falls to 42 FPS. Given that 4K is extremely demanding for this integrated GPU, the Low preset is the only recommendation for a playable experience, as it offers a 10% improvement over Medium and a 23% improvement over High. In summary, the data suggests that Medium is the best all-around preset for 1080p and 1440p, while Low is the only viable option for 4K.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B390 ranks 2661 out of 3010 tested combos in Roblox. This ranking places it in the lower quartile of all tested systems, indicating that it is not a high-performance pairing for this game. The rank is primarily a reflection of the GPU's limitations, as the CPU is relatively powerful. The GPU's 9th percentile ranking among all GPUs drags the entire system down, despite the CPU's 78th percentile ranking. The data shows a significant mismatch in capability between the two components. While the Ryzen 5 7600 is capable of producing high frame rates in less demanding scenarios, the Arc B390 cannot capitalize on that performance.

The combination's rank of 2661 means that roughly 349 other combos perform worse, but the vast majority of tested systems (over 88%) outperform it. This is not a combo for competitive play or high-fidelity graphics. The benchmark results indicate that users with this setup will experience frame rates primarily limited by the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth. The ranking also implies that upgrading the GPU would be the most effective way to improve performance in Roblox, as the CPU has ample headroom. The deltaPct values for the GPU's rivals show that it is only marginally faster than very old, low-end graphics cards, reinforcing its position at the bottom of the performance spectrum. This combo is functional for casual play at lower settings, but it is not a performance-oriented configuration.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Examining the FPS drop across resolutions reveals the nature of the system's bottleneck. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 155 at 1080p to 104 at 1440p, a 33% decrease. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops from 104 to 59, a 43% decrease. From 1080p to 4K, the FPS drops by 62%. This pattern of significant frame rate decline with increasing resolution is a hallmark of a GPU-limited system. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would be more consistent across resolutions, as the CPU's workload does not increase proportionally with pixel count. Here, the data shows that the GPU's rendering capabilities are being saturated as the pixel output demand rises.

At Low settings, the same trend is visible: 171 FPS at 1080p, 114 at 1440p (a 33% drop), and 64 at 4K (a 44% drop from 1440p). The consistent ~33% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~43-44% drop from 1440p to 4K across different settings presets strongly suggests that the graphics pipeline is the limiting factor. The system's shared memory architecture for the GPU is likely a contributing factor, as higher resolutions require more memory bandwidth, which is shared with the CPU and can cause contention. The data clearly shows that the Intel Arc B390 is not suited for high-resolution gaming, and the system's performance is directly tied to the GPU's ability to fill pixels. The CPU's role in this scaling is passive; it is fast enough to avoid becoming a bottleneck until the GPU is pushed to its limits at 4K.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average frame rate for this combo at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 111 FPS.

Q: Does this system achieve a playable frame rate at 4K with High settings?

A: No, the average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 52 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS threshold typically considered smooth for most players.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B390 GPU is the bottleneck. Its 9th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its shared memory architecture are the main limiting factors, as the CPU has a relatively high 78th percentile ranking.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 5 7600 compared to the Intel Core i9-11900KF in average benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900KF's score of 26212.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a consistent 60+ FPS experience at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 provides an average of 104 FPS with a minimum of 88 FPS, ensuring a stable experience above 60 FPS. The Low preset offers a higher average (114 FPS) but the Medium preset is the best balance for visual quality.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo at any resolution?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 42 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table outlines the exact measured average frame rates for each resolution and settings preset combination.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: Average FPS 171.
• Medium: Average FPS 155, with a minimum of 132 and a maximum of 179.
• High: Average FPS 137.
• Ultra: Average FPS 111.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: Average FPS 114.
• Medium: Average FPS 104, with a minimum of 88 and a maximum of 119.
• High: Average FPS 92.
• Ultra: Average FPS 74.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: Average FPS 64.
• Medium: Average FPS 59, with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 67.
• High: Average FPS 52.
• Ultra: Average FPS 42.

The data confirms a clear performance hierarchy. The system is capable of high frame rates at 1080p, particularly on medium and low settings, but struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K on any setting above Low. The frame rates at 1440p represent a middle ground, with the Medium preset offering the best combination of smoothness and visual quality. The lack of min/max FPS data for most presets limits the analysis of frame time consistency, but the available data for Medium presets shows a reasonable spread, suggesting stable performance in those scenarios. Overall, this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming with medium settings, where it can deliver a smooth experience.