Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
162
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 162 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 70 87 119
1440p QHD 104 133 164 224
1080p Full HD 163 208 258 353

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 119
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Ultra 55
2560x1440 Low 224
2560x1440 Medium 164
2560x1440 High 133
2560x1440 Ultra 104
1920x1080 Low 353
1920x1080 Medium 258
1920x1080 High 208
1920x1080 Ultra 163

Road 96 with Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers a dominant performance in Road 96, placing the combination in the 91st percentile of all tested configurations. This combo ranks 328th out of 3713 tested combinations, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of systems in this adventure title. The data shows a platform capable of delivering extremely high frame rates even at demanding resolutions, with the primary bottleneck shifting from the CPU at lower settings to the GPU at higher fidelity presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 328 out of 3713 tested combinations places it in the top 8.8% of all systems benchmarked for Road 96. This strong position is supported by the underlying component performance: the CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. The combination of these two high-percentile components results in a system that consistently delivers frame rates well above playable thresholds across every resolution tested.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU's synthetic scores align closely with its direct competitors. The Intel Core i7-12700KF achieves an average benchmark score of 35365, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, a -0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, a 0.2% delta). This places the processor in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences between 12th and 13th generation parts yield negligible real-world separation. The GPU similarly sits near its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, with an average score of 54209 compared to 54247, representing only a -0.1% difference.

In practical terms for Road 96, this ranking means the system rarely becomes the limiting factor. At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 353 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most displays. Even at the most demanding tested configuration — 4K Ultra — the system maintains 55 FPS, indicating that while the title becomes more GPU-bound at higher resolutions, the hardware still delivers a smooth experience. The rank reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically underperforms relative to the other.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing for Road 96, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is more than sufficient for Road 96's art style and scene complexity, as evidenced by the consistent frame times across all tested presets. The card's boost clock of 2550 MHz (with a base of 2295 MHz) allows it to sustain high throughput during extended gaming sessions.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial, with 10240 shading units and 80 RT cores, though Road 96 does not heavily leverage ray tracing. The card achieves a Passmark G3D score of 34245 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 19822, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080, scores nearly identically (54247 vs 54209 average), confirming that the SUPER variant offers marginal synthetic improvements that translate to single-digit percentage gains in real workloads.

In Road 96 specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 353 FPS, suggesting that the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. However, at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 55 FPS, indicating that the GPU is now the primary constraint. The 16 GB VRAM allocation ensures that texture streaming and scene complexity do not introduce stutters or hitches, as evidenced by the minimum FPS values at Medium settings: 219 FPS at 1080p, 140 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the data suggests that High settings provide the most compelling experience across all resolutions. At 1080p High, the system achieves 208 FPS, which is well above the threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1440p High, the frame rate remains excellent at 133 FPS, offering a smooth experience on 144Hz displays. Even at 4K High, the system maintains 70 FPS, which is playable on standard 60Hz panels with headroom for V-Sync.

Ultra settings, while visually superior, introduce a significant performance penalty that may not be justified. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 55 FPS, which approaches the lower bound of smooth gameplay. At 1440p Ultra, the system achieves 104 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 22% reduction compared to High settings. The jump from High to Ultra is the largest single-step performance cost in the measured data, suggesting diminishing returns in visual quality.

Medium settings offer a middle ground for users prioritizing frame rate over fidelity. At 4K Medium, the system achieves 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, making it a viable option for high-refresh-rate 4K displays. Low settings are only recommended for competitive play or extremely high refresh rates, as the system achieves 353 FPS at 1080p Low but loses significant visual detail. For most users, High settings at 1440p or 4K provide the optimal compromise between image quality and smoothness.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance ceiling. Low settings produce an average of 353 FPS, while Medium yields 258 FPS (min 219, max 297). High settings reduce the average to 208 FPS, and Ultra further drops to 163 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 54% reduction in frame rate, indicating that even at this resolution, the GPU is beginning to feel the pressure of higher-quality presets.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a clear step down. Low settings average 224 FPS, Medium achieves 164 FPS (min 140, max 189), High delivers 133 FPS, and Ultra falls to 104 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings results in a 36-40% performance decrease, which aligns with the additional pixel count (2.25x more pixels) being partially offset by the GPU's headroom.

At 3840x2160, the system's limits become apparent. Low settings average 119 FPS, which is still excellent for 4K. Medium settings drop to 87 FPS (min 74, max 100), High falls to 70 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 55 FPS. The minimum FPS values at Medium settings across all resolutions (219 at 1080p, 140 at 1440p, 74 at 4K) indicate that the system maintains consistent frame pacing without severe drops, even under load.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the system's bottleneck characteristics. At Low settings, the transition from 1080p (353 FPS) to 1440p (224 FPS) represents a 37% drop, while the move to 4K (119 FPS) represents a further 47% reduction from 1440p. This steep decline at lower settings suggests that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor as resolution increases, even when the CPU has ample headroom.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is more gradual: 1080p Ultra achieves 163 FPS, 1440p Ultra drops to 104 FPS (36% reduction), and 4K Ultra falls to 55 FPS (47% reduction from 1440p). The consistent percentage drops across different settings levels indicate that the system is scaling predictably with resolution, with the GPU being the primary constraint at all resolutions above 1080p.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is capable of feeding frames faster than the GPU can render them, particularly at Low and Medium settings where the frame rates exceed 250 FPS. However, at 4K, the GPU's rendering workload dominates, and the frame rate becomes entirely dependent on the RTX 4080 SUPER's fill rate and memory bandwidth. The 16 GB VRAM buffer ensures that even at 4K Ultra, there is no memory-related stuttering, but the raw compute requirements of the higher resolution cap the achievable frame rate at 55 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo overkill for Road 96?

A: The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 353 FPS, which far exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors. However, at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 55 FPS, indicating that the hardware is well-utilized at the highest fidelity settings. The combo provides headroom for future titles or higher refresh-rate displays without being wasteful.

Q: What is the best resolution to play Road 96 with this setup?

A: The measured FPS data indicates that 1440p High (133 FPS) offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it clears the 120 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay while maintaining high detail. 4K High (70 FPS) is also viable for users prioritizing resolution over frame rate.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its direct rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF achieves an average benchmark score of 35365, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, -0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, +0.2% delta). This indicates that the processor performs within a 0.2% margin of its closest competitors.

Q: Does the GPU's 16 GB VRAM matter for Road 96?

A: The 16 GB GDDR6X memory with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and scene complexity do not introduce stutters. The minimum FPS values at Medium settings (219 FPS at 1080p, 140 FPS at 1440p, 74 FPS at 4K) suggest that VRAM is not a bottleneck in this title.

Q: Why is there such a large performance gap between High and Ultra settings?

A: The measured data shows that at 1080p, High achieves 208 FPS while Ultra drops to 163 FPS (a 22% reduction). At 4K, the gap is even more pronounced: High averages 70 FPS while Ultra falls to 55 FPS (a 21% reduction). This suggests that Ultra settings introduce significant rendering overhead that disproportionately impacts the GPU.

Q: Is the system more CPU-bound or GPU-bound in Road 96?

A: The resolution scaling data indicates that at 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound, as frame rates exceed 350 FPS at Low settings. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with frame rates dropping to 55-119 FPS depending on settings. The transition point occurs somewhere between 1440p and 4K, where the GPU's rendering load begins to dominate.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2550 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 119.0
3840x2160 Medium 87.0
3840x2160 High 70.0
3840x2160 Ultra 55.0
2560x1440 Low 224.0
2560x1440 Medium 164.0
2560x1440 High 133.0
2560x1440 Ultra 104.0
1920x1080 Low 353.0
1920x1080 Medium 258.0
1920x1080 High 208.0
1920x1080 Ultra 163.0

Road 96 with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RTX 4080 SUPER + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RTX 4080 SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.