Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 71 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 29 | 36 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 60 | 74 | 99 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 93 | 111 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is a stylized adventure that scales surprisingly hard with GPU load, and the Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combo shows a clear split between CPU-bound and GPU-bound behavior. The measured data indicates that this pairing is capable of smooth 1080p play but struggles to maintain playable framerates at 4K, with the RTX 2060 acting as the primary bottleneck in the higher resolution ranges.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, revealing a classic GPU-limited scenario at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average framerate falls from 93 FPS at 1920x1080 to 59.5 FPS at 2560x1440, then collapses to 28.8 FPS at 3840x2160. That is a 69% reduction from 1080p to 4K, which is substantial but not unexpected for a GPU with 6 GB of VRAM and a 192-bit memory bus. The scaling is even more punishing at Ultra, where the 71.9 FPS at 1080p drops to 46.6 FPS at 1440p and finally to 22.3 FPS at 4K — a 69% loss as well, but from a lower starting point.
The Low preset tells a different story. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 155.6 FPS, which is more than double the 4K High result. The drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low is 56.7 FPS (36% loss), and the drop from 1440p Low to 4K Low is 48.4 FPS (49% loss). This pattern — where the percentage loss grows as resolution increases — points directly at the GPU's pixel throughput limits. The RTX 2060's 80.64 GPixel/s pixel rate and 6.451 TFLOPS FP32 performance are simply not enough to feed a 4K panel at high quality settings. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, is not the limiting factor here; the data shows that even at 1080p Low, the framerate is high enough to suggest the i5-14400F has headroom left on the table.
Settings Recommendations
For this specific combo, the sweet spot is clearly Medium at 1440p or High at 1080p. The measured data shows that Medium at 2560x1440 delivers 74.2 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. High at 1080p, meanwhile, hits 93 FPS, offering a fluid experience with better visual fidelity. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs 14.7 FPS (a 20% drop), which is a noticeable hit for marginal visual gains in a game like Road 96, where the art style is more about narrative mood than raw texture detail.
Ultra is not worth the cost at any resolution. At 1080p Ultra, the combo manages 71.9 FPS, which is playable, but the drop to 46.6 FPS at 1440p Ultra and 22.3 FPS at 4K Ultra makes it a non-starter for higher resolutions. If you are targeting 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option, yielding 50.5 FPS — barely playable but with significant visual compromises. The data strongly suggests that Medium or High presets at 1440p offer the best balance of framerate and image quality for this hardware pairing. At 1080p, High is the recommended choice; the 93 FPS average leaves enough headroom for dips without falling below 60 FPS in most scenes.
GPU Role
The RTX 2060 is the defining component in this combo's performance profile. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, the bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p and even 1440p, but it becomes a wall at 4K. The measured results show that the GPU's 12 nm Turing architecture, with 1920 shading units and 30 RT cores, is not designed for 4K gaming at high settings. The 4K High result of 28.8 FPS is below playable thresholds, and even the 4K Medium result of 36.1 FPS is marginal. The GPU's benchmark percentile of 58 places it in the mid-range of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals — the AMD Radeon RX 7600S (0.5% higher score) and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (1.7% lower) — show that it sits in a crowded performance tier.
The boost clock of 1680 MHz and base clock of 1365 MHz are modest by modern standards, and the data reflects that. At 1080p Low, the GPU can push 155.6 FPS, indicating that the chip has enough raw compute for light loads. However, the 4K Ultra result of 22.3 FPS shows that the 6 GB VRAM and 48 ROPs are insufficient for heavy pixel workloads. The 14 Gbps effective memory speed helps at lower resolutions but cannot compensate for the lack of memory capacity and bandwidth at 4K. This is a GPU that excels at 1080p and handles 1440p with some settings adjustments, but it is not a 4K-capable part for this title.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 1400 out of 1684 tested combinations in Road 96, placing it in the bottom 17% of all systems. This is a low ranking, but it is important to contextualize it: the ranking likely includes many high-end GPUs that are far more powerful than the RTX 2060. The CPU itself, the i5-14400F, ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32508, meaning the processor is not the weak link. The GPU, however, ranks in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, which drags the overall combo down. The data indicates that this pairing is a mid-range system that performs as expected for its components, but it is not competitive with modern high-end combos that can push 4K Ultra at high framerates.
The gap between the CPU's strong standing and the GPU's mid-tier position explains why the combo rank is so low. In a game like Road 96, which is not heavily threaded, the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads are largely overkill, while the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 80.64 GPixel/s pixel rate become the limiting factors. If you are building a system for this game, the data suggests that investing in a stronger GPU would yield better returns than upgrading the CPU.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14400F is a capable processor that does not bottleneck the RTX 2060 in this title. With 10 cores (likely 6 performance and 4 efficient) and 16 threads, it offers more than enough compute for a game like Road 96, which is not demanding on multi-threaded workloads. The boost clock of 4.70 GHz and base clock of 2.50 GHz provide strong single-thread performance, which is what matters most for this genre. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21914 and single-core score of 3093 confirm that the CPU is well above average, and its 88th percentile ranking across all CPUs supports this.
The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo hits 155.6 FPS, which is high enough that the CPU is likely the limiting factor at that point — but even that framerate is well above what most displays can show. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU takes over as the bottleneck, and the CPU's role diminishes. The i5-14400F's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12800H (0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (0.2% delta), all within a negligible performance range. This means the CPU is not a differentiator in this combo; it is a solid foundation that will not hold back the GPU at typical gaming resolutions. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support are adequate for this workload.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a comprehensive look at how this combo performs across all settings and resolutions. At 3840x2160, the results are: Low 50.5 FPS, Medium 36.1 FPS, High 28.8 FPS, and Ultra 22.3 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 28.2 FPS, showing that the GPU is heavily stressed at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the results are: Low 98.9 FPS, Medium 74.2 FPS, High 59.5 FPS, and Ultra 46.6 FPS. This is the resolution where the combo becomes playable, with Medium and High both exceeding 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the results are: Low 155.6 FPS, Medium 111.4 FPS, High 93 FPS, and Ultra 71.9 FPS. All settings at 1080p are playable, with even Ultra maintaining a solid 71.9 FPS average.
The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in settings costs roughly 15-25% performance, and each step up in resolution costs a similar amount. The most dramatic drop is from 1440p High to 4K High, which loses 30.7 FPS (a 52% reduction). The most efficient setting for this combo is 1080p Medium, which delivers 111.4 FPS — a framerate that is smooth for any display and leaves headroom for recording or streaming. For 1440p users, Medium at 74.2 FPS is the best balance, while 4K users should stick to Low at 50.5 FPS if they want to stay above 30 FPS. The RTX 2060's 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at these settings, but the 4K results indicate that the memory and compute resources are stretched to their limits, confirming that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 50.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 36.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 28.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 22.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 98.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 74.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 59.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 46.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 155.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 111.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 93.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.9 |
Road 96 with ii5-14400F + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14400F + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.