Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 97 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 42 | 50 | 71 |
| 1440p QHD | 62 | 79 | 97 | 134 |
| 1080p Full HD | 100 | 129 | 154 | 210 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is an adventure title from 2021, and the benchmark data for the Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT reveals a configuration that is heavily influenced by the graphics card at higher resolutions, while the CPU's four cores prove sufficient for the game's demands. The measured results show a clear progression of performance scaling across the three tested resolutions, with the frame rate dropping by roughly 50% from 1080p to 4K at identical settings. This indicates that while the CPU provides a solid foundation, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases, a typical pattern for a game of this genre that does not heavily tax multi-threaded processing.
Resolution Scaling
Examining the data from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, the performance drop is substantial and consistent across all settings presets. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 128.8 FPS at 1080p to 79.4 FPS at 1440p, and further down to 42 FPS at 4K. This represents a 67% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. The scaling pattern is similar for the other presets, with Low settings dropping from 210.3 FPS at 1080p to 70.6 FPS at 4K, a 66% decrease. Medium settings see a drop from 154 FPS to 50.4 FPS, and Ultra settings fall from 99.6 FPS to 35.7 FPS. The consistency of this drop-off across all presets strongly suggests that the limiting factor shifts decisively to the GPU as resolution climbs.
The frame rate deltas between 1440p and 4K are particularly telling. At High settings, the difference is 37.4 FPS, while at Low settings, it is 63.3 FPS. This larger absolute drop at lower settings indicates that the GPU is being pushed harder by the pixel count, regardless of the visual complexity of the scene. The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to reach very high frame rates, but at 4K, the GPU's rendering throughput—its pixel rate and memory bandwidth—becomes the bottleneck, capping performance at levels that are playable but far from the high refresh rates seen at lower resolutions.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its benchmark results show a strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 893 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2224. This strength in single-threaded tasks is relevant for Road 96, which is an adventure game that typically relies more on consistent frame pacing than on massive multi-threaded scaling. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11912 suggests it has enough aggregate throughput for the game's logic, but the key is its per-core efficiency.
The data shows that the CPU is not the primary constraint at lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 210.3 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that indicates the CPU can handle the game's simulation and draw call overhead without becoming a bottleneck. The processor's 12 MB of shared L3 cache and support for dual-channel memory are adequate for this workload. The CPU's percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 72, placing it above the median, and its average benchmark score of 13516 is nearly identical to that of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which is a much more expensive and higher-core-count part. This suggests that for a game like Road 96, the i3-12100F's architecture and clock speeds are more important than raw core counts, and the measured frame rates confirm that it does not hold the GPU back at 1080p.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested configurations for Road 96, this specific combination of the Intel Core i3-12100F and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT holds a rank of 860 out of 1684 combos. This places it in the 51st percentile, meaning it performs better than just over half of all tested systems for this game. The ranking is a composite measure that considers the average frame rates across all resolutions and settings. Given that the GPU is a high-end part from the RX 6000 series with a percentile ranking of 79 versus all GPUs, the overall combo rank is likely tempered by the CPU's more modest standing.
The GPU's average benchmark score is 35327, which is close to that of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, a card known for high 4K performance. However, the combo rank of 860 suggests that the CPU is preventing the system from achieving a higher placement. The deltaPct values for the GPU's nearest rivals are all within 1.3%, indicating that the RX 6750 XT is in a very tight performance band with its competitors. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-7700K, is only 1.8% slower on average, which shows that the i3-12100F is a capable performer in its class. The measured data for this combo reflects a system that is well-balanced for 1440p gaming but falls behind the top-tier combos in the database, which likely feature more powerful CPUs that can better sustain high frame rates at 1080p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's capabilities. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 210.3 FPS on Low, 154 FPS on Medium, 128.8 FPS on High, and 99.6 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show that the system is capable of driving high refresh rate monitors at 1080p, even on the Ultra preset, which maintains an average above 90 FPS. At 2560x1440, the performance drops to 133.9 FPS on Low, 97.3 FPS on Medium, 79.4 FPS on High, and 61.5 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p results are still very playable, with the Ultra preset holding above 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 70.6 FPS on Low, 50.4 FPS on Medium, 42 FPS on High, and 35.7 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show that the system struggles to maintain a smooth 60 FPS experience on any preset, with only the Low preset exceeding that threshold.
The progression from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows a consistent performance cost for increased visual fidelity. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 110.7 FPS, while at 1440p it is 72.4 FPS, and at 4K it is 34.9 FPS. This diminishing absolute difference as resolution increases reinforces the idea that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The data also shows that the gap between Medium and High is smaller than the gap between Low and Medium, suggesting that the High preset is a balanced middle ground. The Ultra preset appears to carry a significant performance penalty for what may be only a marginal visual improvement in this adventure game.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Road 96?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 on Ultra settings provides an average of 61.5 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This represents the highest resolution and settings combination that maintains a playable frame rate without dropping below the 60 FPS mark.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Road 96?
A: Yes, but with limitations. At 4K, the average frame rates range from 70.6 FPS on Low to 35.7 FPS on Ultra. Only the Low preset exceeds 60 FPS, meaning that players will need to significantly reduce visual quality to achieve smooth performance at 4K.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13516. It is 0.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, 0.4% faster than the Intel Core i7-1250U, 0.6% faster than the Intel Core i3-10105, and 1.8% faster than the Intel Core i7-7700K.
Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: No, the data suggests the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. With a frame rate of 210.3 FPS on Low settings, the GPU is likely not being fully utilized, as the CPU's processing speed caps the output. The frame rate scaling between presets at this resolution is more pronounced, indicating CPU headroom is being exhausted.
Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves 79.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 61.5 FPS. This represents a 17.9 FPS drop for the Ultra preset, which is a 22.5% reduction in performance for the highest visual quality tier.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested combos?
A: This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 860th out of 1684 total tested combos for Road 96. This places it in the middle of the pack, indicating that while it is a capable system, there are many other configurations that deliver higher average frame rates.
Settings Recommendations
For players using the Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 99.6 FPS, which is well above the smoothness threshold and provides the best visual experience without significant performance concerns. The High preset at 128.8 FPS is also an excellent option for those who prefer higher frame rates. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset at 61.5 FPS is the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it barely maintains 60 FPS. For a more comfortable margin, the High preset at 79.4 FPS is a safer choice that still looks great. At 3840x2160, the data indicates that the Low preset at 70.6 FPS is the only viable option for maintaining smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 50.4 FPS is playable but may feel less fluid, while the High and Ultra presets at 42 and 35.7 FPS respectively are not recommended for a good experience. The measured data shows that the High preset is the most balanced across all resolutions, but players seeking the highest fidelity should use Ultra at 1080p or 1440p.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 70.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 50.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 133.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 97.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 79.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 61.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 210.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 154.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 128.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 99.6 |
Road 96 with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 6750 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.