Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
122
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 122 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 54 65 88
1440p QHD 76 102 125 170
1080p Full HD 125 157 192 268

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 88
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Ultra 39
2560x1440 Low 170
2560x1440 Medium 125
2560x1440 High 102
2560x1440 Ultra 76
1920x1080 Low 268
1920x1080 Medium 192
1920x1080 High 157
1920x1080 Ultra 125

Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis

Road 96 is not a demanding title by modern standards, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination proves this decisively. The data shows this pairing delivers excellent frame rates across all tested resolutions, with the primary challenge being the steep performance cost of the Ultra preset. Benchmark results indicate that users should prioritize the High preset for the best balance of visual fidelity and smoothness, as it provides a substantial frame rate advantage over Ultra while remaining visually robust.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data clearly identifies the High preset as the optimal experience for this hardware combination. At 1920x1080, High delivers 156.7 FPS, which is 31.6 FPS higher than Ultra’s 125.1 FPS, while still offering the same visual quality tier that most players expect from modern settings. The Medium preset at 191.7 FPS is faster, but the jump from High to Medium only gains 35 FPS, whereas the drop from High to Ultra loses 31.6 FPS, indicating that High is the sweet spot for maintaining high refresh rates without sacrificing image quality.

At 2560x1440, the High preset produces 101.6 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Ultra drops to 76 FPS, which is still playable, but the 25.6 FPS penalty for the extra settings is significant. For 3840x2160, High yields 54 FPS, which is borderline for 60 Hz displays, but Ultra falls to 39 FPS, making it difficult to recommend for consistent motion. The data suggests that Low settings at 4K achieve 88.2 FPS, but the visual compromise is substantial.

The Ultra preset is the only setting that consistently underperforms relative to the rest of the scale. At 1080p, Ultra is 20.2% slower than High; at 1440p, it is 25.2% slower; and at 4K, it is 27.8% slower. This pattern indicates that Ultra’s additional effects tax the GPU disproportionately, and the frame rate gains from dropping to High are always worth the minor visual reduction. For 144Hz displays, Medium at 1440p (124.6 FPS) is the only preset that approaches that refresh rate, but High at 101.6 FPS is more practical for most monitors.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 60 FPS at 4K with this combo?

A: The High preset at 3840x2160 produces 54 FPS, which is below 60 FPS. The Low preset achieves 88.2 FPS, and Medium reaches 65 FPS, so Medium is the only preset that clears 60 FPS without dropping to Low.

Q: How much faster is Low compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low delivers 267.9 FPS, which is 142.8 FPS higher than Ultra’s 125.1 FPS. This represents a 114.1% improvement, making Low more than twice as fast as Ultra.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance in this game?

A: The data shows that frame rates scale consistently with resolution changes, suggesting a GPU-bound workload. At 1080p High, the combo reaches 156.7 FPS, but at 4K High, it drops to 54 FPS, which is a 65.5% reduction, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: Is the RTX 3080’s 10 GB VRAM sufficient for Road 96?

A: The VRAM capacity is not a bottleneck in any of the measured rows. Even at 4K Ultra, the GPU produces 39 FPS, which is a performance issue rather than a memory capacity issue, as no settings fail to load.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The 2560x1440 Medium preset delivers 124.6 FPS, which is suitable for 120 Hz displays. This is 48.6 FPS higher than High at the same resolution.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This pairing ranks 539th out of 1684 combos, placing it in the top 32% of all tested systems for Road 96.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the dominant component in this pairing for Road 96. The GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus provides 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for this game’s assets. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU’s compute capabilities, rated at 29.77 TFLOPS FP32, scale directly with resolution, confirming that rendering load is the primary variable.

The RTX 3080’s boost clock of 1710 MHz and base clock of 1440 MHz are standard for the Ampere architecture, and the data does not show any clock-related anomalies. The GPU’s 8704 shading units and 272 texture mapping units handle the game’s visual effects efficiently, as evidenced by the High preset achieving 156.7 FPS at 1080p. However, the Ultra preset’s performance penalty (39 FPS at 4K versus 54 FPS at High) suggests that specific Ultra effects, such as shadow quality or post-processing, disproportionately tax the GPU’s 96 ROPs.

The GPU’s 80th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35787, indicates it is a high-end part, but not top-tier. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, scores 36101, a 0.9% difference, while the Radeon 880M trails by 0.4%. This competitive positioning explains why the combo struggles at 4K Ultra (39 FPS) but excels at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce 267.9 FPS, Medium achieves 191.7 FPS, High reaches 156.7 FPS, and Ultra drops to 125.1 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 142.8 FPS, with each successive preset reducing performance by roughly 25-40 FPS. These numbers indicate that even Ultra is playable at 1080p, but the gains from dropping to High are substantial.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a clearer tier separation. Low hits 169.5 FPS, Medium reaches 124.6 FPS, High manages 101.6 FPS, and Ultra falls to 76 FPS. The 4K resolution shows the most dramatic scaling: Low produces 88.2 FPS, Medium drops to 65 FPS, High settles at 54 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 39 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only measured row below 40 FPS, making it the weakest configuration.

Comparing presets across resolutions, the percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent: Low falls by 36.7%, Medium by 35.0%, High by 35.2%, and Ultra by 39.2%. The drop from 1440p to 4K is larger: Low falls by 48.0%, Medium by 47.8%, High by 46.9%, and Ultra by 48.7%. This consistency indicates that the GPU’s rendering pipeline scales predictably with pixel count.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is significant across all settings. At High settings, the frame rate falls from 156.7 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 4K, a 65.5% reduction. At Low settings, the drop is from 267.9 FPS to 88.2 FPS, a 67.1% reduction. These values are close to the theoretical pixel count increase: 4K has 4 times the pixels of 1080p, but the frame rate only drops by roughly two-thirds, indicating that the GPU is not purely pixel-bound.

The scaling pattern suggests that Road 96’s rendering workload is partially dependent on resolution but also includes fixed overhead. The 1440p results show a smaller relative drop: High falls from 156.7 FPS to 101.6 FPS, a 35.2% reduction, which is less than the 44% pixel increase from 1080p to 1440p. This implies that at 1080p, the CPU or memory bandwidth may be slightly limiting, allowing the GPU to perform better than pure pixel scaling would suggest.

The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is the clearest indicator of GPU limitation. The RTX 3080’s 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient, but the 29.77 TFLOPS compute capability is not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K with Ultra effects. The data shows that dropping to Medium at 4K (65 FPS) provides a 66.7% improvement over Ultra, making resolution scaling a more effective lever than settings optimization at 4K.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D provides ample processing power for Road 96, as evidenced by the frame rates not being CPU-limited at any resolution. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz, are more than sufficient for this adventure game. The 96 MB of shared L3 cache is particularly beneficial for gaming, as it reduces memory latency.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 34004 multicore and 4800 singlecore, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 37780 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6353P, which scores 37811 (a 0.1% difference). The Intel Core i9-13900HK scores 38020, a 0.6% advantage, and the Core i5-13600KF scores 38028, a 0.7% advantage.

The data shows that the CPU’s performance is essentially irrelevant for this game. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 267.9 FPS, which is likely near the game’s engine limit. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4800 in Cinebench R23 and its 3DMark single-thread score of 1212 indicate that it can handle any frame rate the GPU can produce. The CPU’s 4 nm process and 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die provide excellent efficiency, but this does not translate to additional FPS in Road 96.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 539th out of 1684 tested combos for Road 96, placing it in the 68th percentile of all systems. This is a strong result, given that the RTX 3080 is end-of-life and the CPU is a high-end part. The ranking reflects the GPU’s 80th percentile standing among all GPUs, which is slightly higher than the combo’s overall rank, suggesting that the CPU is not the limiting factor.

The combo’s ranking is consistent with its measured FPS. At 1440p High, it achieves 101.6 FPS, which is above the average for most games. The 4K High result of 54 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold, but this is typical for a GPU of this class. The RTX 3080’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, scores 36101 in benchmarks, a 0.9% advantage, but the combo’s 539th rank indicates that this difference does not translate to a major FPS gap in Road 96.

The rank of 539 out of 1684 means that 1145 tested combos perform worse, while 538 perform better. This places the system in the upper third of all configurations, which is impressive for a GPU released in 2020. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking does not boost the combo further, confirming that Road 96 is heavily GPU-bound. For users with this hardware, the data suggests that the RTX 3080 is the component to upgrade for better 4K performance, while the CPU can remain unchanged for this title.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5200 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1710 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 88.2
3840x2160 Medium 65.0
3840x2160 High 54.0
3840x2160 Ultra 39.0
2560x1440 Low 169.5
2560x1440 Medium 124.6
2560x1440 High 101.6
2560x1440 Ultra 76.0
1920x1080 Low 267.9
1920x1080 Medium 191.7
1920x1080 High 156.7
1920x1080 Ultra 125.1

Road 96 with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RTX 3080 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + RTX 3080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.