Road 96

Road 96 is a narrative-driven adventure title, and the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the Intel Arc B370 shows a system that is decisively constrained by its graphics processor. The measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings place this combination in the lower echelon of tested systems, with a combo rank of 2680 out of 2903. This indicates that while the CPU is a capable mid-range part, the integrated-class GPU is the primary bottleneck, limiting performance to levels that are mostly unsuitable for smooth gameplay.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, underscoring the GPU's limitations. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 85 FPS at 1920x1080 to 54 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 31 FPS, and then plummets to 29 FPS at 3840x2160, which is a 56 FPS total loss from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern indicates that the Arc B370's fill rate and memory bandwidth (which is system-dependent) are quickly overwhelmed as pixel count increases.

The trend is even more pronounced at higher settings. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 50 at 1080p to 32 at 1440p, and finally to 17 at 4K. The gap between Low and High at 4K is 12 FPS (29 vs 17), while at 1080p the same settings gap is 35 FPS (85 vs 50). This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so saturated that the additional workload from higher settings has a diminished absolute impact; the card is already at its performance ceiling regardless of the preset. The data clearly shows that this combo is not designed for 4K gaming. The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU, as the Ryzen 5 5600's processing power is far ahead of what the Arc B370 can render.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2680 out of 2903 places this system in the bottom 8% of all tested combinations for Road 96. This is a very low standing, indicating that the vast majority of other CPU and GPU pairings deliver higher frame rates. The ranking reflects the severe performance bottleneck created by the Intel Arc B370, which is an integrated graphics solution with a 25 W TDP. Its performance percentile of 5 versus all GPUs means it is among the slowest graphics processors in the database. In contrast, the Ryzen 5 5600 sits in the 74th percentile against all CPUs, highlighting a massive imbalance between the two components in this gaming scenario.

This pairing is a classic example of a high-end CPU being held back by a low-end GPU. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V and the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G, have average benchmark scores within 0.2% of the 5600, but in this game, the combo's ranking is dragged down by the GPU. The data suggests that any of the tested competitor GPUs would likely produce a significantly better result in Road 96, as the CPU is not the limiting factor. The rank is a direct consequence of the GPU's inability to maintain playable frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the defining component in this benchmark, and its specifications explain the observed performance. It features a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with 1280 shading units and 20 ROPs. While the boost clock is relatively high, the architecture is designed for mobile or integrated use with a power limit of 25 W. This low power envelope severely restricts its performance, resulting in a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of just 1184. This score places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, putting it in direct competition with legacy parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which have scores of 1186 and 1190, respectively.

The GPU's memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's main DDR4 memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The bandwidth is therefore "System Dependent," and in this configuration, it becomes a major bottleneck. In a game like Road 96, which likely requires moderate texture memory, the shared memory architecture can lead to stuttering and lower frame rates as the GPU and CPU compete for bandwidth. The measured FPS data reflects this: even at 1080p Low, the average of 85 FPS is respectable, but it falls to 62 FPS on Medium and 50 FPS on High. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields only 39 FPS, illustrating how quickly the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are exhausted when the visual load increases.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Road 96 with this combo?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the only resolution that provides a consistently playable experience. At this resolution, the average FPS ranges from 85 on Low to 39 on Ultra. The 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 resolutions all see average frame rates drop below 54 FPS, with the 4K results falling to a range of 13 to 29 FPS, which is not smooth.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its closest rivals in raw GPU power?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184 for the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. This indicates the Arc B370 is performance-equivalent to these older, low-tier graphics solutions.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 CPU a bottleneck for this game?

A: No, the benchmark data indicates the CPU is not the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468 and sits in the 74th percentile against all CPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454, 0.1% delta). The game's frame rates are instead limited by the Intel Arc B370, which is in the 5th percentile for GPUs.

Q: What is the expected frame rate at 1440p on Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the measured average frame rate is 40 FPS, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 46 FPS. This is a playable but not ideal frame rate for a smooth experience, and it shows a significant drop from the 62 FPS average seen at 1080p on the same settings.

Q: Why is the performance gap between Low and Ultra settings so large at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS on Low is 85, while on Ultra it is 39. This 46 FPS difference is substantial and is a direct result of the Arc B370's limited processing power. The Ultra preset demands more from the GPU's shading units and memory system, and the 25 W power limit prevents it from maintaining higher throughput, leading to the observed halving of performance.

Q: Does the system have enough power to run the game at 4K with any settings?

A: No, the data shows that 4K performance is consistently poor. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 29 on Low settings. Medium settings yield 21 FPS, High yields 17 FPS, and Ultra yields only 13 FPS. These frame rates are far below what is generally considered playable for a smooth experience, confirming the GPU is not capable of 4K rendering in this title.

Settings Recommendations

For this combination, the primary goal should be to achieve a stable frame rate above 60 FPS. The only way to accomplish this is to use the Low preset at 1920x1080, which delivers an average of 85 FPS. This is the recommended setting for a smooth, responsive experience. If visual fidelity is a priority and the user is willing to accept lower frame rates, the Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 62 FPS and a minimum of 53 FPS, is a viable alternative. This preset offers a significant visual upgrade over Low while still staying within a generally playable range.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields an average of 54 FPS, which is borderline playable, but the higher presets are not recommended as they all fall below 40 FPS. The 3840x2160 resolution should be avoided entirely, as even the Low preset only achieves 29 FPS, which is too low for a comfortable gaming experience. The data suggests that the best experience is a trade-off between resolution and settings. Prioritizing 1080p with Medium or Low settings is the optimal strategy for this hardware, as it provides the best balance of performance and visual quality.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a six-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. It has a 32 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, it performs strongly, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18309 and a single-core score of 2584. Its average benchmark score of 20468 places it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, making it a solid mid-range processor that is more than capable of handling modern game logic and physics.

However, in the context of this specific benchmark, the CPU's role is diminished. The measured frame rates are so low that the CPU is never the bottleneck. For example, at 1080p Low, the CPU is likely idle waiting for the GPU to render frames. The CPU's power is evident in its rivalry data; it is within 0.5% of the AMD EPYC 7713 and the AMD EPYC 9454P in average score, showing its compute capabilities. Yet, in Road 96, the high frame rate ceiling set by the GPU means the 5600's performance headroom is unused. The data implies that upgrading the GPU would lead to a massive performance increase, as the CPU has ample resources to feed a much more powerful graphics card. The 5600's 65 W TDP and efficient Zen 3 architecture ensure it will not be a limiting factor in this pairing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data is taken directly from the measured FPS table. All values are average FPS unless otherwise specified.

1920x1080:

• Low: 85 FPS average.
• Medium: 62 FPS average, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS.
• High: 50 FPS average.
• Ultra: 39 FPS average.

2560x1440:

• Low: 54 FPS average.
• Medium: 40 FPS average, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 46 FPS.
• High: 32 FPS average.
• Ultra: 25 FPS average.

3840x2160:

• Low: 29 FPS average.
• Medium: 21 FPS average, with a minimum of 18 FPS and a maximum of 24 FPS.
• High: 17 FPS average.
• Ultra: 13 FPS average.

This data shows a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase. The only configuration that consistently exceeds the 60 FPS threshold is 1080p with Low settings. The 1080p Medium setting is close, with a 62 FPS average, but its minimum of 53 FPS may lead to occasional dips. All other configurations fall below the 60 FPS target, and 4K performance is universally poor, with no configuration reaching even 30 FPS on average. The Ultra preset at 4K is the worst performer, with an average of just 13 FPS, highlighting the extreme strain on the Intel Arc B370 at this resolution.