Revolution Idle

The Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination delivers a playable, if not spectacular, experience in Revolution Idle, a game that is far more dependent on GPU throughput than CPU grunt. The benchmark data shows a clear hierarchy where resolution and preset level dictate performance, with the 6-core/12-thread processor providing ample headroom. The combo ranks at 2935 out of 3712 tested configurations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, yet the measured frames per second (FPS) tell a story of consistent 60+ FPS at 1080p for most settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, built on a 14 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s.

For a game like Revolution Idle, which is an idle genre title, the computational load on the CPU is typically minimal. The benchmark scores reflect a processor that is competent in both single and multi-threaded tasks. In single-thread performance, the i5-10400F scores 688 in 3DMark single-thread, 146 in Cinebench R15 single-core, and 2541 in Passmark single-thread. These numbers are adequate for game logic and basic simulation. Multi-threaded performance is stronger, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10283 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 6257, indicating that even if background tasks or complex idle-game calculations were to scale, the CPU has the resources to handle them without becoming a bottleneck.

The CPU's percentile rank is 68, meaning it outperforms 68% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance: the Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163, a delta of 0.2% from the i5-10400F's average benchmark score of 14185. The AMD EPYC 7552 is 0.5% behind, while the Intel Core 7 160UL is 0.3% ahead and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is 0.6% ahead. These deltas are negligible, indicating that the i5-10400F sits in a performance class where minute differences do not translate into measurable FPS changes in Revolution Idle. Consequently, the data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo; the GPU handles the graphical rendering, and the CPU's 12 threads are more than sufficient to feed it.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the primary driver of performance in this configuration. Based on the Turing architecture and manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC, it packs 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. It is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The memory clock is set at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective.

The RTX 2060's compute capabilities include 6.451 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s. It features 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, though these are likely underutilized in a 2D-style idle game. The GPU's benchmark scores show a Passmark G3D score of 14111 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1242, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs.

More importantly, the measured FPS data reveals a direct correlation between GPU load and settings. At 3840x2160 (4K), the RTX 2060 struggles, with average FPS dropping to 24 on High, 26 on Medium, and 34 on Low. The Ultra preset at 4K is nearly unplayable at 16 average FPS. Moving down to 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance more than doubles, with the Low preset hitting 65 average FPS and High reaching 47. At 1920x1080 (1080p), the GPU shows its strength: Low preset achieves 102 average FPS, while High and Medium deliver 74 and 77 average FPS, respectively.

The VRAM capacity of 6 GB is not a limiting factor in Revolution Idle based on the data; the game's demands are modest enough that even at 4K, the frame rates are constrained by raw shading and texture throughput rather than memory capacity. The GPU's nearest rivals in the database—NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0% delta), AMD Radeon 680M (0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (0.6% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.8% delta)—all have similar average benchmark scores, yet the RTX 2060's specific driver optimizations and feature set provide a stable baseline for this game.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Revolution Idle with this combo for a smooth 60 FPS experience?*

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080, all settings except Ultra achieve above 60 average FPS. Specifically, Low hits 102, Medium hits 77, and High hits 74. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset reaches 65 average FPS, so 1080p is the sweet spot for consistent frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14185. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, is 0.6% ahead with a score of 14277, while the Intel Core 7 160UL is 0.3% ahead. The Intel Xeon 6756E is 0.2% behind, and the AMD EPYC 7552 is 0.5% behind. These differences are under 1%, making them statistically insignificant for gaming.

Q: Is the RTX 2060's 6 GB of VRAM sufficient for this game?

A: Yes, the benchmark data indicates that the VRAM is not a bottleneck. The FPS drops at higher resolutions are consistent with GPU compute limits rather than memory exhaustion, as the game is not graphically intensive enough to require more than 6 GB.

Q: What is the average FPS at 2560x1440 on High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 47. This is below the 60 FPS threshold, but it is still playable for an idle game, which does not require fast reaction times.

Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested combos in the database?

A: This specific combo ranks 2935 out of 3712 total tested combinations. This places it in the 21st percentile, meaning roughly 79% of other combos perform better in Revolution Idle.

Q: Which GPU preset yields the highest minimum FPS at 1080p to avoid stutters?

A: The only preset with a recorded minimum FPS at 1080p is Medium, which shows a min of 66 and a max of 89. This indicates that Medium is the safest choice for frame pacing, as Low and High do not have min/max data recorded but average higher.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 secures a rank of 2935 out of 3712 tested combos in Revolution Idle. This is a low-mid tier ranking, indicating that while the hardware is far from the best, it is also not at the bottom. The ranking suggests that most other configurations in the database provide higher frame rates, but the practical impact depends on the user's target resolution and settings.

Given the measured FPS data, this ranking is logical. At 1080p, the combo achieves playable frame rates across all presets except Ultra, which dips to 47 average FPS. The rank of 2935 places it behind a significant majority of combos, likely those with more powerful GPUs or newer CPUs. However, the data shows that the combo still delivers a 102 average FPS at 1080p Low, which is competitive for an entry-level setup. The CPU's percentile rank of 68 and GPU's percentile rank of 58 are both above average, yet the combined score in the game does not reflect a high-tier experience due to the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions.

The ranking implies that for users seeking 4K or high-refresh 1440p gaming, this combo is insufficient. But for 1080p gaming, which is the most common resolution, the combo is adequate. The deltaPct values for the CPU's rivals are all within 0.6%, and the GPU's rivals are within 0.8%, meaning that swapping in any of those components would yield a near-identical rank. This suggests that the combo's rank is more a function of the GPU class than the specific CPU, as the CPU has plenty of headroom.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the data points to the Medium preset at 1920x1080. It delivers an average FPS of 77, with a minimum of 66 and a maximum of 89. This is the only preset at any resolution that offers both a high average and a recorded minimum above 60, ensuring smooth gameplay without drops. The High preset at 1080p averages 74 FPS, but without min/max data, the Medium preset's consistency makes it the safer recommendation.

If the user prioritizes maximum frame rate over visuals, the Low preset at 1080p is the clear winner, achieving 102 average FPS. Conversely, the Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 47 average FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and not recommended for a fluid experience. At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only viable option for near-60 FPS, hitting 65 average, but the Medium and High presets (49 and 47 average FPS, respectively) are playable for a genre that does not demand twitch reactions.

At 3840x2160, no preset is recommended, as even the Low setting only reaches 34 average FPS, and the Ultra setting is a slideshow at 16 average FPS. The best experience, therefore, is to stick to 1080p and use the Medium preset, which offers a compromise between the 77 average FPS and the detailed rendering that the High preset would provide, based on the measured data.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160, the results are as follows: the Low preset averages 34 FPS, the Medium preset averages 26 FPS with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 29, the High preset averages 24 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 16 FPS. None of these are suitable for a smooth experience, but the Low preset is technically the most playable.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance improves significantly. The Low preset achieves an average of 65 FPS, making it the only preset at this resolution to break the 60 FPS barrier. The Medium preset averages 49 FPS, with a minimum of 42 and a maximum of 56, while the High preset averages 47 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 30 average FPS, which is a substantial decrease from High, indicating a heavy load on the GPU.

At 1920x1080, the combo shines. The Low preset tops out at 102 average FPS, providing a highly responsive experience. The Medium preset follows closely with 77 average FPS, and its recorded minimum of 66 FPS ensures no stutter. The High preset averages 74 FPS, which is nearly identical to Medium in average terms. The Ultra preset falls to 47 average FPS, which is the same as the High preset at 1440p, highlighting the significant cost of the Ultra settings. In summary, the data shows a clear scaling pattern: each step down in resolution or settings yields a proportional gain in frame rate, with 1080p Medium being the optimal balance of smoothness and quality.