Revolution Idle

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Revolution Idle with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo delivers 133 FPS, but this drops to 84 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 44 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 67% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the GPU becomes progressively more strained as pixel count rises.

The scaling pattern becomes more pronounced at higher quality presets. With Ultra settings, the transition from 1080p (61 FPS) to 1440p (39 FPS) shows a 36% performance loss, while moving to 4K (20 FPS) represents a 67% drop from 1080p. The Medium preset follows a similar trajectory: 101 FPS at 1080p, 64 FPS at 1440p, and 33 FPS at 4K. The High preset demonstrates the steepest relative decline at 4K, falling from 96 FPS at 1080p to 60 FPS at 1440p and finally to 32 FPS at 4K — a 67% total reduction.

These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the system is not entirely GPU-limited, as the jump from Low (133 FPS) to Ultra (61 FPS) indicates that settings have a substantial impact on performance. However, at 4K, the differences between presets compress: Low delivers 44 FPS, Medium 33 FPS, High 32 FPS, and Ultra 20 FPS. The narrowing gap between Medium and High at 4K (only 1 FPS difference) indicates that the GPU is nearing its throughput ceiling and additional rendering work yields diminishing returns.

The 1440p results show the most balanced behavior. Here, the RTX 4060 maintains playable frame rates across all presets, with Low hitting 84 FPS and High reaching 60 FPS. The 60 FPS at High settings at 1440p represents a meaningful threshold for smooth gameplay, and the data indicates that this resolution is where the GPU's 8 GB memory capacity and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to avoid severe bottlenecks.

At 4K, the RTX 4060's limitations become evident. Even at Low settings, the combo only achieves 44 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 20 FPS. The 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB frame buffer appear to be the limiting factors, as the GPU's shading units and RT cores cannot compensate for the memory bandwidth constraints at this resolution. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming with this combo requires significant settings compromises, making it suitable only for less demanding scenarios.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 1551 out of 2986 tested combos in Revolution Idle. This places the pairing in the 48th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly half of the database entries but trails the top half. The rank reflects the mid-range positioning of both components: the CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards.

The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile ranking and the combo's overall mid-pack position suggests that Revolution Idle's performance is heavily influenced by the GPU. The Ryzen 7 9700F's benchmark scores — including a Passmark single-thread score of 4691 and multithread score of 36470 — indicate it is a capable processor, but these strengths do not translate into top-tier results when paired with a GPU that ranks below the 70th percentile.

Examining the CPU's nearest rivals provides context for its contribution to this combo. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 in average benchmarks, a mere 0.2% difference from the 9700F's 69996. The Intel Core i7-14700KF comes in at 70163, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.7% at 69515. These near-identical scores confirm that the 9700F's processing power is competitive with high-end options, yet the combo rank of 1551 indicates that this CPU strength is not the determining factor in Revolution Idle.

For the GPU, the RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17639 places it close to several older or integrated alternatives. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower). This clustering suggests that the RTX 4060's raw compute performance is not dramatically superior to much more modest hardware, which explains why the combo does not break into the top quartile of tested configurations.

The combo's mid-pack ranking means that users can expect competent but not exceptional performance in Revolution Idle. The data indicates that the pairing is balanced in the sense that neither component severely bottlenecks the other at typical resolutions, but the overall result is a configuration that delivers solid, middle-of-the-road frame rates rather than class-leading numbers.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Revolution Idle?

A: The 2560x1440 resolution offers the best balance, with High settings achieving 60 FPS and Low settings reaching 84 FPS. At 1080p, all presets exceed 60 FPS, but 1440p provides a better visual experience while maintaining smooth performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Revolution Idle?

A: At 3840x2160, the combo delivers 44 FPS on Low settings and 32 FPS on High settings. These numbers are below the 60 FPS threshold typically desired for smooth gameplay, so 4K requires significant compromises and is not recommended for demanding sessions.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals in raw performance?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17639 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% lower). These differences are negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What settings preset provides the most consistent frame pacing?

A: The Medium preset shows the most stable performance with a minimum FPS of 86 at 1080p, 54 at 1440p, and 28 at 4K. The maximum FPS values of 116, 73, and 38 respectively indicate some variance, but the minimums remain acceptable across all resolutions.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9700F a strong performer relative to other CPUs?

A: The CPU ranks at the 94th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 69996. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, scores 69875 (0.2% lower), while the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163 (0.2% higher), showing the 9700F is competitive with high-end chips.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: At High settings, the drop is from 96 FPS to 60 FPS, a 37.5% reduction. At Low settings, the drop from 133 FPS to 84 FPS represents a 36.8% reduction. The scaling is consistent, indicating the GPU handles the increased pixel load predictably.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves 133 FPS, while Medium reaches 101 FPS with a range of 86 to 116 FPS. High settings deliver 96 FPS, and Ultra drops to 61 FPS. The 72 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p shows that the settings spectrum has a substantial impact on frame rates at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains respectable but noticeably lower. Low settings produce 84 FPS, Medium hits 64 FPS with a range of 54 to 73 FPS, High maintains 60 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 45 FPS, indicating that quality presets still matter significantly at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings yield 44 FPS, Medium averages 33 FPS with a range of 28 to 38 FPS, High achieves 32 FPS, and Ultra drops to 20 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 24 FPS, suggesting that the GPU is the limiting factor regardless of settings.

The data reveals an interesting pattern in the Medium preset across resolutions. At 1080p, the minimum FPS of 86 is 85% of the average, while at 1440p, the minimum of 54 is 84% of the average, and at 4K, the minimum of 28 is 85% of the average. This consistency suggests that the Medium preset provides predictable frame pacing relative to its average, making it a reliable choice for users who prefer stable performance.

The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic reduction when scaling from 1440p to 4K, dropping from 39 FPS to 20 FPS — a 49% decrease. In contrast, the Low preset only loses 48% of its performance when scaling from 1440p (84 FPS) to 4K (44 FPS). This indicates that the Ultra preset's additional rendering effects place a proportionally higher load on the GPU at higher resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060's specifications provide context for the measured performance. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The base clock runs at 1830 MHz with a boost clock of 2460 MHz, and the card is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process node.

The 8 GB memory capacity appears sufficient for Revolution Idle at 1080p and 1440p, where the combo consistently achieves playable frame rates. However, at 4K, the combination of higher pixel count and larger texture loads likely strains the memory subsystem, contributing to the reduced performance observed at 3840x2160. The 128-bit bus width is a notable constraint, as it limits the amount of data the GPU can transfer per clock cycle.

The RTX 4060's compute capabilities include 3072 shading units and 24 RT cores. The FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS provides a baseline for rasterization performance, and the measured data suggests that this is adequate for medium-to-high settings at 1440p but insufficient for demanding 4K workloads. The GPU's percentile ranking of 61 among all graphics cards aligns with its mid-range positioning in the measured results.

The pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s indicate the card's ability to fill frames with rendered geometry. At 4K Ultra, where the combo achieves only 20 FPS, these rates are clearly being exceeded by the workload, resulting in the low frame rates observed. The GPU's power draw of 115 W and dual-slot design suggest it is a modestly sized card, yet the data shows it performs adequately for its class.

The RTX 4060's predecessor and successor relationships — GeForce 30 and GeForce 50, respectively — place it in the middle of the 40-series lineup. Its end-of-life production status and the fact that it ranks near older AMD cards like the Radeon HD 7790 in benchmark scores indicate that its raw performance is not exceptional, even if its feature set is modern.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F brings substantial processing power to this combo. With 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.80 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, the CPU is well-equipped to handle game logic and physics calculations. The Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, provides the foundation for the processor's high single-thread performance.

The CPU's Passmark scores reflect its strengths: a single-thread score of 4691 and a multithread score of 36470 place it in the upper echelon of processors. The integer math score of 120788 and floating-point math score of 77955 demonstrate robust arithmetic capabilities, which are relevant for game simulation tasks. The data compression score of 421988 and encryption score of 21488 further highlight the CPU's versatility.

The 9700F's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample fast storage for frequently accessed data. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth available through DDR5 support ensures that the CPU can feed data to the GPU without creating a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes offers high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU, though the RTX 4060 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which may slightly limit data transfer rates.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 94 among all processors confirms that it is a high-end part. Its average benchmark score of 69996 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875, 0.2% higher) and Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163, 0.2% lower). This parity suggests that the 9700F is not the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, including Revolution Idle.

In the context of this game, the CPU's role is likely secondary to the GPU. The measured FPS data shows that performance scales predictably with resolution, which is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads. However, the CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that game logic and update cycles do not introduce frame pacing issues, even at lower resolutions where the GPU can render frames quickly.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings in Revolution Idle. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 96 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is also playable, offering the highest visual quality while maintaining acceptable performance. For users prioritizing frame rate, the Medium preset at 101 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS provides a substantial safety margin against dips.

At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves exactly 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for users with 1440p displays. The Medium preset at 64 FPS offers slightly better performance with a minimum of 54 FPS, which may be preferable for users who want a larger buffer against frame drops. The Low preset at 84 FPS is suitable for competitive play or users with high-refresh-rate monitors, though the visual quality trade-off is significant.

For 4K resolution, the data suggests that the Low preset at 44 FPS is the only viable option for reasonably smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 33 FPS and High preset at 32 FPS are borderline playable but may result in noticeable stuttering during busy scenes. The Ultra preset at 20 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as the frame rate falls below the threshold for comfortable interaction.

The Medium preset emerges as the most balanced choice across all resolutions. At 1080p, it provides 101 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS; at 1440p, it delivers 64 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS; and at 4K, it achieves 33 FPS with a minimum of 28 FPS. The consistent frame pacing, as evidenced by the similar ratios of minimum to average FPS, makes Medium the most predictable option for users who value stability over peak performance.

For users who prioritize visual fidelity and have a 1080p display, the Ultra preset at 61 FPS is acceptable, though the 72 FPS gap between Ultra and Low indicates that the visual improvements come at a significant performance cost. At 1440p, the Ultra preset at 39 FPS is borderline, and users should consider whether the graphical enhancements justify the 35% performance loss compared to High settings.