Red Dead Redemption 2

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a very specific performance profile in Red Dead Redemption 2, one defined by severe graphical limitations. The data indicates this combo is primarily suited for lower resolutions and settings, as the integrated graphics solution becomes the overwhelming bottleneck. Benchmark results show that while the CPU is capable, the Arc B370’s performance ceiling is reached quickly, making this pairing a study in imbalanced hardware rather than a high-performance gaming setup.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a stark reality: this configuration struggles to maintain playable framerates at higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 47 FPS. This is the peak performance for the entire dataset. Moving to 1440p at the same Low settings, the average drops to 35 FPS, a significant 25.5% decrease. At 4K, the Low preset yields only 23 FPS, which is roughly half the 1080p Low result. This steep decline indicates that the limiting factor is overwhelmingly the GPU, as the rendering load increases exponentially with pixel count.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings. For the Medium preset, the average FPS goes from 35 at 1080p, down to 26 at 1440p, and finally to 17 at 4K. This shows a clear linear regression tied directly to resolution. The High preset follows a similar path: 29 FPS at 1080p, 22 FPS at 1440p, and 14 FPS at 4K. The data suggests that the Arc B370’s compute units and memory bandwidth are saturated even at 1080p, and any additional pixel workload results in a disproportionate performance hit. This is not a scenario where the CPU is waiting on the GPU; rather, the GPU is fully occupied and cannot keep up with the demands of higher resolutions.

The fact that the difference between 1080p and 4K at Low settings is 24 FPS (47 to 23) highlights the GPU’s limited pixel throughput. In a more balanced system, you would see a smaller performance gap between these resolutions, as the CPU would eventually become the limiting factor. Here, the data indicates the opposite: the GPU is so constrained that even reducing resolution does not yield the large FPS gains one might expect from a discrete graphics card. The Arc B370’s 20 ROPs and 40 TMUs are simply insufficient for the fill-rate demands of 4K in this title.

FAQ

Q: What is the best-case average FPS for this combo in Red Dead Redemption 2?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 47, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Red Dead Redemption 2?

A: The data shows it cannot provide a playable experience. At 4K, average FPS ranges from 10 on Ultra to 23 on Low, meaning even the lowest settings fail to reach a stable 30 FPS threshold.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset averages 47 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 21 FPS. This represents a 26 FPS drop, indicating that the Ultra preset demands more than double the graphical processing power of the Low preset.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F the bottleneck in this configuration?

A: No. The benchmark results strongly indicate the Intel Arc B370 is the primary bottleneck. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part, while the GPU is an integrated solution with a 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The FPS drops consistently with resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only minimum FPS values recorded are for the Medium preset: 15 FPS at 4K, 22 FPS at 1440p, and 30 FPS at 1080p. No minimums are listed for other presets.

Q: Given the performance, what type of user is this combo intended for?

A: Based on the data, it is suitable for playing at 1080p with Low settings to achieve a playable framerate, or for leveraging the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance for non-gaming tasks. It is not intended for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming in this title.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 plays the definitive role in shaping this game's performance, and it is a limiting one. The GPU’s specifications explain the benchmark outcomes. With a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, the chip’s thermal and power envelope is clear. However, the most critical detail is the memory configuration: “System Shared.” This means the GPU relies on system RAM for its frame buffer, and its bandwidth is “System Dependent.” This architecture is a major contributor to the performance ceiling observed.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are also modest. It features 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. These numbers are low compared to dedicated gaming GPUs, resulting in a fill rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS. These figures align with the measured FPS. For a demanding game like Red Dead Redemption 2, these resources are quickly exhausted, leading to the low average framerates seen across all tested resolutions.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals being older integrated and entry-level discrete parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770. This context is crucial. The data shows it performs within the same range as these legacy components, confirming its position as a low-end solution. The fact that it relies on shared memory means that the CPU’s memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s) is also a factor, but the GPU’s raw processing power is the primary constraint. The 25 W TDP and IGP slot width confirm this is not a high-performance part, but rather a power-efficient solution for basic tasks.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined performance of the Ryzen 5 7400F and Arc B370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is ranked 2670 out of 2902 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations, a clear indication of its low gaming performance ceiling. This ranking is consistent with the FPS data, which shows the system struggling to maintain playable framerates in most scenarios. The combo rank is a direct reflection of the GPU’s limitations, as the CPU is a modern, capable processor that would rank much higher on its own.

The CPU’s individual performance, as shown by its 83rd percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 32750, is solid. It sits near rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, with a deltaPct of 0.1% and -0.2% respectively. This shows the 7400F is a competitive mid-range processor. However, when paired with the Arc B370, the system’s overall gaming performance is dragged down to the bottom percentile. This mismatch is the core takeaway from the combo rank. The CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is. The rank of 2670 out of 2902 suggests that almost any other dedicated graphics solution, even older ones, would likely produce a higher ranking in this specific game.

This data effectively demonstrates that the CPU’s potential is wasted in this pairing. The single-core performance of the Ryzen 5 7400F, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, is more than sufficient for gaming. Yet, the Arc B370 cannot translate that CPU capability into higher framerates. The combo ranking is a strong warning for anyone considering this pairing for gaming: the GPU will prevent the system from achieving its full potential.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's capabilities. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

• Low: 47 FPS average.
• Medium: 35 FPS average, with a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 40 FPS.
• High: 29 FPS average.
• Ultra: 21 FPS average.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably:

• Low: 35 FPS average.
• Medium: 26 FPS average, with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 30 FPS.
• High: 22 FPS average.
• Ultra: 16 FPS average.

At 3840x2160, the system is nearly overwhelmed:

• Low: 23 FPS average.
• Medium: 17 FPS average, with a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 20 FPS.
• High: 14 FPS average.
• Ultra: 10 FPS average.

The data shows a clear pattern. The only configuration that achieves a consistently playable framerate (above 30 FPS) is 1080p with Low settings. The Medium preset at 1080p is borderline, with an average of 35 FPS but a recorded minimum of 30 FPS, meaning it can dip below the smoothness threshold. Every other configuration falls below 30 FPS, making for a subpar experience in a game that requires precise aiming and smooth camera movement. The 4K results are all firmly in the single-digit to low-twenties range, confirming that 4K is not a viable option.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience is achieved with the Low preset at 1920x1080 resolution. This is the only configuration that delivers an average FPS (47) high enough to ensure a fluid and responsive experience, which is critical for a game like Red Dead Redemption 2 with its emphasis on exploration and gunplay. While the Low preset will reduce visual fidelity, the data shows it is the only way to avoid the sub-30 FPS stuttering seen in all other presets.

The Medium preset at 1080p is a secondary option for those who prioritize visual quality over absolute smoothness. It offers an average of 35 FPS, which is playable, but the minimum FPS of 30 indicates potential dips that could be noticeable. For users with a 1440p monitor, the Low preset is the only viable choice, yielding an average of 35 FPS, but the experience will be less consistent than at 1080p. Pushing to High or Ultra at any resolution is not recommended, as the average FPS drops below 30, leading to a sluggish and unenjoyable experience.

The data strongly suggests that users should not attempt to run this game at 4K with this hardware. The highest average FPS at 4K is 23 (Low preset), which is far below acceptable playability. In summary, the practical advice from the benchmark is clear: stay at 1080p and use the Low preset for the best balance of performance and visual quality. This setup will allow the game to run at a playable framerate, albeit with significant graphical compromises. The hardware is simply not equipped for higher demands in this specific title.