Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not is a demanding tactical shooter that stresses both CPU and GPU depending on the resolution and settings. For this analysis, the tested combination is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The benchmark data provides a full picture of how this combo handles the game, from 1080p Low to 4K Ultra, allowing for a detailed breakdown of performance scaling and component bottlenecks.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks at 1566 out of 2947 tested combos for Ready Or Not. This places the pairing in the upper-middle tier of all possible configurations, indicating that it is capable of providing a solid experience, but it is not at the absolute top end of performance. The data suggests that this setup is balanced enough to handle the game’s requirements, but users should have clear expectations about its limits at higher resolutions.

The CPU itself holds a strong position in the broader market, with an average benchmark score of 48995 and a percentile rank of 90 against all CPUs. This means the Core Ultra 5 245 outperforms the vast majority of processors available. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, which scores 49196 (a -0.4% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores 49228 (a -0.5% delta). The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is also closely matched with the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which scores 48698 (a 0.6% delta), and it leads the Intel Core i5-14600K, which scores 48618 (a 0.8% delta). These figures show that the CPU is not a weak link in the system, as it trades blows with high-end chips from both AMD and Intel.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639 and a percentile rank of 61 against all GPUs. Its closest competitors, based on average score, are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666 (a -0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (a 0.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (a 0.5% delta). While these rival GPUs have similar average scores, the RTX 4060 brings modern architecture features to the table. The overall combo rank suggests that while the GPU is decent, it is the primary factor preventing this system from reaching top-tier status in this particular game, especially when compared to the CPU’s strong standing.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features the AD107 chip. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, with memory clocked at 2125 MHz (effective 17 Gbps). These specifications define its raw capabilities for rendering frames in Ready Or Not.

The data clearly shows the GPU’s influence on performance as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the RTX 4060 is able to push very high frame rates, with the Low preset hitting 266 average FPS. This suggests that at 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom, and the CPU is likely the limiting factor. However, as the resolution climbs to 3840x2160, the GPU’s workload increases significantly. At 4K with the High preset, the average FPS drops to 70, and at Ultra, it plummets to 49. This steep decline is a direct result of the GPU struggling to fill the increased pixel count, despite having a high boost clock. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is also a relevant factor, as higher resolutions and settings in a game like Ready Or Not can demand more memory, potentially impacting performance if exceeded. The GPU’s transistor count of 18,900 million on a 5 nm process gives it the computational power to handle the game, but the memory bus width and VRAM size are clear bottlenecks at the highest settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Ready Or Not with this hardware?

A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At this resolution, the High preset delivers 133 average FPS, and the Medium preset delivers 146 average FPS, both of which are excellent for a smooth experience. While 1920x1080 offers higher frame rates, the visual fidelity at 1440p is a significant upgrade without sacrificing playability.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is extremely competitive. Its average benchmark score of 48995 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), showing a performance delta of only -0.4% and -0.5% respectively. It also outperforms the Intel Core i5-14600K, which scores 48618, by a 0.8% margin.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 a high-performing GPU compared to others?

A: The RTX 4060 has a percentile rank of 61 against all GPUs. This means it performs better than 61% of all GPUs. Its average score of 17639 is closely matched with the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666), showing a -0.2% delta, indicating that its synthetic benchmark performance is in the mid-range tier.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Ready Or Not?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160 with the High preset, the average FPS is 70, which is playable. However, at the Ultra preset, the average FPS drops to 49, which may not be smooth enough for a tactical shooter where reaction time is key. Lowering to the Medium preset at 4K provides 77 average FPS, which is a more comfortable level.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 168 average FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 94 average FPS. This represents a significant drop in performance, but the Ultra preset still provides a high frame rate that is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: Does the GPU’s memory bandwidth affect performance?

A: Yes. The RTX 4060 has a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s on a 128-bit bus. The data shows that as resolution increases, performance drops significantly, which is indicative of the GPU and its memory subsystem being a limiting factor. At 4K, the average FPS at High is 70, compared to 211 at 1080p High, showing the bandwidth constraints.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user’s target resolution and desired frame rate. For a competitive and smooth experience, prioritizing high frame rates is crucial. The data shows that the Medium preset offers a great balance between visual quality and performance. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset yields an average of 232 FPS with a minimum of 197 FPS, ensuring no noticeable dips below 60 FPS. This is an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Medium preset still provides a very fluid experience, averaging 146 FPS with a minimum of 124 FPS. This is likely the best overall experience for most players, as it offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining frame rates that are well above what is needed for a responsive feel. The High preset at 1440p is also viable, with an average of 133 FPS, but the minimum FPS is not recorded, so the Medium preset’s listed minimum provides more assurance of stability.

For users with a 4K display, the High preset is the only reasonable choice, as it delivers an average of 70 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as its 49 average FPS falls below the threshold for a comfortable gaming experience. The Low preset at 4K (88 average FPS) can be used, but it defeats the purpose of the high-resolution display. Therefore, the recommended settings are: for 1080p and 1440p, use the Medium preset; for 4K, use the High preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's performance across all settings and resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the system is clearly CPU-bound, as the GPU is not fully taxed. The Low preset yields an average of 266 FPS. The Medium preset provides an average of 232 FPS, with a minimum of 197 and a maximum of 267. The High preset averages 211 FPS. The Ultra preset, while still high, shows a notable drop to an average of 148 FPS, indicating that the GPU is starting to become more involved.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The Low preset averages 168 FPS. The Medium preset averages 146 FPS, with a minimum of 124 and a maximum of 168. The High preset drops to an average of 133 FPS. The Ultra preset shows a larger performance hit, averaging 94 FPS. This demonstrates that the GPU is becoming the primary performance limiter at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The Low preset averages 88 FPS. The Medium preset averages 77 FPS, with a minimum of 65 and a maximum of 88. The High preset drops to an average of 70 FPS. The Ultra preset severely limits performance, with an average of only 49 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows the heavy toll the game takes on the GPU.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU features 24 MB of shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. These specifications contribute to its strong performance in synthetic benchmarks, where it scores 32924 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4648 in single-core.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU’s role is most evident at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, reaching 266 FPS on Low. This suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with data faster than the GPU can render at this resolution. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, indicated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648, is crucial for game logic and physics, which can be demanding in a tactical shooter. However, as the resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU still needs to be fast enough to keep up with the GPU’s rendering demands, and the data shows that it does, as the frame rates at 4K are constrained by the GPU, not the CPU. The CPU’s high performance, ranking in the 90th percentile, ensures it does not hold back the system even at 4K, where the GPU is fully saturated. The processor’s average benchmark score of 48995 and its close match with high-end rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 show that it is more than capable of supporting the RTX 4060.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling of performance from 1080p to 4K directly illustrates the system’s component bottleneck. Comparing the High preset, the average FPS goes from 211 at 1920x1080, to 133 at 2560x1440, and finally to 70 at 3840x2160. This represents a 37% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 67% drop from 1080p to 4K. This steep decline is a classic sign of a GPU-limited scenario at higher resolutions.

At 1080p, the CPU is the primary limiter. The GPU has enough power to render frames faster than the CPU can process the necessary instructions, resulting in very high frame rates that are capped by the CPU’s capabilities. As we move to 1440p, the GPU’s workload increases, and it begins to become the limiting factor. The drop in FPS from 1080p to 1440p is significant, but the absolute frame rates remain high. However, at 4K, the GPU’s limitations are fully exposed. The pixel count quadruples compared to 1080p, and the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are not sufficient to maintain high frame rates. The average FPS at 4K High is 70, which is less than a third of the 1080p Low figure. The data clearly shows that the RTX 4060 is the bottleneck at 4K, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 provides ample headroom to support the GPU at lower resolutions. This analysis indicates that for the best experience, users should stick to 1440p or below to ensure the CPU and GPU are balanced, avoiding the severe performance penalty seen at 4K Ultra.