Ready Or Not

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers exceptional performance in Ready Or Not, with the data indicating a system capable of handling the tactical shooter at the highest refresh rates. The measured 1080p results exceed 500 FPS at low settings, while 4K Ultra remains above 90 FPS, positioning this combo as one of the top performers among the 3,714 tested configurations. The 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake processor, with its 3.60 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clock, provides ample computational headroom, while the RTX 5090’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensure that even the most demanding scenarios remain fluid. This analysis will systematically break down the CPU and GPU contributions, answer common questions, and provide a resolution-by-resolution look at the measured frame rates.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is built on the Alder Lake architecture, featuring 12 cores and 20 threads with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This hybrid design, combining performance and efficiency cores, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,838 and a Geekbench multicore score of 14,367. The processor’s 25 MB of shared L3 cache and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide the bandwidth necessary for feeding the RTX 5090, though the game’s CPU demands appear modest given the frame rates achieved.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU’s role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions where the GPU is less constrained. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 235 FPS (531 vs. 296), indicating that the CPU can maintain high instruction throughput even when the GPU is not the bottleneck. The single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,043 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,984, ensures that the game’s AI and physics calculations are processed without introducing frame time spikes. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,282 suggests that the processor scales well with the parallel workloads typical of modern game engines, which is crucial for maintaining stable frame rates during intense firefights with multiple AI opponents.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i7-12700KF’s average benchmark score of 35,365 places it nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-13700T (35,403, delta -0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-13600T (35,305, delta 0.2%). The benchmark results indicate that while the processor is not the top-tier option for this game, it comfortably exceeds the requirements, as the measured FPS at 1440p and above are consistently GPU-bound. The processor’s 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs further confirms its capability, ensuring that it does not become a limiting factor in this particular title.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the dominant component in this configuration, with its Blackwell 2.0 architecture and 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus providing a massive 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock of 2017 MHz and boost clock of 2407 MHz, combined with 21,760 shading units, deliver raw compute power that is evident in the measured FPS. The 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate ensure that the game’s detailed environments and lighting effects are rendered without compromise.

In Ready Or Not, the GPU’s influence is most pronounced at higher resolutions and settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 98, which is a 38% reduction from 4K High (139 FPS). This scaling demonstrates the GPU’s workload increasing with pixel count and visual fidelity. The 32 GB VRAM capacity is particularly relevant for this game, as it allows for the loading of high-resolution textures at Ultra settings without stuttering or texture pop-in, which is a common issue in tactical shooters with dense environments. The measured 4K Medium result of 153 FPS with a minimum of 130 FPS shows that even at high memory usage, the GPU maintains consistent frame delivery.

The RTX 5090’s benchmark scores further illustrate its dominance. A Passmark G3D score of 39,650 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 place it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (avg score 79,605, delta 0.3%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (avg score 78,940, delta 1.1%), are significantly behind in terms of gaming performance, though these are not direct consumer gaming counterparts. The RTX 5090’s 1,999 USD launch MSRP reflects its flagship status, and the data shows that it delivers accordingly, particularly in a game like Ready Or Not where frame rates at 1080p exceed 400 FPS on High settings.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Ready Or Not with this combo for the highest frame rate?*

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 531, which is the highest measured. For a balance of visual quality and performance, 1440p High offers 266 FPS, while 4K High provides 139 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5090’s 32 GB VRAM impact performance in this game?

A: The 32 GB GDDR7 memory with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth allows the GPU to handle Ultra settings at 4K without memory bottlenecks, as evidenced by the 98 FPS average at 4K Ultra. Lower VRAM cards would likely experience stuttering or reduced texture quality in similar scenarios.

*Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700KF a bottleneck for the RTX 5090 in Ready Or Not?*

A: Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is not a bottleneck. At 1080p, the FPS scales from 531 (Low) to 296 (Ultra), showing the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,211 suggests it can keep up with the GPU’s demands.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only measured minimum FPS values are for Medium settings: 130 FPS at 4K, 248 FPS at 1440p, and 394 FPS at 1080p. No minimum FPS data is available for Low, High, or Ultra settings.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 82nd out of 3,714 tested combos, placing it in the top 2.2% of all systems tested for Ready Or Not.

Q: What are the closest rival GPUs to the RTX 5090 based on average benchmark scores?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (delta 0.3%), NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (delta 0.6%), AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (delta 1.1%), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (delta -1.4%). These are not direct gaming equivalents but show the RTX 5090’s score proximity.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination ranks 82nd out of 3,714 tested combos in Ready Or Not, placing it in the top 2.2% of all systems. This high rank is primarily attributable to the GPU’s immense processing power, as the CPU is not the limiting factor in this game. The rank reflects the system’s ability to deliver playable frame rates even at 4K Ultra, where it achieves 98 FPS, and exceptional performance at lower resolutions.

When examining the combo’s rank against the individual component percentiles, the GPU’s 92nd percentile ranking (vs. all GPUs) is the driving force, while the CPU’s 85th percentile (vs. all CPUs) provides sufficient support. The 3,714 combos include a wide range of hardware, from entry-level to enthusiast, and this system’s 82nd position indicates it outperforms the vast majority of configurations. The gap between the top-ranked combos and this system is likely due to CPUs with higher single-thread performance or more cores, but the measured FPS shows that such differences do not materially impact Ready Or Not’s smoothness, especially at 1440p and above where the GPU is fully utilized.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display refresh rate and resolution preferences. For 1080p displays, the High preset at 421 FPS provides an excellent experience, with Ultra at 296 FPS still exceeding the refresh rates of most monitors. The Medium preset at 463 FPS with a minimum of 394 FPS is the most consistent option for ultra-high refresh rate displays, as it offers a 42 FPS improvement over High while maintaining a high minimum frame rate.

At 1440p, the High preset (266 FPS) is recommended for most users, as it balances visual quality with performance, while Ultra (187 FPS) remains playable. For 4K displays, the High preset (139 FPS) is the sweet spot, as it provides a smooth experience on 120Hz displays. The Medium preset at 4K (153 FPS, min 130 FPS) is also viable for those with 144Hz displays, though the visual fidelity trade-off may be noticeable. The Ultra preset at 4K (98 FPS) is only recommended for users with 60Hz displays or those prioritizing visual fidelity over frame rate. The Low preset, while offering the highest FPS at all resolutions, is not recommended as it significantly reduces the visual quality of the tactical shooter’s environments and enemy visibility.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system’s performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 531 (Low) to 296 (Ultra), with Medium at 463 (min 394, max 533) and High at 421. The 1080p results show that the system is heavily GPU-bound, as the 235 FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings highlights the GPU’s workload scaling with graphical fidelity.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 335 (Low), 292 (Medium, min 248, max 336), 266 (High), and 187 (Ultra). The 1440p results demonstrate a more pronounced drop-off at Ultra settings, with a 79 FPS reduction from High, indicating that the game’s Ultra preset introduces significant graphical effects that tax the GPU. At 3840x2160, the averages are 175 (Low), 153 (Medium, min 130, max 176), 139 (High), and 98 (Ultra). The 4K Ultra result of 98 FPS is the lowest measured, but it remains playable, and the 77 FPS difference between Ultra and Low at 4K shows the GPU’s capability to handle the increased pixel count.

The data shows a clear trend: the RTX 5090 delivers playable frame rates at all settings, but the Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that drops below 100 FPS. The Medium preset consistently provides the highest minimum FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay during intense scenes.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is a critical indicator of the system’s bottleneck. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 421 (1080p) to 266 (1440p) to 139 (4K), representing a 50% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This scaling pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, where the RTX 5090’s workload increases with pixel count, and the CPU’s role diminishes.

The Low settings show a similar trend: 531 FPS at 1080p, 335 FPS at 1440p, and 175 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 37% (1080p to 1440p) and 67% (1080p to 4K), which is less severe than at High settings, indicating that the GPU is still the limiting factor but with more headroom at lower graphical loads. The Ultra settings exhibit the sharpest drop: 296 FPS at 1080p, 187 FPS at 1440p, and 98 FPS at 4K, with a 50% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K.

This resolution scaling analysis indicates that the limiting component is overwhelmingly the GPU. The CPU’s performance, as measured by its benchmark scores (e.g., Cinebench R23 multicore 28,838), is sufficient to maintain high frame rates even at 1080p, where the CPU load is typically highest. The data suggests that users with 1080p displays are heavily GPU-bound, while 4K users are also GPU-bound but with the GPU working at its limits, as evidenced by the 98 FPS Ultra result. The RTX 5090’s 32 GB VRAM ensures that no memory-related stuttering occurs at any resolution, further confirming that the GPU’s compute capability, not memory capacity, is the primary determinant of frame rate.