Ready Or Not

The Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pairing in Ready Or Not delivers a high-refresh-rate experience that is heavily dictated by the resolution and preset chosen. The data shows this combination ranks in the 72nd percentile of all tested combos, placing it in a strong position for a tactical shooter where target acquisition and smoothness are critical.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combo in Ready Or Not?*

A: The combo ranks 1056 out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the top 28% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-9400 compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2254. It is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-1068NG7 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, as the data shows delta percentages of -0.2% and 0.4%, respectively, indicating negligible performance differences.

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable at 1080p with this setup?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 311 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. For a more visually demanding experience, the Ultra preset still yields a very high 203 FPS average.

Q: Is this configuration capable of handling 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the data indicates it can. At 3840x2160, the High preset achieves an average of 95 FPS, and the Medium preset hits 105 FPS, both of which are well above the standard 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from High to Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The average frame rate drops from 183 FPS on High to 128 FPS on Ultra at 2560x1440. This represents a 30% reduction in average FPS, showing that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU in this configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti had a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-9400 is a 6-core, 6-thread processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and can boost up to 4.10 GHz, which is the primary driver for its performance in a game like Ready Or Not that relies on strong single-core throughput for game logic and AI. The processor’s 9 MB of shared L3 cache and support for dual-channel DDR4 memory with 42.7 GB/s of bandwidth provide a solid foundation for feeding the high frame rates requested by the GPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU scores 935 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 6629 in multi-core, placing it at the 47th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 2254 puts it in a tight cluster with rivals such as the Intel Core i7-10710U and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, with performance deltas of less than 0.5%. This indicates that while the processor is not a top-tier performer, it is not a bottleneck in this specific pairing for Ready Or Not at higher resolutions where the GPU is under heavier load.

The measured frame rates support this assessment. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 311 FPS, which is likely near the CPU’s limit for generating frames. However, as resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to 230 and 120 on Low settings, respectively, showing a clear shift in bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU. The 6 threads of the i5-9400 are sufficient for the game’s demands, as the data does not show a significant frame rate collapse that would indicate a thread saturation issue, even at the lower resolution where CPU load is highest.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant component in this configuration, providing the vast majority of the graphical horsepower. It is built on the Ampere architecture with 10240 shading units and 80 RT cores, and it features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a massive 912.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU’s boost clock of 1665 MHz allows it to sustain high throughput, which is essential for the detailed environments and lighting effects in Ready Or Not.

The GPU’s performance percentile is 83, meaning it outperforms 83% of all GPUs in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 41187 places it just slightly above the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and slightly below the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB, with delta percentages of 0.8% and -1.2% respectively. This data confirms that the RTX 3080 Ti is a high-end card capable of handling the most demanding modern titles.

The impact of the GPU is most evident at 4K resolution. At 3840x2160, the card drives an average of 120 FPS on Low settings and 95 FPS on High settings. The step from High to Ultra at this resolution is substantial, with the average dropping from 95 FPS to 67 FPS. This demonstrates that while the card is powerful, the Ultra preset at 4K is a heavy load that pushes it to its limits. The 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for this title, as the data does not indicate any memory-related performance cliffs at these settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the context of Ready Or Not, this CPU and GPU combination holds the 1056th position out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the 72nd percentile, indicating that it performs better than the majority of systems tested for this game. This is a strong result, especially considering that the CPU is a lower-tier part from an older generation compared to the GPU.

The ranking suggests that the RTX 3080 Ti is able to compensate for the i5-9400’s modest processing power in this title. The data shows that the combination is capable of delivering high frame rates even at demanding settings, which is not always the case for pairings with a significant generational gap. The rank of 1056 is more reflective of the GPU’s high-end standing in the overall database than the CPU’s mid-range placement, as the performance at higher resolutions is heavily GPU-bound.

This positioning means that users with this setup should expect a smooth experience in Ready Or Not at most settings, but they will not see the absolute top-tier performance achieved by combinations with newer high-core-count CPUs. The 72nd percentile ranking is a solid endorsement for the balance of this specific pairing, suggesting it is well-suited for the game’s requirements.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this system scales across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the system is clearly CPU-bound at lower settings. The average frame rate starts at 311 FPS on Low, decreases slightly to 297 FPS on Medium, and then drops to 287 FPS on High. The Ultra preset sees a more significant drop to 203 FPS, indicating a shift towards a GPU limitation.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on more of the workload. The Low preset still achieves 230 FPS, but the gap between presets widens. Medium averages 201 FPS with a minimum of 171 FPS, while High averages 183 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 128 FPS, which is a 44% reduction from the Low setting, showing that the higher resolution amplifies the cost of the Ultra preset's graphical enhancements.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The Low preset yields 120 FPS, Medium drops to 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS, and High averages 95 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 67 FPS, which is still playable but represents a significant compromise for visual fidelity. The data shows a consistent pattern: the gap between Low and Ultra grows from 108 FPS at 1080p to 53 FPS at 4K, highlighting the increasing strain on the GPU as resolution rises.

Settings Recommendations

For players seeking the highest possible frame rates, particularly for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset at 1920x1080 is the clear choice, delivering 311 FPS average. Even at 2560x1440, the Low preset provides a very high 230 FPS average, which is more than sufficient for most high-refresh-rate displays. This preset maximizes the responsiveness of the game, which is critical in a tactical shooter where split-second reactions are essential.

For a balance of visual quality and performance, the High preset at 2560x1440 is an excellent choice, offering an average of 183 FPS. This provides a significant improvement in graphical fidelity over Low while still maintaining a frame rate well above what most 144Hz monitors can display. At 3840x2160, the High preset is also viable, with an average of 95 FPS, which is smooth enough for a satisfying experience on a 4K display.

The Ultra preset is the most demanding option and should be reserved for systems with the highest refresh-rate 1080p monitors, where it achieves 203 FPS. At 1440p and 4K, the Ultra preset’s performance cost is steep, dropping to 128 FPS and 67 FPS respectively. Given the data, the Medium preset at 4K, with an average of 105 FPS and a minimum of 89 FPS, provides a more consistent experience than Ultra, making it a better choice for maintaining smooth gameplay at that resolution.