Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not is a tactical shooter where frame pacing and visibility under stress matter more than raw eye candy, and the Intel Core i5-11400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a combination that ranks in the 346th position out of 3,714 tested combos in this database. That places this pairing in the top 10% of all systems evaluated for this specific title, indicating a highly capable setup that should handle the game’s demanding AI-driven scenarios without bottlenecking the visual experience. The data shows a strong synergy between the six-core Rocket Lake processor and the Ada Lovelace flagship, though the measured results reveal that the CPU becomes a limiting factor as resolution drops, while the GPU takes over the workload at higher settings and pixel counts.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 346 out of 3,714 tested configurations places this specific CPU-GPU pairing in the 90.7th percentile of all systems benchmarked for Ready Or Not. This is a strong showing, but it is not near the top of the leaderboard, which suggests that while the RTX 4080 provides exceptional graphics horsepower, the Core i5-11400F holds the system back from achieving the absolute highest frame rates possible with this GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 17,177 puts it in the 71st percentile among all processors, and its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7H12 (0.3% faster), the Intel Core i5-12450H (0.4% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (0.6% slower). These small deltas indicate that the 11400F is performing right at its expected level, with no silicon lottery luck or thermal throttling skewing the results.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU’s single-threaded performance is adequate for gaming, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 868 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,024, which translates to solid responsiveness in game logic and AI calculations. However, the multi-threaded scores tell a different story when paired with such a high-end GPU: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,340 and a Passmark multithread score of 16,908 are respectable for a 6-core/12-thread part, but they do not provide the headroom that a more modern 8-core or 12-core processor would offer. In Ready Or Not, which is known for its CPU-intensive AI pathfinding and squad-based simulations, this means the 11400F will be the primary constraint at lower resolutions, while the RTX 4080’s 86th percentile GPU ranking (average score 54,247) ensures that visual settings can be pushed to maximum without the graphics card breaking a sweat.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 plays the dominant role in this pairing, equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. This VRAM capacity is more than sufficient for Ready Or Not at any resolution, ensuring that high-resolution textures and detailed environments do not cause stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU’s boost clock of 2,505 MHz, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with the AD103 chip, provides the raw compute power needed to maintain high frame rates, with an FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s. These specifications allow the RTX 4080 to handle the game’s dynamic lighting and shadow effects without compromising performance, even at 4K resolution.

In terms of API support, the RTX 4080 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, all of which are relevant for modern game engines. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU scales well with settings changes: at 4K, the average frame rate drops from 155 FPS on Low to 86 FPS on Ultra, a 44.5% reduction that reflects the increased shading and texture workloads. At 1080p, the same settings change results in a drop from 447 FPS on Low to 261 FPS on Ultra, a 41.6% reduction, indicating that the GPU is still the dominant factor even at lower resolutions. The RTX 4080’s 112 ROPs and 304 TMUs provide ample fill rate and texture throughput, ensuring that the game’s environments remain crisp and responsive, while the 76 RT cores are available for any ray-traced effects that may be enabled in future updates or mods.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-11400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 in Ready Or Not?

A: Yes, but only at lower resolutions and settings. Benchmark results show that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 447 FPS, which is CPU-limited. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,619 and single-thread score of 868 indicate that it cannot feed the GPU fast enough at these high frame rates, capping performance below what the RTX 4080 could theoretically deliver. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 86 is more GPU-bound, as the resolution and settings increase the graphics workload.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 have, and is it enough for Ready Or Not?

A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. This is more than adequate for Ready Or Not at any resolution or setting, as the game does not appear to require more than 8-10 GB even at 4K Ultra based on the measured frame rates. The high bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and level loading do not cause hitches.

Q: What is the best resolution to run this combo at for a balance of visuals and performance?

A: The data shows that 1440p High settings provide 235 FPS average, which is excellent for a tactical shooter where smoothness is critical. This resolution also takes better advantage of the GPU’s capabilities than 1080p, where the CPU limits performance to 372 FPS on High. At 4K High, the average drops to 123 FPS, which is still playable but requires a high refresh rate monitor to fully utilize.

Q: How does this combo compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER in terms of GPU performance?

A: The RTX 4080’s average benchmark score of 54,247 is only 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080 SUPER’s score of 54,209, making them statistically identical in performance. In real-world gaming, the difference would be negligible, and the measured FPS for this combo would likely be within 1-2 frames per second of a system using the SUPER variant.

Q: Does the CPU’s lack of integrated graphics affect the experience?

A: No, because the RTX 4080 provides all video output. The 11400F has no integrated graphics, but this is irrelevant for a gaming system with a dedicated GPU. The CPU’s 65W TDP and 14 nm process node do not impact gaming performance, though they do mean higher power consumption compared to newer, more efficient parts.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming at maximum settings?

A: Yes, but with a caveat. The measured 4K Ultra average FPS is 86, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play, but it is not high enough for 120Hz or 144Hz displays. If you want to run 4K at maximum settings with higher frame rates, you would need to lower settings to High (123 FPS) or Medium (135 FPS) to get closer to 120 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a clear picture of how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are exceptionally high across the board: Low settings yield 447 FPS, Medium yields 409 FPS (with a minimum of 348 FPS and maximum of 471 FPS), High yields 372 FPS, and Ultra yields 261 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-limited, as the RTX 4080 is capable of far more than 447 FPS in this game, but the 11400F cannot maintain a high enough frame delivery rate. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 186 FPS, or a 41.6% reduction, which is significant but still leaves the game playable on any monitor, including 360Hz esports panels.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a more balanced workload between CPU and GPU. Low settings produce 296 FPS, Medium produces 258 FPS (minimum 220 FPS, maximum 297 FPS), High produces 235 FPS, and Ultra produces 165 FPS. The reduction from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 131 FPS, or 44.3%, which is similar to the 1080p drop, indicating that the GPU is now contributing more to the performance bottleneck. The minimum FPS of 220 FPS on Medium settings suggests that even in intense firefights with multiple AI enemies, the system maintains smooth frame pacing without dropping below the refresh rate of most 144Hz monitors.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, as expected. Low settings yield 155 FPS, Medium yields 135 FPS (minimum 115 FPS, maximum 155 FPS), High yields 123 FPS, and Ultra yields 86 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 69 FPS, or 44.5%, which is consistent with the other resolutions, but the absolute numbers are lower due to the increased pixel count. The minimum FPS of 115 FPS on Medium settings at 4K is notable, as it indicates that even at this demanding resolution, the system rarely drops below 115 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS for most players.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling behavior of this combo reveals important insights into which component is the bottleneck at each setting. When moving from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 33-34% (e.g., 372 FPS to 235 FPS on High, a 36.8% reduction). This is a larger drop than the 25% increase in pixel count would suggest, indicating that the CPU is still partially limiting performance at 1080p, and the GPU is not fully utilized until the resolution increases. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 447 FPS, which is likely near the maximum that the 11400F can feed the GPU, while at 1440p Low, the FPS drops to 296, a 33.8% reduction that aligns more closely with the GPU’s rendering capabilities.

Continuing from 1440p to 4K, the average FPS drops by approximately 47-48% across settings (e.g., 235 FPS to 123 FPS on High, a 47.7% reduction; 165 FPS to 86 FPS on Ultra, a 47.9% reduction). This drop is more than the 2.25x increase in pixel count from 1440p to 4K, which suggests that the GPU is now the sole limiting factor, and the CPU has enough headroom to keep up with the increased graphics workload. The fact that the FPS reduction from 1440p to 4K is consistent across all settings (around 47-48%) confirms that the RTX 4080’s rendering pipeline is the bottleneck at 4K, while the 11400F is not causing any additional frame drops.

The bottleneck shift is clear: at 1080p, the CPU limits performance to a maximum of 447 FPS, while the GPU could theoretically push higher. At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU, but the CPU still has some influence. At 4K, the GPU is fully saturated, and the CPU’s performance is no longer a factor, as evidenced by the fact that the FPS scales consistently with settings changes. For players with high refresh rate monitors (240Hz or higher), 1080p and 1440p will show the CPU’s limitations, while 4K monitors (120Hz or higher) will be well-served by the GPU’s performance, especially on High or Medium settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on your display’s refresh rate and resolution. For 1080p displays with a 360Hz refresh rate, Low settings (447 FPS) are the only way to fully utilize the monitor, but Medium settings (409 FPS) offer a better visual experience while still staying above 360 FPS. For 1440p displays with a 144Hz or 165Hz refresh rate, High settings (235 FPS) provide an excellent balance of visual fidelity and frame rate, easily exceeding the refresh rate of most monitors, while Ultra settings (165 FPS) still provide a smooth experience on 144Hz panels. The minimum FPS of 220 FPS on Medium settings at 1440p ensures that even the most chaotic scenes remain fluid.

For 4K displays, the recommendation is more nuanced. Ultra settings (86 FPS) are playable but do not take full advantage of high refresh rate displays. High settings (123 FPS) are the sweet spot for 120Hz 4K monitors, providing a 30% performance boost over Ultra with minimal visual differences in a tactical shooter where visibility is key. Medium settings (135 FPS) offer even more headroom, but the visual downgrade from High may be noticeable in dark environments. Given that Ready Or Not is a game where spotting enemies quickly is critical, the data suggests prioritizing frame rate over maximum visual quality, making High settings at 4K the best overall choice for competitive play, while Ultra is acceptable for single-player or co-op sessions where immersion takes precedence over responsiveness.

The measured minimum FPS values on Medium settings at all resolutions (348 FPS at 1080p, 220 FPS at 1440p, 115 FPS at 4K) indicate that this preset provides the most stable frame pacing, making it a safe recommendation for players who experience frame drops in intense firefights. However, the differences between Medium and High are relatively small (e.g., 409 FPS vs 372 FPS at 1080p, 258 FPS vs 235 FPS at 1440p, 135 FPS vs 123 FPS at 4K), so High settings are generally preferred for the improved visual clarity without a significant performance penalty. Ultimately, the choice comes down to your monitor’s refresh rate: if you have a 144Hz or 165Hz display, High settings at 1440p or 4K are the recommended starting point, while Ultra should be reserved for players who prioritize graphics over frame rate and have a display with a lower refresh rate.