Ready Or Not
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 63 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 32 | 38 | 40 |
| 1440p QHD | 41 | 61 | 65 | 77 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 96 | 104 | 118 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Ready Or Not with Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 580, In-Depth Analysis
The data for Ready Or Not with the Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 580 reveals a pairing that is heavily dependent on resolution and settings to find a playable sweet spot. This combination sits at rank 1636 out of 1748 tested combos, placing it in the lower quartile of performance for this title. The benchmark results indicate a system that excels at 1080p but struggles significantly as the pixel count increases, with the GPU clearly becoming the primary bottleneck in most scenarios.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a dramatic and predictable decline as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 95.9 FPS at 1080p to 61.3 FPS at 1440p, and then plummets to 31.8 FPS at 4K. This represents a 67% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K at High settings, a stark illustration of how demanding higher resolutions are on the rendering pipeline.
The scaling pattern suggests that the AMD Radeon RX 580 is the limiting component at higher resolutions. The transition from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings shows a drop from 65.4 FPS to 37.5 FPS, which is a 43% decrease. This steep falloff is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of fillrate and memory bandwidth, as the Polaris 20 chip struggles to process the increased pixel workload. The 256-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are simply insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering in this tactical shooter.
Interestingly, the gap between resolutions narrows at the Low preset. At Low, the frame rate goes from 118.3 FPS at 1080p to 77.1 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 39.7 FPS at 4K. While the percentage drop is still significant, the absolute numbers suggest that at lower settings, the CPU begins to play a more substantial role at 1080p, as the frame rate ceiling appears to be approached. The data implies that for this combo, the sweet spot is clearly 1080p, where even Ultra settings can achieve a playable 64.7 FPS average.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame of 1636 out of 1748 places this system in the bottom 6% of all tested combinations for Ready Or Not. This is a low ranking that reflects the age and tier of both components. The Intel Core i5-10400F, while a capable 6-core, 12-thread processor, is not a high-end part, and the AMD Radeon RX 580 is an end-of-life GPU that was released in 2017. Together, they form a pairing that is outclassed by most modern systems in this demanding title.
This ranking is consistent with the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 53, meaning it performs better than only 53% of all GPUs in the database. The CPU fairs better with a percentileVsAllCpus of 73. The data suggests that while the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card, the overall combo is dragged down by the GPU's limitations, especially at higher resolutions. The nearest rivals for the GPU include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 with a deltaPct of 0 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 with a deltaPct of 0.1, showing that the RX 580 is performance-equivalent to those much older cards in general benchmarks.
For the CPU, the nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7552 with a deltaPct of 0.4 and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C with a deltaPct of -0.8. This indicates that the i5-10400F's average benchmark score of 14168 is essentially on par with a server-class EPYC chip and a low-power mobile Ryzen, which is an interesting quirk of the aggregate data. In the context of Ready Or Not, the low combo rank suggests that players will need to make significant compromises to achieve a smooth experience.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS rows, the most balanced experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 with High settings, yielding an average of 95.9 FPS. This provides a significant performance buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for smooth gameplay while maintaining a reasonable level of visual fidelity. The jump from High to Ultra at 1080p costs 31.2 FPS (from 95.9 to 64.7), a 33% performance hit for what is likely a marginal visual improvement in a game where clarity and visibility are key.
At 2560x1440, the data suggests that Low settings are the only reliable option for maintaining a high frame rate, with an average of 77.1 FPS. Choosing Medium at this resolution drops the average to 65.4 FPS, which may be acceptable for some, but High settings at 61.3 FPS begins to approach the edge of playability for a tactical shooter where reaction time is critical. Ultra at 1440p is not recommended, as the 40.7 FPS average is too low for a competitive experience.
For 3840x2160, the data is clear: this combo is not suited for 4K gaming. Even at Low settings, the average FPS is only 39.7, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The 20.5 FPS average at Ultra is effectively unplayable. The best experience at 4K would be to either lower the resolution or accept that the game will run at a reduced frame rate, making 1080p the definitive recommended resolution for this hardware.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Ready Or Not with this CPU and GPU combo?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 provides the highest frame rates across all settings, with even Ultra averaging 64.7 FPS. This is the only resolution where all presets are playable.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Ready Or Not?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 39.7 at Low settings, which is below the generally accepted 60 FPS standard. The Ultra preset drops to an unplayable 20.5 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14168, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD EPYC 7552 and 0.8% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C. Its single-thread score in 3dmark is 688.
Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 580 features 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with 8 Gbps effective speed.
Q: Is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra settings significant at 1080p?
A: Yes. The measured data shows a drop from 95.9 FPS at High to 64.7 FPS at Ultra, a reduction of 31.2 FPS. This suggests that High is the more efficient choice for maintaining a high frame rate.
Q: What is the overall performance ranking for this combo in this game?
A: The comboRankInGame is 1636 out of 1748 tested combinations, placing it in the lower percentile of systems tested for Ready Or Not.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 580 is the clear bottleneck in this system for Ready Or Not, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory is sufficient for most textures at 1080p, but the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a limiting factor at 1440p and 4K. The base clock of 1257 MHz and boost clock of 1340 MHz, combined with 2304 shading units, provide a raw compute capability of 6.175 TFLOPS, which is simply not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K.
The data shows a clear pattern: the frame rate at 4K Ultra is 20.5 FPS, while at 1080p Low it reaches 118.3 FPS. This 98 FPS spread is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load. The GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 53 indicates it is a mid-range performer overall, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 and GTX 950, which are significantly older architectures. The 14 nm Polaris 20 chip, with its 5,700 million transistors, is working hard in this game, but its 32 ROPs and 144 TMUs are insufficient for the pixel and texture throughput required by higher resolutions. The benchmark results indicate that lowering settings has a more pronounced effect on frame rate than lowering resolution, which suggests that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-10400F plays a supporting role in this combo, providing enough processing power to avoid being the main bottleneck at lower resolutions. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it offers solid multi-threading capabilities, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10297. The base clock of 2.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.30 GHz allow it to handle the game's AI and physics calculations without becoming a major limiting factor, especially at 1080p where the GPU is often the constraint.
The data suggests that the CPU becomes more relevant at 1080p Low, where the frame rate of 118.3 FPS is likely near the CPU's practical limit for this game. The CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 688 and 2-thread score of 1350 indicate modest per-core performance, which could be a slight bottleneck at very high frame rates. However, its percentileVsAllCpus of 73 shows that it is a better performer relative to its peers than the GPU is. The L3 cache of 12 MB (shared) and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for feeding the GPU. The CPU is not the reason this combo ranks at 1636; rather, it is the GPU's inability to scale with resolution that holds the system back. The data implies that upgrading the CPU alone would yield minimal gains in Ready Or Not, as the GPU would remain the limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across all resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are as follows: Low averages 118.3 FPS, Medium averages 103.7 FPS, High averages 95.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 64.7 FPS. This shows a clear progression where the cost of going from High to Ultra is significant.
At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 77.1 FPS, Medium at 65.4 FPS, High at 61.3 FPS, and Ultra at 40.7 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra widens here, with a 20.6 FPS difference. Finally, at 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 39.7 FPS, Medium at 37.5 FPS, High at 31.8 FPS, and Ultra at 20.5 FPS. Interestingly, the difference between Low and Medium at 4K is minimal (2.2 FPS), suggesting that the GPU is so heavily saturated that the settings have less impact. This breakdown confirms that the combo is best utilized at 1080p, where it can deliver a smooth experience, and that 4K is largely unplayable regardless of settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-10400F
AMD Radeon RX 580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 580 in Ready Or Not
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 39.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 37.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 31.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 20.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 77.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 65.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 61.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 40.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 118.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 103.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 64.7 |
Ready Or Not with ii5-10400F + Other GPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Ready Or Not with RX 580 + Other CPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-10400F + RX 580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.