Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
273
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 273 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 95 136 149 171
1440p QHD 182 260 286 327
1080p Full HD 289 411 452 519

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 171
3840x2160 Medium 149
3840x2160 High 136
3840x2160 Ultra 95
2560x1440 Low 327
2560x1440 Medium 286
2560x1440 High 260
2560x1440 Ultra 182
1920x1080 Low 519
1920x1080 Medium 452
1920x1080 High 411
1920x1080 Ultra 289

Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers exceptional performance in Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter where frame rate consistency can be as critical as raw speed. The measured data shows this pairing is capable of pushing the game to its limits, with results that scale predictably across resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the benchmark findings, focusing on the best settings, the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU, and how this specific combo ranks against the broader field of tested systems.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the High preset emerges as the clear recommendation across all tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the High preset produces an average of 136 FPS, which is a substantial 41 FPS higher than the Ultra preset’s 95 FPS at the same resolution. The drop from High to Ultra costs 41 FPS, a 30% reduction in frame rate, while the visual jump from High to Ultra is typically far less impactful in a fast-paced tactical shooter. The Medium preset, at 149 FPS, does offer a modest 13 FPS advantage over High at 4K, but this comes with a notable reduction in visual quality, particularly in shadow fidelity and texture detail, which can affect target acquisition in darker environments.

At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers an average of 260 FPS, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to 182 FPS, a significant 78 FPS penalty. While 182 FPS is still very playable, the High preset provides a smoother experience with a much larger margin above typical 144Hz or 240Hz display refresh rates. The data for Medium at 1440p shows 286 FPS, but again, the visual compromise is unnecessary given the High preset’s already excellent performance. At 1920x1080, the High preset achieves 411 FPS, which is an astronomical figure that far exceeds the refresh rate capabilities of even the most advanced gaming monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 289 FPS, still an excellent result, but the High preset’s 411 FPS ensures the absolute smoothest possible experience, leaving ample headroom for any background tasks or streaming software.

The Low preset offers the highest frame rates at every resolution—171 FPS at 4K, 327 FPS at 1440p, and 519 FPS at 1080p—but it is not recommended. The visual downgrade is severe, and the performance gain over High is not proportionate, especially at higher resolutions. For example, at 1440p, the jump from High to Low is 67 FPS, but the game will look noticeably worse, with reduced draw distances and simplified lighting. The High preset is the sweet spot, offering a robust visual experience with frame rates that are always well above the playable threshold. It provides the best experience per the measured rows, ensuring that the system’s hardware is fully utilized without sacrificing the visual clarity needed in a game where spotting a suspect through a doorway can be a matter of life or death for your squad.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the undisputed powerhouse in this configuration, and its role in Ready Or Not is defined by its massive 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and high clock speeds. The GPU’s memory operates at 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective, feeding a 384-bit bus for a total bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. This immense bandwidth is crucial for a game like Ready Or Not, which features detailed environments, dynamic lighting, and high-resolution textures that can quickly fill a frame buffer. The 24 GB capacity ensures that the game’s largest texture packs and highest resolution assets are stored locally on the GPU, preventing any stutter or texture pop-in that might occur with less well-endowed cards.

The RTX 4090’s compute capabilities are equally impressive. With 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, the card is built for raw throughput. Its boost clock of 2520 MHz and base clock of 2235 MHz are high for a GPU of this size, allowing it to sustain high frame rates even when the game’s engine throws complex shaders and post-processing effects at it. The card’s 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the key driver behind the high frame rates seen at 4K. The measured data shows that the GPU is the primary scaling factor when moving from Low to Ultra settings. At 4K, the average FPS drops from 171 on Low to 95 on Ultra, a 76 FPS reduction. This steep decline indicates that the increased graphical load—higher resolution shadows, more detailed reflections, and additional ambient occlusion effects—is being handled directly by the GPU’s compute and memory subsystems.

The RTX 4090’s 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores are also relevant, though Ready Or Not is not a title that heavily relies on ray tracing for its core gameplay. However, the presence of these dedicated cores means that if the game’s engine does use any ray-traced effects for lighting or reflections, the GPU can accelerate them without a significant performance penalty. The card’s 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth is particularly beneficial at 4K, where the sheer volume of pixel data being written and read is enormous. The benchmark results show that the RTX 4090 is never the bottleneck at 1080p, where the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, but its dominance becomes clear as resolution increases, where the GPU’s raw power is fully exercised. The 24 GB VRAM buffer also provides a significant advantage for future-proofing, as it can handle any upcoming texture-heavy titles or mods without issue.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested systems, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination holds a position of significant strength. The measured data places this combo at rank 117 out of 2947 total tested combos. This top 4% placement indicates that this pairing is in the upper echelon of gaming performance, with only a small fraction of systems delivering better results in Ready Or Not. This rank confirms the synergy between the 8-core, 16-thread CPU and the flagship GPU, a pairing that excels in a game that demands both high single-thread performance for game logic and immense multi-threaded power for rendering.

The combo’s rank is particularly impressive when considering the CPU’s benchmark scores. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22807 and a single-core score of 2228, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in overall CPU benchmark scores include the Intel Core i9-14900, which is only 0.5% slower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, which is 0.7% faster. This suggests that the 9850X3D is a top-tier processor, and when paired with the RTX 4090, which sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, the resulting combination is a force to be reckoned with. The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Arc Pro A60, are within a 0% delta, but the RTX 4090’s massive VRAM and clock speeds give it a clear edge in gaming workloads.

The rank of 117 out of 2947 also implies that while there are faster combos, they are rare and likely involve even more specialized or overclocked components. For the vast majority of users, this combination offers a level of performance that is not just sufficient but overwhelming for Ready Or Not. The data shows that the combo is capable of delivering high refresh rates at all resolutions, which is a direct result of the balanced partnership between the CPU’s fast Zen 5 architecture and the GPU’s massive computational throughput. The rank is a strong indicator that the system is not held back by any single component, and the measured FPS figures confirm that it can handle the game’s most demanding scenarios with ease.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how this combo performs across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the performance is staggering. The Low preset yields an average of 519 FPS, which is a figure that is almost theoretical for most games. Moving up the settings ladder, the Medium preset produces 452 FPS, with a minimum of 385 FPS and a maximum of 520 FPS. The High preset delivers 411 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 289 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound, as the GPU is barely breaking a sweat. The 230 FPS difference between Low and Ultra is substantial, but even the lowest number, 289 FPS, is far beyond what any current display can show.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 327 FPS, while Medium averages 286 FPS, with a minimum of 243 FPS and a maximum of 328 FPS. High settings produce 260 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 182 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is clear, with frame rates dropping by roughly 30-35% across all settings. This indicates that the GPU is starting to become more of a factor, but the CPU is still providing a solid foundation. The minimum FPS figures for Medium at 1440p, 243 FPS, are still exceptionally high, showing that the system maintains consistency even in demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, the true test of the system’s capabilities is revealed. The Low preset averages 171 FPS, Medium averages 149 FPS, with a minimum of 127 FPS and a maximum of 172 FPS, and High averages 136 FPS. The Ultra preset brings the system to its knees, producing an average of 95 FPS. This is the only scenario where the system drops below the 100 FPS mark, but 95 FPS is still a very playable frame rate for a tactical shooter. The 76 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K shows that the GPU is the dominant factor here, as the increased pixel count and graphical effects are fully taxing the RTX 4090’s resources. The minimum FPS of 127 at Medium 4K is notable, as it shows that even in the most intense firefights, the system does not stutter. The data across all resolutions shows a clear pattern: the system is capable of delivering high frame rates at any setting, but the user must make a trade-off between visual fidelity and raw FPS, with High being the optimal balance.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals a significant scaling in performance that highlights the system’s component balance. At the High preset, the average FPS drops from 411 at 1080p to 260 at 1440p, and finally to 136 at 4K. This represents a 67% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. This drop is substantial, but the absolute numbers remain high. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 151 FPS decrease, while the scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a 124 FPS decrease. This pattern suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, demanding significantly more memory bandwidth and shading power.

At the Low preset, the scaling is slightly different. The average FPS drops from 519 at 1080p to 327 at 1440p, and then to 171 at 4K. This is a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K as well, but the absolute drop is larger, at 348 FPS. This indicates that at Low settings, the CPU is doing more of the heavy lifting, as the GPU is not being fully utilized. The fact that the system can achieve 519 FPS at 1080p Low suggests that this is likely a CPU limit, as the GPU could theoretically render even more frames if the CPU could feed it data faster. The percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is 48%, while from 1080p to 1440p it is 37%, showing that the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck as resolution increases.

At the Medium preset, the scaling is smooth, with averages of 452 FPS at 1080p, 286 FPS at 1440p, and 149 FPS at 4K. The minimum FPS figures show a similar trend, with 385 at 1080p, 243 at 1440p, and 127 at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling, with 289 FPS at 1080p dropping to 182 FPS at 1440p and then to 95 FPS at 4K. The 194 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra is the largest absolute decrease, which is expected given the heavy graphical load. Overall, the resolution scaling analysis indicates that this combo is exceptionally well-balanced. At 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor, as evidenced by the high frame rates that far exceed monitor refresh rates. At 1440p, the system finds a sweet spot where both CPU and GPU are working in harmony. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, but the RTX 4090’s power ensures that frame rates remain high enough for a competitive experience. The limiting component at 4K is definitively the GPU, as the data shows a clear correlation between pixel count and FPS drop, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D plays a critical role in this system’s performance, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. This processor features 8 cores and 16 threads, built on the Zen 5 architecture using a 4 nm process. Its base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz are exceptionally high, giving it a significant advantage in single-threaded workloads that are common in game engines. The CPU’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a massive amount, and it is designed to reduce latency when accessing frequently used game data, such as level geometry and AI pathfinding information. This large cache is a key reason why the system can achieve frame rates like 411 FPS at 1080p High, as it allows the CPU to feed instructions to the GPU without delays.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its strength. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22807 and a single-core score of 2228 place it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, making it one of the fastest processors available for gaming. Its nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark rankings include the Intel Core i9-14900, which is only 0.5% slower in average benchmark score, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, which is 0.7% faster. These close margins show that the 9850X3D is at the very top of the performance heap. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 41318 and single-thread score of 4704 provide further evidence of its capabilities, with the single-thread score being particularly important for gaming.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU’s role is to handle the game’s simulation logic, including AI for suspects and civilians, physics calculations for bullet impacts and door breaching, and the overall game state management. The high boost clock of 5.60 GHz ensures that these tasks are completed with minimal latency, allowing for smooth and responsive gameplay. The measured FPS data at 1080p shows the CPU’s influence. The fact that the system can achieve 519 FPS at Low settings suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU is not being fully stressed at that resolution. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 230 FPS, which is a significant change, but the absolute numbers are so high that the CPU is still doing its job effectively. The system’s 16 threads are also beneficial, as Ready Or Not can utilize multi-threading for tasks like rendering the game world and processing audio, ensuring that no single core becomes a bottleneck.

The CPU’s memory support for DDR5 and its dual-channel architecture, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, ensures that the CPU can quickly access the data it needs, feeding the GPU without interruption. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 interface, supporting 24 lanes, provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 4090 to communicate with the rest of the system. Overall, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a perfect match for the RTX 4090. It provides the necessary single-thread power to drive high frame rates at 1080p, while its multi-threaded capabilities ensure that the system remains responsive even when the GPU is fully loaded at 4K. The data shows that this CPU is not holding back the GPU at any resolution, and its performance is a key reason why this combo ranks so highly in the database.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 450 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 171.0
3840x2160 Medium 149.0
3840x2160 High 136.0
3840x2160 Ultra 95.0
2560x1440 Low 327.0
2560x1440 Medium 286.0
2560x1440 High 260.0
2560x1440 Ultra 182.0
1920x1080 Low 519.0
1920x1080 Medium 452.0
1920x1080 High 411.0
1920x1080 Ultra 289.0

Ready Or Not with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 4090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.