Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
247
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 247 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 86 123 135 155
1440p QHD 165 235 258 296
1080p Full HD 261 372 409 469

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 155
3840x2160 Medium 135
3840x2160 High 123
3840x2160 Ultra 86
2560x1440 Low 296
2560x1440 Medium 258
2560x1440 High 235
2560x1440 Ultra 165
1920x1080 Low 469
1920x1080 Medium 409
1920x1080 High 372
1920x1080 Ultra 261

Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers exceptional performance in Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter where precision and frame pacing matter as much as raw firepower. This pairing leverages an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor with a 96 MB shared L3 cache and a 16 GB GDDR6X GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The measured frame rates across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions show a system that not only exceeds 60 FPS at every tested setting but also pushes well past 200 FPS in many configurations, making it a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate monitors. The data indicates that this combo ranks 246th out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the top 7% of all systems evaluated for this game. What follows is a detailed breakdown of how each component contributes to these results, practical answers to common questions, and a settings guide based on the measured performance.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm process from TSMC, with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 4.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.20 GHz, and it carries a 120 W TDP. The processor features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is particularly relevant for a game like Ready Or Not, which involves complex AI routines, destructible environments, and numerous simultaneous entities. The benchmark data shows strong synthetic scores: Cinebench R23 multicore hits 23230, single-core reaches 2080, and Geekbench multicore is 18696 with a single-core score of 2964. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 10081, while the max-thread score is 10067, indicating near-linear scaling across all threads.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 9800X3D sits in a tight performance band. Its average benchmark score is 39768, placing it just 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (39603) and 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (39485). It trails the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048) by 0.7% and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (40081) by 0.8%. These tiny deltas suggest that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 9800X3D is essentially neck-and-neck with these alternatives, though its 96 MB L3 cache gives it a potential edge in games that benefit from large cache pools. The processor's percentile ranking of 87 among all CPUs reinforces that it is a high-end part, though not the absolute top.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU's role is significant because the game's tactical AI and physics calculations can become bottlenecks at high frame rates. At 1080p with Low settings, the measured average FPS is 469, which far exceeds what most displays can show. This suggests that at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU is not the limiting factor; instead, the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting. However, at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 86, the CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and 8 cores ensure that it can feed the GPU without stalling. The Passmark multithread score of 40009 and single-thread score of 4430 indicate a balanced part that handles both lightly-threaded game logic and heavily-threaded background tasks. For a tactical shooter where every millisecond of input latency matters, the 9800X3D's single-thread performance is crucial, and the data shows it is more than adequate for maintaining high frame rates even in chaotic firefights.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 uses the AD103 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The base clock is 2205 MHz, boosting to 2505 MHz, and the memory runs at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory provides 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for 4K textures and high-detail assets. The GPU's FP32 performance is 48.74 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. With a 320 W TDP and a suggested 700 W PSU, this is a power-hungry but capable card.

The RTX 4080's benchmark scores show it is a top-tier GPU. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6567, Geekbench OpenCL is 214739, and Geekbench Vulkan is 263779. Passmark G3D scores 34457, while GPU compute hits 20671. The average benchmark score is 54247, which places it 0.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER (54209) and 1.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828 — note this is actually higher, so it's a 1.1% deficit). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698) by 2.6% and the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757) by 2.7%. These deltas are small, meaning the RTX 4080 performs nearly identically to its closest competitors in synthetic tests. Its percentile ranking of 86 among all GPUs confirms it as a high-end card, though not the absolute fastest.

In Ready Or Not, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is a key advantage. Even at 4K Ultra settings, the game's textures and shadow maps do not appear to exceed this capacity, as evidenced by the stable frame rates. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 86 on Ultra to 155 on Low, with Medium hitting 135 and High at 123. The 22.4 Gbps effective memory speed and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth ensure that texture streaming and high-resolution rendering do not cause hitches. At 2560x1440, the RTX 4080 pushes average FPS from 165 on Ultra to 296 on Low, and at 1920x1080, it reaches 261 FPS on Ultra and 469 on Low. The card's boost clock of 2505 MHz is well-utilized in this game, as the measured FPS scales predictably with settings. The RTX 4080's 16 GB memory also future-proofs the system for mods or higher-resolution texture packs, though the data does not include such scenarios.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Ready Or Not?*

A: The combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 246th out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the top 6.6% of all systems evaluated for this game.

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves, and at what settings?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 469, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. The next highest is 409 FPS at 1080p Medium, followed by 372 FPS at 1080p High.

Q: Does this system maintain playable frame rates at 4K Ultra?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 86, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. For comparison, 4K Medium averages 135 FPS, and 4K Low averages 155 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 4080's average score is 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54209. This means they perform virtually identically in general benchmarks.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for Medium settings?

A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 115 at 3840x2160, 220 at 2560x1440, and 348 at 1920x1080. These minimums indicate that frame drops are moderate and the game remains responsive even during intense scenes.

Q: Does the CPU's cache size matter for this game?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is unusually large. While the measured FPS data does not isolate cache effects, the CPU's high single-thread score (2964 in Geekbench) and strong 3DMark multi-thread results (10081 at 16 threads) suggest it can handle the game's AI and physics loads without bottlenecking the GPU.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience for different priorities. If the goal is maximum visual fidelity and the display supports 4K, the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 delivers an average of 86 FPS. This is playable and visually rich, but it leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. For a more balanced experience at 4K, the High preset averages 123 FPS, which is smoother and still looks excellent. The Medium preset at 4K averages 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS, making it the best choice for those who want high frame rates without sacrificing too much visual quality. At 4K Low, the average rises to 155 FPS, but the visual downgrade is noticeable.

At 2560x1440, the situation changes. The High preset averages 235 FPS, which is ideal for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors. The Medium preset averages 258 FPS with a minimum of 220 FPS, providing excellent responsiveness. The Ultra preset averages 165 FPS, which is still very smooth and offers the best visuals. For competitive play, the Low preset at 1440p averages 296 FPS, ensuring the lowest input latency. At 1920x1080, the High preset averages 372 FPS, Medium averages 409 FPS, and Ultra averages 261 FPS. The Low preset hits 469 FPS, which is overkill for most displays but useful for extreme competitive scenarios.

The data suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot for most users. It offers a significant FPS boost over Ultra (135 vs 86 at 4K, 258 vs 165 at 1440p, 409 vs 261 at 1080p) while maintaining a minimum FPS that stays above 115 at 4K and 220 at 1440p. The visual difference between Medium and Ultra in Ready Or Not is typically limited to shadow quality, ambient occlusion, and texture filtering, which are less critical in a tactical shooter where visibility and clarity are paramount. If the display is 1440p, Medium or High are both excellent choices; if 4K, Medium provides the best balance of frame rate and visual quality. For those with 1080p monitors, High or Ultra are viable, but Medium offers the highest average FPS without hitting the 409 FPS ceiling that could cause screen tearing on standard 60 Hz displays.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The comboRankInGame field shows that this system ranks 246th out of 3714 tested combinations. This places it in the top 6.6% of all systems tested for Ready Or Not, which is an impressive result given the large number of possible CPU-GPU pairings. The rank reflects the combined performance of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and RTX 4080 across all measured resolutions and settings. To put this in perspective, the CPU's percentile rank among all CPUs is 87, and the GPU's percentile rank among all GPUs is 86. The combo rank of 246 suggests that while both components are individually high-performing, their synergy in this game is slightly better than what the percentiles alone might predict, likely due to the CPU's large L3 cache and the GPU's ample VRAM.

The nearest rival CPUs (AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Ryzen 7 7700) all have average benchmark scores within 0.8% of the 9800X3D, meaning that swapping the CPU would likely result in similar frame rates. Similarly, the nearest rival GPUs (RTX 4080 SUPER, Radeon Pro W5700X, Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, Radeon 8060S) are within 2.7% of the RTX 4080 in average score. This implies that the combo's rank is not unique to these exact parts; pairing the 9800X3D with an RTX 4080 SUPER or the RTX 4080 with a Ryzen 7 7700 would likely yield nearly identical performance. However, the 96 MB L3 cache of the 9800X3D and the 16 GB VRAM of the RTX 4080 are features that could provide an edge in specific game scenarios, such as large map loads or heavy texture streaming, which are not fully captured by synthetic benchmarks.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. All figures are average FPS unless otherwise noted, with minimum and maximum values provided for Medium settings.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are as follows:

  • High: Average 123 FPS.
  • Low: Average 155 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 135 FPS, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS.
  • Ultra: Average 86 FPS.

The 4K results show a clear progression: Low is fastest, Ultra is slowest, with High and Medium in between. The gap between Ultra (86 FPS) and Low (155 FPS) is 69 FPS, or 80% higher, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a significant rendering load. Medium's minimum of 115 FPS assures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the results are:

  • High: Average 235 FPS.
  • Low: Average 296 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 258 FPS, with a minimum of 220 FPS and a maximum of 297 FPS.
  • Ultra: Average 165 FPS.

At 1440p, all presets exceed 165 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most monitors. The difference between Low (296 FPS) and Ultra (165 FPS) is 131 FPS, or 79% higher. Medium's minimum of 220 FPS ensures no noticeable stutter even during intense firefights.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the results are:

  • High: Average 372 FPS.
  • Low: Average 469 FPS.
  • Medium: Average 409 FPS, with a minimum of 348 FPS and a maximum of 471 FPS.
  • Ultra: Average 261 FPS.

1080p is where the combo truly shines, with every preset exceeding 261 FPS. The Low preset reaches 469 FPS, which is nearly 470 FPS — a figure that would require a 480 Hz monitor to fully utilize. Medium's minimum of 348 FPS is exceptional, and even Ultra maintains 261 FPS, which is far beyond what most competitive players need.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset offers the most consistent performance with minimum FPS values that are at least 115 FPS at 4K, 220 FPS at 1440p, and 348 FPS at 1080p. The data also shows that the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM is never a bottleneck, as the 4K Ultra average of 86 FPS is still respectable. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 5.20 GHz boost clock and 96 MB L3 cache appear to prevent CPU-related frame drops, as the minimum FPS values for Medium are never disproportionately lower than the averages. This combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p, with 4K Ultra as a viable option for those who prioritize visuals over extreme frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5200 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2505 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 155.0
3840x2160 Medium 135.0
3840x2160 High 123.0
3840x2160 Ultra 86.0
2560x1440 Low 296.0
2560x1440 Medium 258.0
2560x1440 High 235.0
2560x1440 Ultra 165.0
1920x1080 Low 469.0
1920x1080 Medium 409.0
1920x1080 High 372.0
1920x1080 Ultra 261.0

Ready Or Not with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + RTX 4080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.