Ready Or Not
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 130 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 62 | 70 | 80 |
| 1440p QHD | 86 | 125 | 138 | 157 |
| 1080p Full HD | 137 | 197 | 217 | 247 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER produces a dataset that clearly delineates the boundaries of each component in Ready Or Not. At 1080p, the combination delivers exceptional frame rates that saturate high-refresh-rate displays, but the scaling curve to 4K reveals a steep performance cliff that shifts the bottleneck firmly onto the graphics card. This analysis examines the measured FPS rows to interpret what the resolution scaling means, how the CPU’s six-core architecture influences results, and which settings preset offers the most balanced experience.
Resolution Scaling
The measured data shows a dramatic reduction in average FPS as resolution increases, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario at higher pixel counts. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces 197.3 FPS, while the same preset at 2560x1440 drops to 124.5 FPS, a 36.9% reduction. Moving further to 3840x2160, the average falls to 62.4 FPS, which is 68.4% below the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the primary limiting factors as pixel throughput demands increase.
The Low preset scaling tells a similar story but with a higher absolute ceiling. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 246.7 FPS, which drops to 156.5 FPS at 1440p and 80.4 FPS at 4K. The gap between Low and High at each resolution is consistent—roughly 20% to 25%—suggesting that the GPU’s shading units and texture rate (283.2 GTexel/s) are the constraining resources rather than the CPU. Notably, the 4K Ultra preset yields only 45 FPS, which is the lowest measurement in the entire dataset and falls below the 60 FPS threshold typically desired for smooth tactical shooter gameplay.
The data indicates that the CPU’s role diminishes as resolution climbs. At 1080p, the Ryzen 5 7500F’s strong single-thread performance (974 in 3dmark_single_thread) allows the GPU to operate near its full potential, evidenced by the 246.7 FPS Low result. However, at 4K, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s raw compute (9.062 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the ceiling, and the CPU waits idly. This is a textbook example of resolution scaling: the frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is not linear but exponential, driven by the 4x increase in pixel count that overwhelms the GPU’s fill rate (113.3 GPixel/s) and memory subsystem.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Ready Or Not?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 246.7, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This drops to 197.3 FPS on High settings at the same resolution.
Q: Does the RTX 2070 SUPER maintain 60+ FPS at 4K?
A: Yes, but only on lower presets. The measured averages are 80.4 FPS on Low, 70.2 FPS on Medium, and 62.4 FPS on High at 3840x2160. The Ultra preset falls short at 45 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU’s core count affect performance in this game?
A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The data shows that at 1080p, where CPU overhead matters more, the combo reaches 246.7 FPS on Low, indicating the processor is not a bottleneck at that resolution. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Low settings yield 156.5 FPS, while Ultra drops to 86.2 FPS. This represents a 44.9% reduction in average frame rate from the lowest to the highest preset.
Q: Is this combo better suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming?
A: The data suggests both are viable. At 1440p High, the average is 124.5 FPS, which exceeds typical 60 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates. At 1080p High, the 197.3 FPS result is more than sufficient for high-refresh monitors.
Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark percentile compare to its in-game performance?
A: The RTX 2070 SUPER ranks in the 65th percentile among all GPUs in synthetic benchmarks, yet in Ready Or Not, the combo ranks 1078 out of 1748 tested combinations. This discrepancy highlights that the game’s demands are not fully captured by average benchmark scores.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz provide substantial single-thread headroom, which is critical for a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not where frame pacing and input responsiveness matter. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth (DDR5 dual-channel) help feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without becoming a constraint.
In the measured data, the CPU’s influence is most visible at 1080p. The jump from Low (246.7 FPS) to Ultra (136.7 FPS) at 1080p is an 44.6% drop, which is entirely attributable to the GPU’s workload increase, not the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s 3dmark_16_threads score of 6376 and cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799 indicate it can handle the game’s threading model with ease. Meanwhile, the passmark_single_thread score of 3841 confirms that the processor’s per-core performance is strong enough to avoid stutter in CPU-bound scenarios.
However, the CPU’s role is secondary once resolution rises. At 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus are the primary bottlenecks, as evidenced by the 45 FPS Ultra result. The CPU’s 12 threads are not fully utilized in this game, but the architecture’s low latency and high clock speed ensure that it never holds back the GPU at any preset. The nearest rival comparison reinforces this: the Ryzen 5 7500F’s average benchmark score of 24993 is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, showing it sits comfortably in the mid-range desktop segment without exotic power requirements (65 W TDP).
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide clear guidance for optimal settings based on resolution and refresh rate targets. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 136.7 FPS, which is still above the 120 FPS threshold for high-refresh gaming. However, the High preset at 197.3 FPS is the better choice for 144 Hz monitors, as it offers a 44.3% improvement over Ultra with only a modest visual quality reduction. The Medium preset at 217.4 FPS is ideal for 240 Hz displays, but the visual fidelity loss may not justify the frame rate gain for a tactical shooter where enemy visibility matters.
For 2560x1440 users, the High preset at 124.5 FPS is the sweet spot. It maintains playable frame rates above 120 FPS while preserving enough detail to spot distant threats. The Medium preset at 138.1 FPS is also viable for those prioritizing frame rate over eye candy, but the Ultra preset at 86.2 FPS is borderline—it is below the 90 FPS mark that some players consider minimum for smooth tracking. At 3840x2160, the High preset at 62.4 FPS is the highest quality option that stays above 60 FPS, while the Medium preset at 70.2 FPS provides a safer margin. The Ultra preset at 45 FPS is not recommended for competitive play, as the frame pacing will suffer in intense firefights.
The data shows a consistent pattern: the gap between Low and Medium is smaller than the gap between High and Ultra. For example, at 1440p, Low (156.5 FPS) to Medium (138.1 FPS) is an 11.8% drop, while High (124.5 FPS) to Ultra (86.2 FPS) is a 30.8% drop. This suggests that the Ultra preset imposes a disproportionately heavy load on the GPU’s shading units and RT cores (40 RT cores), which are taxed by advanced lighting effects. For the best balance of visual clarity and performance, the High preset is the recommended starting point across all resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
In the comprehensive database of tested combinations, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 7500F and RTX 2070 SUPER achieves a rank of 1078 out of 1748 combos specifically for Ready Or Not. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all tested systems, which is consistent with the GPU’s age (released in 2019) and its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The CPU, by contrast, ranks in the 82nd percentile among all processors, indicating that the system’s overall standing is dragged down by the graphics card.
The combo’s rank relative to other tested setups suggests that while the CPU is capable of pushing higher frame rates, the GPU limits the system to the observed FPS values. For context, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the NVIDIA RTX A400 (0.5% higher score) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (2.5% lower score). In Ready Or Not, the measured results place this combo well below top-tier configurations, but the 1080p High result of 197.3 FPS is respectable for a GPU that is two generations old.
The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates without compromising visual quality. At 4K, it struggles to maintain playable performance on Ultra settings, which aligns with its mid-range GPU classification. The CPU’s headroom means that upgrading the GPU in the future would yield immediate gains, as the Ryzen 5 7500F has the single-thread and multi-thread performance to support faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Ready Or Not
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 80.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 70.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 45.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 156.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 138.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 124.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 86.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 246.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 217.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 197.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 136.7 |
Ready Or Not with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Ready Or Not with RTX 2070 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + RTX 2070 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.