Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
262
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 262 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 104 148 163 187
1440p QHD 199 284 312 329
1080p Full HD 310 354 366 384

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 187
3840x2160 Medium 163
3840x2160 High 148
3840x2160 Ultra 104
2560x1440 Low 329
2560x1440 Medium 312
2560x1440 High 284
2560x1440 Ultra 199
1920x1080 Low 384
1920x1080 Medium 366
1920x1080 High 354
1920x1080 Ultra 310

Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D produces a striking performance profile in Ready Or Not, with frame rates that range from a playable 104 FPS at 4K Ultra to a blistering 384 FPS at 1080p Low. This combination of a Zen 2 six-core processor from 2019 and a Blackwell flagship GPU from 2025 creates a system where the measured results reveal both the strengths of the graphics card and the potential limits of the older CPU in a tactical shooter that rewards high refresh rates.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination in Ready Or Not shows that the High preset delivers the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, High produces an average of 354 FPS, which is only 30 FPS behind Low but offers substantially better visual fidelity. Moving to 2560x1440, High achieves 284 FPS, a 45 FPS drop from Low but still far above the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. At 3840x2160, High maintains 148 FPS, which is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay on 4K displays.

The Medium preset, which includes minimum and maximum FPS measurements in the data, shows interesting characteristics. At 1080p Medium, the system averages 366 FPS with a minimum of 311 FPS and a maximum of 421 FPS. The 1440p Medium result averages 312 FPS with a minimum of 265 FPS and a maximum of 359 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average drops to 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 187 FPS. These figures indicate that Medium provides a more consistent frame pacing than the extreme Low or Ultra settings, which lack minimum and maximum data points in the measurements.

The Ultra preset represents the most demanding configuration tested, and the results show a significant performance cost. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS drops to 310, which is 44 FPS lower than High. The gap widens at 1440p, where Ultra averages 199 FPS compared to High's 284 FPS, a 85 FPS difference. At 4K, Ultra falls to 104 FPS, which is 44 FPS below High and approaches the threshold where competitive players might notice reduced responsiveness.

For players prioritizing maximum frame rates, the Low preset offers the highest numbers: 384 FPS at 1080p, 329 FPS at 1440p, and 187 FPS at 4K. However, the difference between Low and High at 1080p is only 30 FPS, while the visual upgrade from Low to High is substantial in a game like Ready Or Not, where environmental detail and lighting play crucial roles in spotting threats. The data suggests that High is the optimal choice for most users, as it delivers frame rates that exceed the capabilities of virtually all consumer monitors while maintaining superior image quality.

The 4K resolution presents a special case where Medium becomes an attractive option. With 163 FPS average and a 139 FPS minimum, 4K Medium offers a smoother experience than 4K High's 148 FPS average, though the difference is modest. Players with 4K 144Hz displays would find both presets playable, but Medium's higher minimum FPS provides better assurance against frame drops during intense firefights.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU combination in Ready Or Not?

A: The measured data shows that 2560x1440 provides the best balance of performance and visual quality. At High settings, the system achieves 284 FPS, which is 130 FPS higher than 4K High but only 70 FPS lower than 1080p High. The 1440p resolution allows the RTX 5090 D to stretch its legs while the Ryzen 5 3600 keeps up with the game's demands.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High across different resolutions?

A: The performance penalty for Ultra is consistent and significant. At 1080p, Ultra averages 310 FPS versus High's 354 FPS, a 44 FPS difference. At 1440p, the gap widens to 85 FPS (199 vs 284). At 4K, Ultra averages 104 FPS compared to High's 148 FPS, a 44 FPS drop. The data indicates that Ultra is not worth the performance cost in this game.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 3600 bottlenecking the RTX 5090 D in this game?

A: The benchmark results suggest a CPU influence at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates range from 310 FPS at Ultra to 384 FPS at Low, with only a 74 FPS spread between presets. This relatively narrow gap, compared to the 83 FPS spread at 4K (104 to 187), indicates that the CPU limits maximum frame rates at 1080p while the GPU becomes more dominant at higher resolutions.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values recorded for this combination?

A: The data includes minimum FPS measurements only for the Medium preset. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 311 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the minimum drops to 265 FPS. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 139 FPS. No minimum values are provided for Low, High, or Ultra presets in the measured data.

Q: How does this system perform at 4K for a tactical shooter?

A: The system remains highly capable at 4K. High settings deliver 148 FPS average, which exceeds the refresh rate of most 4K gaming monitors. Even the demanding Ultra preset maintains 104 FPS, which is playable for a game where precision matters more than raw speed. The Low preset reaches 187 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU's headroom.

Q: Does the Medium preset offer better frame consistency than other settings?

A: The measured data includes minimum and maximum values only for Medium, showing a spread of 110 FPS at 1080p (311 to 421), 94 FPS at 1440p (265 to 359), and 48 FPS at 4K (139 to 187). This range suggests that Medium provides a stable experience, though the lack of comparable data for other presets prevents direct comparison.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Matisse, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache. In the context of Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter that emphasizes team coordination and environmental awareness, the CPU's role is to maintain consistent frame delivery and handle game logic, AI behavior, and physics calculations.

The benchmark data for the Ryzen 5 3600 shows solid synthetic performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15045 and a single-core score of 2124. The Geekbench results indicate a multicore score of 7372 and a single-core score of 1536. These figures place the processor in the 71st percentile among all CPUs tested in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17035. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1260P with a score of 17007 and a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core i5-11400 at 17067 with a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD EPYC 7742 at 16998 with a delta of 0.2%.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU's impact is most visible when analyzing the frame rate scaling across resolutions. At 1080p, where the GPU has less work to do, the frame rates range from 310 FPS at Ultra to 384 FPS at Low. This 74 FPS spread suggests that the Ryzen 5 3600 can push frame rates beyond the 300 FPS mark but cannot reach the heights that a newer, higher-clocked processor might achieve. The 12 threads provide adequate parallelism for the game's AI-driven enemy behavior and squad dynamics, but the Zen 2 architecture's single-thread performance, as shown by the PassMark single-thread score of 2562, may limit maximum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1440p, the CPU and GPU share the workload more evenly, with frame rates between 199 FPS at Ultra and 329 FPS at Low. The 4K results, where the GPU dominates, show a narrower relative gap between presets, ranging from 104 FPS at Ultra to 187 FPS at Low. This pattern indicates that the RTX 5090 D becomes the primary performance driver at higher resolutions, while the Ryzen 5 3600 remains sufficient for maintaining playable frame rates throughout the tested configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D ranks 167th out of 2947 tested combinations in Ready Or Not, placing it in the top 5.7% of all systems evaluated by the database. This ranking is particularly noteworthy given the age of the CPU, which was released in 2019 with a launch MSRP of $199, paired with a GPU released in 2025 with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD.

The ranking reflects the RTX 5090 D's dominant performance characteristics. The GPU's benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 14326, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 376915, and a PassMark G3D score of 44065. These figures place the GPU in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77712. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT with a score of 78940 and a delta of -1.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT at 76904 with a delta of 1.1%.

The CPU's 71st percentile ranking, while respectable, shows that the processor is not a top-tier contender. However, in Ready Or Not, the combination's rank of 167 out of 2947 demonstrates that the GPU can compensate for the CPU's limitations, particularly at higher resolutions where the graphics card does most of the heavy lifting. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation, with 4K High achieving 148 FPS and 4K Medium reaching 163 FPS, both excellent results for a demanding tactical shooter.

The ranking also indicates that this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems tested in this game. With 2780 combinations ranked below it, the Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 5090 D setup delivers performance that would satisfy even the most demanding players, especially those using high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p or 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals distinct scaling patterns as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 354 at 1080p to 284 at 1440p, a 70 FPS decrease, and then to 148 at 4K, another 136 FPS decrease. This represents a 58.2% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions.

For the Low preset, the scaling shows a similar trend: 384 FPS at 1080p, 329 FPS at 1440p (55 FPS drop), and 187 FPS at 4K (142 FPS drop). The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 51.3%, slightly less severe than High settings. This suggests that even at Low settings, the RTX 5090 D's workload scales significantly with resolution, while the CPU maintains relatively consistent frame delivery.

The Medium preset, which has the most complete data, shows a different pattern. At 1080p Medium, the average is 366 FPS. At 1440p, it drops to 312 FPS, a 54 FPS decrease. At 4K, it falls to 163 FPS, a 149 FPS decrease from 1440p. The minimum FPS values follow a similar trajectory: 311 at 1080p, 265 at 1440p, and 139 at 4K. The maximum values are 421 at 1080p, 359 at 1440p, and 187 at 4K.

The Ultra preset shows the steepest relative decline: 310 FPS at 1080p, 199 FPS at 1440p (111 FPS drop), and 104 FPS at 4K (95 FPS drop). The 66.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K indicates that Ultra settings place a heavy load on the GPU, particularly at 4K where the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are taxed by the game's high-resolution textures and effects.

These scaling patterns suggest that at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 3600's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to feed the RTX 5090 D, resulting in frame rates that approach the GPU's maximum output. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck, with the CPU's role diminishing. The result is a system that performs admirably across all resolutions, with the greatest relative performance available at 1440p, where the 284 FPS at High settings provides an excellent balance of speed and visual quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all presets. The Low preset produces an average of 384 FPS, the highest measured result in the entire dataset. High settings achieve 354 FPS, while Medium averages 366 FPS with a minimum of 311 FPS and a maximum of 421 FPS. The Ultra preset, despite being the most demanding, still maintains an average of 310 FPS. These results indicate that at 1080p, the combination of the Ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 5090 D provides frame rates far beyond what any current monitor can display, making this resolution suitable for competitive play where every millisecond counts.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high. Low settings average 329 FPS, High settings reach 284 FPS, and Medium averages 312 FPS with a minimum of 265 FPS and a maximum of 359 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 199 FPS, which is still well above the 144Hz refresh rate common on high-end gaming monitors. The 1440p results show a more balanced distribution between CPU and GPU load, with the RTX 5090 D beginning to assert its dominance while the Ryzen 5 3600 continues to provide adequate support.

At 3840x2160, the system demonstrates its 4K capabilities. The Low preset averages 187 FPS, which is remarkable for a 4K resolution. Medium settings achieve 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 187 FPS, providing a smooth experience even during intense firefights. High settings maintain 148 FPS, while Ultra falls to 104 FPS. These 4K results confirm that the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 512-bit memory bus are well-suited for high-resolution gaming, and that the Ryzen 5 3600 does not significantly hamper performance at this resolution.

The complete dataset shows that the system's performance ranges from a low of 104 FPS at 4K Ultra to a high of 384 FPS at 1080p Low. The Medium preset provides the most comprehensive measurements, with minimum and maximum values recorded for all three resolutions. These figures reveal that the system maintains frame rates above 100 FPS even under the most demanding conditions, making it a capable platform for Ready Or Not regardless of the player's preferred resolution or visual settings.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4200 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

VRAM 32 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2407 MHz MHz
TDP 575 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 187.0
3840x2160 Medium 163.0
3840x2160 High 148.0
3840x2160 Ultra 104.0
2560x1440 Low 329.0
2560x1440 Medium 312.0
2560x1440 High 284.0
2560x1440 Ultra 199.0
1920x1080 Low 384.0
1920x1080 Medium 366.0
1920x1080 High 354.0
1920x1080 Ultra 310.0

Ready Or Not with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with RTX 5090 D + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 5090 D

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.