Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
160
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 160 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 58 86 121
1440p QHD 109 117 162 229
1080p Full HD 177 183 258 363

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 121
3840x2160 Medium 86
3840x2160 Ultra 59
3840x2160 High 58
2560x1440 Low 229
2560x1440 Medium 162
2560x1440 High 117
2560x1440 Ultra 109
1920x1080 Low 363
1920x1080 Medium 258
1920x1080 High 183
1920x1080 Ultra 177

Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis

# Pc Building Simulator — Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

The data for Pc Building Simulator shows a profound sensitivity to settings and resolution that reveals a GPU-bound title at high quality presets, yet one that scales to extraordinary frame rates at lower settings. With the Intel Core i7-14700KF paired against the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, the measured results span from a cinematic 58 FPS at 4K High to a staggering 363.3 FPS at 1080p Low — a range that suggests the simulation's workload shifts dramatically based on configuration. This combination ranks 449th out of 1769 tested combos, placing it comfortably in the top quartile of all pairings, though the GPU's 82nd percentile versus all GPUs hints that the bottleneck profile changes more than raw scores might suggest.

Resolution Scaling

Moving from 1080p to 4K produces a steep and consistent frame rate collapse across all settings, but the magnitude of the drop tells a clear story about where the limiting component resides. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 183.2 at 1080p to 116.8 at 1440p (a 36.3% reduction) and then to 58 at 4K (a 68.3% reduction from 1080p). This pattern — where each resolution step approximately halves the frame rate — is the classic signature of a GPU-limited scenario, as the rendering resolution directly scales the pixel workload that the RX 9070 XT must process.

The Low preset reveals an even more dramatic scaling curve. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 363.3 FPS, dropping to 229.2 at 1440p and 120.6 at 4K. The 4K figure still represents a highly playable experience, but the fact that it drops by roughly two-thirds from the 1080p number suggests the CPU begins to matter more at lower settings, where the GPU is no longer the sole constraint. Medium settings follow the same trajectory: 258.1 FPS at 1080p, 162.3 at 1440p, and 85.7 at 4K — a consistent halving at each step that reinforces the GPU's dominant role.

Ultra settings show the tightest scaling, with 177 FPS at 1080p, 108.8 at 1440p, and 58.5 at 4K. The near-identical 4K results between High (58) and Ultra (58.5) are particularly telling — at this resolution, the RX 9070 XT's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth appear to hit a performance ceiling that additional quality settings cannot overcome. The data implies that 4K gaming with this combo will always hover near the 60 FPS mark, regardless of whether the player chooses High or Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows suggest that Medium settings offer the most balanced experience across all three resolutions, delivering frame rates that far exceed display refresh rate capabilities. At 1080p Medium, the combo produces 258.1 FPS — enough headroom for even the fastest high-refresh monitors. At 1440p Medium, 162.3 FPS remains exceptionally fluid, while 4K Medium at 85.7 FPS provides a smooth experience that avoids the sub-60 territory of High and Ultra.

High settings present a more nuanced picture. At 1080p, 183.2 FPS is still excellent, and 1440p High at 116.8 FPS remains highly responsive. However, 4K High drops to 58 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider the minimum for smooth gameplay. Ultra settings at 4K produce 58.5 FPS — essentially identical to High — meaning the extra visual fidelity comes at no additional frame rate cost, but also that neither preset achieves a locked 60.

For players targeting 4K, the data suggests Medium is the sweet spot: 85.7 FPS represents a 47.8% improvement over Ultra's 58.5 FPS while presumably retaining most of the visual quality. At 1440p and below, Ultra remains viable with 108.8 and 177 FPS respectively, making it the recommended choice for those with high-refresh displays who prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rates.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF brings substantial processing power to this pairing, with 20 cores and 28 threads running at a 3.40 GHz base clock and 5.60 GHz boost. Its benchmark results are impressive: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,557 and a single-core score of 6,290, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 further bolster its capability for simulation workloads.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role appears secondary but not negligible. The evidence lies in the scaling at Low settings — at 1080p Low, the combo reaches 363.3 FPS, a figure that would be difficult to achieve if the CPU were a bottleneck. However, the fact that 4K Low (120.6 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (177 FPS) differ so dramatically suggests that while the GPU handles the bulk of the rendering load, the i7-14700KF's high single-thread performance ensures it never becomes the limiting factor in this title.

The CPU's nearest rival data shows it performing within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-14700K and 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, indicating that this processor sits at the top tier of gaming performance. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 52,425 and single-thread score of 4,480 reinforce that it can feed even the fastest GPU configurations without creating a bottleneck in a simulation game like this.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT configuration ranks 449th out of 1,769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 74.6th percentile of all pairings. This is a strong result, though the GPU's 82nd percentile ranking versus all GPUs suggests that the overall combo rank is dragged down slightly by other factors — possibly the CPU's 96th percentile position creating an imbalance where the processor outperforms the graphics card.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT's average benchmark score of 39,647 is within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon Pro 575 (39,703) and 0.2% of the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568). This clustering indicates that in raw compute terms, the RX 9070 XT performs in a specific bandwidth, though its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7,260 and PassMark G3D score of 26,795 demonstrate its gaming-focused architecture.

The combo's rank suggests that for a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which may not fully utilize the GPU's ray tracing capabilities (64 RT cores) or its 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, the combination still delivers top-tier performance. The 4K Low result of 120.6 FPS puts this combo in the upper echelon of 4K-capable systems, even if the High preset drops to exactly 58 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the clear primary driver of frame rates in this title, and its specifications explain the measured results. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, the GPU has ample resources for high-resolution textures. Its 2,970 MHz boost clock and 2,400 MHz game clock ensure high throughput, while the 4,096 shading units and 128 ROPs handle pixel processing efficiently.

The GPU's benchmark scores reveal its strengths: a PassMark G3D score of 26,795 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 184,026. Its 82nd percentile ranking places it above most GPUs, though its nearest rivals include workstation-oriented cards like the AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile, which suggests that in some compute workloads, the RX 9070 XT doesn't dramatically outperform professional parts.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role is most evident in the resolution scaling data. The jump from 1440p Low (229.2 FPS) to 4K Low (120.6 FPS) represents a 47.4% performance drop, while the transition from 1080p High (183.2 FPS) to 4K High (58 FPS) shows a 68.3% reduction. These figures indicate that the RX 9070 XT is operating near its limits at 4K High, with the 16 GB VRAM and memory bandwidth becoming the limiting factors rather than raw compute power.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all settings. Low produces 363.3 FPS, Medium reaches 258.1 FPS, High achieves 183.2 FPS, and Ultra manages 177 FPS. The relatively small gap between High and Ultra (6.2 FPS) suggests diminishing returns from the highest quality settings at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the results remain highly playable. Low delivers 229.2 FPS, Medium hits 162.3 FPS, High reaches 116.8 FPS, and Ultra drops to 108.8 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction of roughly 36-38% across all settings, confirming the GPU-bound nature of the workload.

At 3840x2160, performance becomes more constrained. Low still manages 120.6 FPS, Medium produces 85.7 FPS, High drops to 58 FPS, and Ultra matches at 58.5 FPS. The near-identical High and Ultra results at 4K indicate that the GPU has reached its practical limit, with the 16 GB VRAM buffer and memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s unable to differentiate between these two quality presets.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS?

A: All three tested resolutions can exceed 60 FPS, but 4K only achieves this at Low (120.6 FPS) and Medium (85.7 FPS). At 4K High and Ultra, the average FPS falls to 58 and 58.5 respectively, just below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF's average benchmark score of 70,104 is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-14700K (70,074) and 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (70,420). It outperforms the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,056) by 1.3%.

Q: Does the GPU perform better in DirectX or Vulkan benchmarks?

A: The RX 9070 XT scores 184,026 in Geekbench Vulkan and 160,317 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 7,260, while PassMark DirectX 12 achieves 78 and DirectX 11 reaches 292.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, High produces 183.2 FPS while Ultra achieves 177 FPS — a difference of 6.2 FPS, representing a 3.4% reduction for the highest quality preset.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 2,518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective).

Q: Where does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This combination ranks 449th out of 1,769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top 25% of all pairings tested for this game.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700KF

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2970 MHz MHz
TDP 304 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 120.6
3840x2160 Medium 85.7
3840x2160 Ultra 58.5
3840x2160 High 58.0
2560x1440 Low 229.2
2560x1440 Medium 162.3
2560x1440 High 116.8
2560x1440 Ultra 108.8
1920x1080 Low 363.3
1920x1080 Medium 258.1
1920x1080 High 183.2
1920x1080 Ultra 177.0

Pc Building Simulator with ii7-14700KF + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700KF + RX 9070 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.