Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
186
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 186 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 69 73 101 139
1440p QHD 130 132 192 269
1080p Full HD 203 214 303 406

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 139
3840x2160 Medium 101
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Ultra 69
2560x1440 Low 269
2560x1440 Medium 192
2560x1440 High 132
2560x1440 Ultra 130
1920x1080 Low 406
1920x1080 Medium 303
1920x1080 High 214
1920x1080 Ultra 203

Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis

# Pc Building Simulator — Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX delivers exceptional performance in Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title that scales aggressively across resolutions and settings. The processor, part of the Alder Lake-S generation built on Intel's 10 nm process, offers 12 cores and 20 threads with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The GPU, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, provides 24 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 384-bit bus. This combination achieves a combo rank of 203 out of 1769 tested configurations, placing it in the top 11.5% of all pairings tested in this game. The data reveals a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at higher resolutions but shows signs of CPU constraint at 1080p with low settings, where frame rates exceed 400 FPS.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700K's 12 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 25 MB shared L3 cache, provide the computational foundation for Pc Building Simulator's simulation logic. The processor's architecture uses an 80 KB L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, which helps with the game's asset management and physics calculations typical of simulation titles. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a 3DMark 16-thread score of 9276 and a max-thread score of 9979, indicating strong multi-threaded scaling. Single-thread performance is equally robust, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4128, which matters for games that rely on a primary render thread.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 89 among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 35684, places it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, which scores 35802 (a 0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35468 (0.6% delta). The i7-12700K sits between these in performance, with the Intel Core i5-14500HX trailing by 0.7% and the Intel Core i7-13800H leading by 0.8%. These narrow deltas show that the CPU's performance is consistent with its generation peers, though the gap to newer parts remains small.

In the context of Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role becomes evident when examining frame rates at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 406.1 FPS average, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far beyond typical display refresh rates. However, the game's simulation nature means that CPU overhead for object management, component interaction logic, and the assembly interface can become a bottleneck in complex scenes. The processor's 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier indicate headroom for enthusiasts, though the benchmark data shows stock configuration performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700K compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35684, placing it 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802) and 0.6% above the Intel Core i7-13700T (35468). It also trails the Intel Core i5-14500HX by 0.7% and leads the Intel Core i7-13800H by 0.8%.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark ranking compared to other graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has a percentile ranking of 85 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44019. It sits 0.8% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (43667) and 2% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (44900).

Q: What frame rates does this combo achieve at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system averages 68.5 FPS. Dropping to High settings at the same resolution yields 72.5 FPS, while Medium produces 100.5 FPS and Low reaches 139.4 FPS.

Q: How does performance scale from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 214.1 FPS at 1920x1080 to 132.2 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 72.5 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 66.1% reduction from 1080p to 4K.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested configurations?

A: This CPU-GPU pairing ranks 203rd out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top 11.5% of all configurations tested.

Q: Does the system show signs of CPU limitation at any tested settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system reaches 406.1 FPS, which is nearly double the High setting result of 214.1 FPS at the same resolution. This wide gap suggests that at lower settings and resolutions, the CPU's ability to process game logic becomes the limiting factor rather than GPU rendering.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling across resolutions, with the most dramatic drops occurring between 1080p and 1440p. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 406.1 at 1920x1080 to 268.7 at 2560x1440, a 33.8% reduction, then to 139.4 at 3840x2160, a further 48.1% drop. This indicates that at Low settings, the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution increases, while the CPU's contribution remains relatively constant.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is more moderate in relative terms but still substantial. The system delivers 202.8 FPS at 1080p, 130.3 FPS at 1440p, and 68.5 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is just 33.8% of the 1080p figure, showing that the RX 7900 XTX's 24 GB memory buffer and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are heavily taxed at 4K with maximum visual fidelity. The gap between High and Ultra settings at each resolution is modest — at 4K, the difference is only 4 FPS (72.5 vs 68.5), suggesting that Ultra settings impose minimal additional cost over High for this GPU.

The scaling pattern across all settings at 4K is particularly informative. Low settings produce 139.4 FPS, Medium 100.5 FPS, High 72.5 FPS, and Ultra 68.5 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 38.9 FPS, while the step from Medium to High costs 28 FPS, and High to Ultra costs just 4 FPS. This diminishing return curve indicates that the GPU's compute resources — 6144 shading units and 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 performance — are the limiting factor at 4K, with the CPU providing ample headroom at all settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080 resolution, the system demonstrates exceptional performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 406.1 FPS, Medium settings reach 302.9 FPS, High settings deliver 214.1 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 202.8 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 50.1% reduction in frame rate, with the largest single drop occurring between Low and Medium (103.2 FPS). The relatively small gap between High and Ultra (11.3 FPS) suggests that the highest settings tier does not impose a significant additional load at this resolution, likely due to the CPU becoming a more prominent factor at extremely high frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the system still delivers excellent performance. Low settings average 268.7 FPS, Medium settings 191.9 FPS, High settings 132.2 FPS, and Ultra settings 130.3 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra narrows to just 1.9 FPS, indicating that at 1440p, the GPU's shading workload for Ultra effects is nearly identical to High. The step-down from Low to Medium costs 76.8 FPS, while Medium to High costs 59.7 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system remains playable even at maximum settings. Ultra averages 68.5 FPS, High 72.5 FPS, Medium 100.5 FPS, and Low 139.4 FPS. The 4K results show the most consistent scaling, with each settings tier producing a meaningful frame rate change. The difference between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings is a 66.2% reduction (202.8 to 68.5 FPS), while at Low settings the reduction is 65.7% (406.1 to 139.4 FPS). This consistency across settings tiers at 4K confirms that resolution, rather than settings, is the dominant factor determining performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination achieves a rank of 203 out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it comfortably in the top 11.5% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the strong synergy between the CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4128) and the GPU's substantial compute capabilities (61.39 TFLOPS FP32). The combo's performance is particularly notable at 4K, where the RX 7900 XTX's 24 GB memory capacity and 384-bit bus provide ample bandwidth for the game's asset streaming.

Relative to other tested configurations, this combo sits above the 85th percentile of GPUs and the 89th percentile of CPUs individually. The combination of two high-percentile parts yields a combined ranking that exceeds either component's individual percentile, indicating that Pc Building Simulator benefits from both strong CPU simulation logic and powerful GPU rendering. The rank of 203 means that 1566 tested combos perform worse, while only 202 achieve better results, placing this system in the upper echelon of gaming configurations for this title.

The data shows that the system's performance ceiling is primarily set by the GPU at 4K, where even at Low settings the frame rate drops to 139.4 FPS, well below the 406.1 FPS achievable at 1080p Low. At 1080p and 1440p, the system delivers frame rates that exceed typical high-refresh-rate monitor capabilities (144-240 Hz) at High settings and above, making this combo well-suited for competitive or high-fidelity play. The benchmark results indicate that for users prioritizing maximum visual quality at 4K, this configuration meets the 60 FPS threshold at Ultra settings with a 68.5 FPS average, providing a solid foundation for the game's simulation-heavy gameplay.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700K

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2498 MHz MHz
TDP 355 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 139.4
3840x2160 Medium 100.5
3840x2160 High 72.5
3840x2160 Ultra 68.5
2560x1440 Low 268.7
2560x1440 Medium 191.9
2560x1440 High 132.2
2560x1440 Ultra 130.3
1920x1080 Low 406.1
1920x1080 Medium 302.9
1920x1080 High 214.1
1920x1080 Ultra 202.8

Pc Building Simulator with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700K + RX 7900 XTX

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.