Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, presents an interesting workload that scales dramatically with both resolution and graphics settings. The measured data for the Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti shows a configuration that is clearly GPU-limited at higher resolutions but demonstrates the substantial headroom of the CPU at lower settings. The frame rates achieved across the board indicate that this combination is exceptionally well-balanced for this particular title, offering high performance without any single component becoming a bottleneck until the most demanding configurations are applied.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data reveals a significant and predictable drop in performance as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the "High" preset, the average FPS falls from 136.4 at 1080p to 85.9 at 1440p, and finally to 43.6 at 4K. This represents a considerable reduction in performance, with the 4K figure being less than one-third of the 1080p performance. Such a steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario; the RTX 3060 Ti is working progressively harder to render the increased pixel count, which directly translates to lower frame rates.

The scaling pattern at other settings reinforces this conclusion. At the "Low" preset, the average FPS at 1080p is an extremely high 276.2, which drops to 174.6 at 1440p and 94.1 at 4K. Even at the lowest visual quality, the 4K resolution still demands a significant amount of graphical processing power, resulting in a 65.9% reduction in FPS compared to 1080p. This indicates that even when the graphical load is minimized, the sheer number of pixels at 4K is enough to challenge the GPU.

The "Medium" and "Ultra" presets follow the same trajectory, with the gap between 1080p and 4K performance being substantial in all cases. The data suggests that the limiting component at higher resolutions is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, appears to have ample processing power to feed the GPU at 1080p, but as the resolution climbs, the GPU's rendering workload becomes the primary constraint on frame rate. This is a classic sign of a well-matched system where the GPU is the performance ceiling for demanding resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the central component driving the frame rates in Pc Building Simulator. Its performance characteristics, defined by its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, provide a 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. This bandwidth is crucial for handling the texture and geometry data at higher resolutions. The data shows that at 4K with "Ultra" settings, the average FPS is 42.5, which is the lowest measured value in the dataset. This is a direct consequence of the GPU being fully saturated by the game's rendering demands.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 1410 MHz and a boost of 1665 MHz, alongside its 4864 shading units, define its raw compute power. The benchmark scores for this GPU place it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25120. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3060 Ti is virtually identical in performance, with a deltaPct of -0.2 against the AMD Radeon RX 6700M and -0.5 against the AMD Radeon RX 6600. This indicates a very competitive performance level.

The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is a significant factor. While it is not directly measured in the FPS data, the substantial drop in performance from 1080p to 4K at the "High" preset (from 136.4 to 43.6 FPS) suggests that the GPU's memory subsystem and processing cores are working at their limits. The data indicates that the GPU is the dominant factor in determining performance at 1440p and 4K, as the CPU is likely not the limiting factor at those resolutions. The GPU's role is to render the complex 3D scenes, and its performance is clearly the bottleneck when pixel count and graphical fidelity are maximized.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i3-12100F, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, plays a supporting role in this configuration. Its performance in synthetic benchmarks is strong for its class; it scores 11912 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1681 in single-core. More importantly, its 3DMark scores show a pattern where single-threaded performance is a standout, with a score of 893 in the single-thread test compared to 4051 in the 16-thread test. This indicates that the CPU has robust single-core performance, which is often more critical for simulation games.

The CPU's benchmark data places it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13516. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, has an average score of 13534, a deltaPct of -0.1, showing the i3-12100F is nearly identical in average performance. This is a remarkable result for a 4-core part, demonstrating the efficiency of its Alder Lake architecture.

The CPU's role in Pc Building Simulator is best understood by examining the FPS data at 1080p. At this resolution, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with 276.2 FPS at "Low" and 136.4 FPS at "High" settings. These high numbers suggest that the CPU is capable of processing the game's simulation logic and draw calls far faster than the GPU can render them. The CPU is not the bottleneck at 1080p; instead, the GPU is. This is further evidenced by the fact that the FPS scales significantly with resolution, which would not happen if the CPU were the primary constraint. The CPU provides sufficient throughput to keep the GPU well-fed, even at high frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this specific pairing of the Core i3-12100F and RTX 3060 Ti holds a rank of 917 out of 1769 tested combos. This places it in the middle of the pack, which is a logical position given its component choices. The combination is not at the top of the charts, as there are likely many configurations with more powerful CPUs and GPUs that achieve higher average frame rates.

However, the rank is not a measure of poor performance. It is a relative position against a wide array of hardware. The fact that this combo ranks in the 52nd percentile (917/1769) suggests that it provides a solid, above-average experience for most users. The performance data shows it is capable of very high frame rates at 1080p, with Ultra settings delivering 129.5 FPS, which is an excellent result. At 1440p, it can still push past 60 FPS on "High" settings, with an average of 85.9 FPS.

The ranking reflects the overall balance of the system. It is not a top-tier enthusiast build, nor is it a low-end entry-level setup. It sits comfortably in the mid-range, offering a strong performance profile that will satisfy the majority of players. The data suggests that this combo is more than capable of providing a smooth and responsive experience in Pc Building Simulator at mainstream resolutions, and its mid-pack ranking reflects its balanced nature.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this configuration depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For players with a 1080p monitor, the "Ultra" preset is a viable choice, as it delivers an average FPS of 129.5, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. Even the "High" preset at 136.4 FPS offers a marginal gain in performance with a slight reduction in visual fidelity, but "Ultra" is recommended for the best visual experience without sacrificing playability.

At 1440p, the "High" preset is the recommended starting point, providing an average of 85.9 FPS. This is a significant jump from the "Ultra" preset's 81.2 FPS and offers a smoother experience, though the visual differences between the two presets may be subtle. The "Medium" preset at 125.8 FPS is an option for those seeking very high refresh rates, but "High" offers a better balance between image quality and performance for most users.

For 4K gaming, the situation is more constrained. The "Low" preset is the only setting that provides a firmly playable frame rate, with an average of 94.1 FPS. The "Medium" preset, at 66.9 FPS, is also playable but may feel less fluid in fast-paced scenes. The "High" and "Ultra" presets, at 43.6 and 42.5 FPS respectively, are not recommended for a consistently smooth experience, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold. Therefore, for 4K, the "Low" or "Medium" presets are the only reasonable choices to maintain a high frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The highest average FPS is 276.2, which was recorded at 1920x1080 resolution with "Low" settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At 4K with "Low" settings, the average FPS is 94.1, and with "Medium" settings it is 66.9. Using "High" or "Ultra" settings at 4K results in average FPS below 60, at 43.6 and 42.5 respectively.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested configurations in this game?

A: This combination of the Intel Core i3-12100F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ranks 917th out of 1769 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the performance spectrum.

Q: What is the performance difference between the "High" and "Ultra" presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 resolution, the "High" preset achieves an average FPS of 85.9, while the "Ultra" preset achieves 81.2 FPS. This is a difference of 4.7 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. The frame rates are extremely high (136.4 FPS at "High"), and they scale down significantly as resolution increases, which is a sign of a GPU bottleneck rather than a CPU bottleneck.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the CPU and GPU in this combo?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13516, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 25120.