Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 145 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 55 | 75 | 111 |
| 1440p QHD | 101 | 103 | 145 | 207 |
| 1080p Full HD | 159 | 164 | 236 | 329 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The data for Pc Building Simulator with the Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution, but with notable shifts in performance depending on the graphics preset. This combination, ranking 632nd out of 1769 tested combos, places it in the upper-middle tier of the database, indicating a balanced pairing that is more capable at lower resolutions than at 4K. The benchmark results, all measured, provide a clear picture of where the bottlenecks lie.
Resolution Scaling
The measured frames per second (FPS) show a substantial drop as resolution increases, which is typical for a system where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher pixel counts. At 1080p with High settings, the combo delivers an average of 164.2 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same High preset, the average falls to 103 FPS, a reduction of approximately 37%. The leap to 4K (3840x2160) at High settings further reduces the average to 54.9 FPS, which is a 47% drop from the 1440p figure and a 67% drop from the 1080p result. This steep decline indicates that the Radeon RX 7800 XT is being progressively saturated as the pixel count increases.
The scaling pattern across all presets reinforces this analysis. At Low settings, the system achieves 328.6 FPS at 1080p, 206.9 FPS at 1440p, and 110.9 FPS at 4K. The relative drops are consistent: 37% from 1080p to 1440p, and another 46% from 1440p to 4K. This linear degradation suggests that the GPU’s rendering workload is scaling directly with resolution, and that the CPU is not introducing a significant bottleneck at any of these settings. The data points to the GPU as the dominant constraint at 4K, as the frame rate nearly halves with each resolution step, a trend that would be less pronounced if the processor were the limiting component.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. In the context of Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title that typically does not demand extreme multi-threaded performance, this configuration appears sufficient to keep the GPU fed at lower resolutions. The benchmark scores for the CPU support this notion; for instance, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 11912, and the single-core score is 1681, indicating solid per-thread performance that is often more critical for game logic than raw core counts.
When comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals in the database, the data shows it is closely matched with far more expensive processors. The i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13516, which is just 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (avgScore 13534) and 0.4% above the Intel Core i7-1250U (avgScore 13462). It also edges out the Intel Core i7-7700K by 1.8% (avgScore 13280). This suggests that the i3-12100F’s performance in this game is not a limiting factor; its single-threaded strength is adequate to drive the RX 7800 XT to high frame rates at 1080p, where the system reaches 328.6 FPS on Low settings. The CPU’s 72nd percentile ranking among all tested processors further indicates that it is a capable partner for this GPU, even if its 4-core design is modest by modern standards.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of performance across presets, allowing for precise recommendations based on the target resolution. At 1080p, all presets deliver playable frame rates, but the choice between them depends on whether the user prioritizes visual fidelity or maximum smoothness. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields an average of 158.8 FPS, which is only 3% lower than the High preset’s 164.2 FPS. Given this minimal gap, the High preset is the more sensible choice for 1080p gaming, as it offers nearly identical performance with likely better visual quality than Medium (235.7 FPS) without sacrificing the smoothness that high-refresh-rate displays demand.
At 1440p, the High preset delivers 103 FPS, which is a solid result for most monitors, while the Ultra preset drops to 100.5 FPS, a negligible 2.4% difference. The Medium preset at 145.2 FPS is also viable, but the step up to High is worth the modest frame rate cost for better visuals. The Low preset at 206.9 FPS is unnecessary unless the user is chasing extremely high refresh rates. For 4K, the situation changes; the High preset produces 54.9 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay, and the Ultra preset is nearly identical at 54.8 FPS. The Medium preset at 75.2 FPS is the best balance for 4K, offering a significant 37% improvement over High while still providing acceptable visual quality. The Low preset at 110.9 FPS is the only way to achieve a high frame rate at this resolution, but it comes with a substantial visual compromise. Based on the data, the High preset is the recommended default for 1080p and 1440p, while Medium is the pragmatic choice for 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 632 out of 1769 tested combinations places it in the 64th percentile of all systems in the database for Pc Building Simulator. This is a strong showing, indicating that the pairing outperforms a majority of other tested configurations. The ranking is particularly noteworthy given the CPU’s modest 4-core design; it demonstrates that a capable GPU can compensate for a less powerful processor in this specific game. The GPU’s own percentile ranking of 76th among all graphics cards (avgBenchmarkScore 32619) is higher than the combo’s overall rank, suggesting that the CPU is slightly holding back the GPU’s full potential, but not by a significant margin.
The nearest rival CPUs, such as the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and the Intel Core i7-7700K, have average scores within 1.8% of the i3-12100F, which implies that the combo’s rank is not heavily influenced by processor choice. Similarly, the GPU’s nearest rivals, including the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 and the NVIDIA P104-100, have scores within 0.7% of the RX 7800 XT, showing that the graphics card is performing as expected. The combination of a high-percentile GPU with a mid-tier CPU results in a system that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it sits in the middle of the pack for 4K, where the GPU’s limitations become more apparent.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is the primary driver of performance in this combo, and its specifications align with the observed scaling behavior. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This ample memory capacity and bandwidth are sufficient for the texture-heavy workloads of a simulation game, even at 4K resolution. The GPU’s boost clock of 2430 MHz and game clock of 2124 MHz contribute to its high throughput, with a pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s.
The GPU’s benchmark scores confirm its position in the market. Its Passmark G3D score of 24176 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4157 are indicative of strong rasterization performance. The GPU’s 76th percentile ranking among all GPUs underscores its capability, but the measured FPS at 4K shows that even this hardware cannot maintain high frame rates at Ultra settings, where it averages 54.8 FPS. The fact that the 4K Ultra result is nearly identical to the 4K High result (54.9 FPS) suggests that the GPU is reaching a performance ceiling that is not easily overcome by lowering quality settings from High to Ultra. The step to Medium at 4K, however, provides a meaningful boost to 75.2 FPS, indicating that the GPU has headroom when certain effects are reduced. Overall, the RX 7800 XT is a capable card for this game, but its performance at 4K is modest, and the data suggests that users targeting 4K should be prepared to use Medium settings to achieve a smooth experience.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 110.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 75.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 54.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 54.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 206.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 145.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 103.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 100.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 328.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 235.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 164.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 158.8 |
Pc Building Simulator with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RX 7800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 7800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.