Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title focused on the assembly and management of PC hardware, presents a unique workload that is less about raw graphical fidelity and more about system responsiveness and logical throughput. The measured data for the combination of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 reveals consistent performance across a range of presets and resolutions. The results indicate a system that is well-balanced, though the scaling patterns suggest that the CPU's substantial processing power plays a pivotal role in maintaining high frame rates, particularly at lower resolutions.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a discrete GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. Its core clocks are listed with a base of 1830 MHz and a boost of 2460 MHz. The GPU also includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, though these are not typically stressed by the simulation-focused rendering of Pc Building Simulator. The card's 48 ROPs and 96 TMUs contribute to a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role is primarily to handle the 3D viewport rendering and any visual effects. The measured frame rates show that the RTX 4060 is more than capable of handling the game's demands at high settings. At 1080p High settings, the system achieves an average of 119 FPS. Moving to 4K Ultra, the average dips to 37 FPS, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder at higher resolutions and graphical presets. The 8 GB VRAM allocation appears sufficient for this title, as no data suggests memory-related bottlenecks or stuttering. The GPU's performance, as measured by its average benchmark score of 17639, places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon 780M with a deltaPct of 0.3 and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with a deltaPct of 0.5, are extremely close in aggregate performance, yet the RTX 4060's dedicated memory and architecture provide a distinct advantage in a full system context. The data shows that the GPU's performance is the limiting factor at the highest settings, as the difference between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings is a drop from 113 FPS to 37 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

Within the database of tested hardware combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a rank of 1800 out of 3002 total combos. This places it in the lower half of the distribution, which is a crucial context for interpreting its absolute performance numbers. While the system delivers playable frame rates in most scenarios, its relative standing suggests that many other pairings achieve higher overall performance in this specific game.

The rank of 1800 out of 3002 combos indicates that while this configuration is not a top-tier performer, it is also not near the bottom. It occupies a solid mid-range position. This is consistent with the CPU and GPU's individual benchmark percentiles, which are 95th and 61st respectively. The high-performing CPU is paired with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that is capable but not extreme. The combination's rank suggests that in Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's moderate standing relative to other cards is a significant factor in the overall combo ranking, as the CPU is unlikely to be a limiting factor given its high percentile. The data implies that for users seeking higher rankings, a more powerful GPU would be the primary upgrade path, as the CPU has more headroom to support it. This rank is a direct measure of how this specific pairing compares to all other tested pairings in the database, providing a clear, quantifiable position for the system's overall capability in this game.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed "Strix Halo". It is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU features a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache and a quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface, yielding a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. Its 4 nm process node and 55 W TDP are notable for a processor of this capability. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 35314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2044 in single-core, reflecting strong multi-threaded and adequate single-threaded performance. Its average benchmark score of 77740 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i9-14900K, which has a deltaPct of -1.7.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU is likely the primary driver of game logic, component interactions, and system simulation. The high core count and thread count are advantageous for handling the numerous background calculations and AI routines that such a simulation requires. The importance of the CPU is evident in the frame rate scaling. At 1080p Low settings, the system produces an average of 237 FPS, which is a massive increase from the 119 FPS at 1080p High. This pattern suggests that at lower settings, where the GPU has less work, the CPU's performance is the key factor in achieving such high frame rates. The strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044, likely contributes to the game's responsiveness. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck even at 1080p, as frame rates scale dramatically with lower graphical settings, indicating that the GPU is the limiting component in that scenario.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the system's overall ranking for Pc Building Simulator performance?

A: This combination of an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1800th out of 3002 tested combinations for this game.

Q: What are the average frame rates at 1440p on Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 resolution with Medium settings, the system achieves an average of 106 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 77740. In comparison to the Intel Core i9-14900K, which has an average score of 79097, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% slower.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the system fail to maintain 60 FPS on average?

A: At 3840x2160 resolution, the system falls below 60 FPS on both High (39 FPS) and Medium (55 FPS) settings, and also at Ultra (37 FPS).

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between 1080p and 4K at Low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 237. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS drops to 78, a decrease of 159 FPS.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured frame rates across resolutions provide a clear picture of the system's scaling behavior. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 237 FPS at 1080p to 150 FPS at 1440p, and further to 78 FPS at 4K. This represents a 67% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. This significant drop indicates that even at Low settings, the GPU is being increasingly stressed as the pixel count rises. The CPU's immense processing power, ranked in the 95th percentile, is clearly capable of feeding the GPU frames at 1080p, but the GPU's 61st percentile standing becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

The scaling pattern at High settings is similarly revealing. The average frame rate falls from 119 FPS at 1080p to 75 FPS at 1440p, and then to 39 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is a 48% reduction, while the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 37%. This non-linear scaling is typical of a GPU-limited scenario, where the cost of rendering each pixel increases dramatically at higher resolutions. The fact that the frame rates do not double when moving from 4K to 1080p, even though the pixel count is four times lower, suggests that there is a CPU-side limit being approached at lower resolutions. However, the steep decline at 4K confirms that the RTX 4060's 8 GB memory and bandwidth are sufficient for the workload, but its raw compute power is the primary constraint on high-resolution performance. The data shows a system that is CPU-bound at lower resolutions and GPU-bound at higher ones, with the crossover point occurring somewhere between 1080p and 1440p depending on the preset.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data allows for a clear assessment of the optimal settings for a smooth and responsive experience in Pc Building Simulator. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 119 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset only provides a marginal increase in visual quality for a 6 FPS average loss (113 FPS), making High the more efficient choice for a 1080p display. The Medium preset offers a significant boost to 168 FPS, but the visual trade-off from High is likely more noticeable than the performance gain, given the game's focus on UI and text clarity.

At 2560x1440, the High preset provides an average of 75 FPS, which is still playable but not as fluid as 1080p. The Medium preset, with an average of 106 FPS, is a more comfortable option for 1440p users who prioritize frame rate. The Ultra preset drops to 71 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS but may exhibit occasional dips. For 4K resolution, no preset maintains a consistent 60 FPS average. The Low preset achieves 78 FPS, which is the only playable option, while Medium drops to 55 FPS and High to 39 FPS. The data suggests that for the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the High preset at 1080p and the Medium preset at 1440p are the recommended choices, as they provide the highest frame rates while still maintaining a level of graphical detail that is appropriate for the game's simulation-focused presentation.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following breakdown details the exact average frame rates measured for each resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 237 FPS on Low settings, 168 FPS on Medium, 119 FPS on High, and 113 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 1080p has a recorded minimum of 143 FPS and a maximum of 193 FPS. At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 150 FPS on Low, 106 FPS on Medium, 75 FPS on High, and 71 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p Medium preset shows a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates drop to 78 FPS on Low, 55 FPS on Medium, 39 FPS on High, and 37 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Medium preset has a minimum of 47 FPS and a maximum of 64 FPS. All other settings and resolution combinations do not have reported minimum or maximum values.

These numbers illustrate a clear performance hierarchy. The CPU's strength is most apparent at 1080p Low, where the frame rate exceeds 200 FPS. As settings and resolution increase, the GPU's workload grows, and the frame rates decline predictably. The data shows that the system is capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p with lower settings, and can maintain a solid 60+ FPS experience at 1440p with Medium or High settings. At 4K, the system is only viable with Low settings. The difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is a 41 FPS drop (78 to 37 FPS), highlighting the significant impact of the GPU's compute power on high-resolution performance.