Pc Building Simulator

This analysis examines the performance of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor paired with the AMD Radeon 760M integrated graphics in Pc Building Simulator. The data presented here is derived from measured FPS results and synthetic benchmark scores. This combination ranks near the very bottom of tested configurations for this title, indicating a significant performance bottleneck that will be explored in detail across the following sections.

FAQ

Q: How does this CPU+GPU combo rank in Pc Building Simulator?

A: This specific combination ranks 2992 out of 3002 tested combos, placing it in the bottom percentile of all configurations evaluated for this game.

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 77 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only setting tested that approaches high-refresh-rate playability.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the primary bottleneck for this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The Radeon 760M's benchmark percentile is 35, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's percentile is 95. The massive disparity in relative performance strongly suggests the integrated GPU is holding back the system.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, scores 76513, making the AI Max+ 395 just 1.6% faster in average synthetic benchmarks.

Q: How does the GPU's raw compute power compare to its closest competitor?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6400, scores 6001, meaning the 760M is a mere 0.3% faster on average. This shows it is positioned at a very specific performance tier.

Q: Does the game scale well with resolution changes?

A: Yes, but the scaling is steep. Dropping from 2560x1440 to 1920x1080 at Low settings increases the average FPS from 48 to 77, a significant jump that highlights how resolution heavily impacts the integrated GPU's workload.

How This Combo Ranks

The performance ranking for this system in Pc Building Simulator is stark. With a rank of 2992 out of 3002 tested combos, this configuration sits in the bottom 0.3% of all tested hardware pairings. This is a definitive statement about its capabilities in this specific simulation title; it is not a mid-range or entry-level performer, but one of the slowest systems in the entire database for this game.

This ranking is a direct consequence of the pairing. The CPU, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, is a high-end mobile processor with a 16-core, 32-thread configuration. Its synthetic benchmark scores are impressive. For instance, it scores 35314 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 20992 in Geekbench multicore. Its 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position as a top-tier processor. However, the GPU is a different story. The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics solution with a 35th percentile ranking among all GPUs. While it is a capable iGPU for light tasks, its raw graphics throughput is limited.

The combination of a top-5% CPU with a bottom-35% GPU creates a massive imbalance. In a game like Pc Building Simulator, which has modest graphical demands but can be sensitive to system performance, the weak link is clearly the GPU. The CPU's considerable power is largely left untapped because the iGPU cannot render frames fast enough to utilize it. The rank of 2992 reflects this bottleneck, showing that while the processor is a powerhouse, the overall system is hamstrung by its graphics component, resulting in one of the lowest possible performance outcomes for the game.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. This scaling is a critical indicator of where the system's limits lie. The most instructive comparison is at Low settings, where the GPU is least stressed. At 3840x2160 (4K), the average FPS is 25. Dropping to 2560x1440 (1440p) raises the average to 48 FPS, a 92% improvement. Moving down again to 1920x1080 (1080p) results in an average of 77 FPS, a further 60% improvement over the 1440p result. This steep curve demonstrates that the Radeon 760M is heavily dependent on resolution to maintain playable frame rates.

This scaling pattern is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU is more than capable of handling the game's simulation logic at any of these resolutions, but the integrated GPU's fill rate and shading power are quickly overwhelmed as the pixel count increases. The difference between 1080p and 4K at Low settings is a 52 FPS drop, which is a 208% reduction in performance. This is a far more significant drop than would be expected if the CPU were the limiting factor, as CPU load does not scale linearly with resolution in the same way.

The data suggests that for a smooth experience, 1080p is the practical limit for this combo. The 1440p results, while playable at Low settings, show a significant performance hit. The 4K results are uniformly poor across all settings, with the highest average being just 25 FPS at Low. The conclusion is clear: the Radeon 760M's memory bandwidth and compute resources are simply insufficient for high-resolution rendering in this game, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck in the resolution scaling equation.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the results range from playable to smooth. With Low settings, the system achieves an average of 77 FPS, which is the only configuration in the entire dataset that reaches a level suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 and a maximum of 62 FPS, providing a stable, playable experience for most users. High settings yield 38 FPS, and Ultra settings drop further to 36 FPS, both of which are on the edge of smoothness and may feel sluggish in a simulation game.

At 2560x1440, the performance takes a significant hit. Low settings produce an average of 48 FPS, which is playable but noticeably less smooth than the 1080p result. Medium settings average 34 FPS, with a range of 29 to 39 FPS. This is borderline playable, but frame pacing may be an issue. High settings drop to 24 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 23 FPS, both of which are too low for a comfortable gaming experience. The step from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings represents a 60% reduction in frame rate, highlighting the GPU's struggle with the increased pixel load.

The 3840x2160 results are uniformly poor and confirm that 4K is not a viable option for this hardware. Low settings manage an average of 25 FPS, which is technically playable but far from ideal. Medium settings average 18 FPS, with a minimum of 15 and a maximum of 21 FPS, creating a stuttering experience. High settings drop to 13 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 12 FPS. These numbers are essentially a slideshow and demonstrate that the Radeon 760M lacks the computational power and memory bandwidth to handle 4K rendering in this game. The data clearly shows that the only resolution that offers a consistently smooth experience is 1920x1080, and only at Low or Medium settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 760M is the decisive factor in this system's gaming performance. This integrated GPU, based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, is built on a 4 nm process and features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores. Its boost clock is rated at 2599 MHz, and it can deliver a peak FP32 throughput of 5.323 TFLOPS. These specifications, while respectable for an integrated solution, are fundamentally limited.

The GPU's memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the main system memory rather than dedicated VRAM. Its bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which ties its performance directly to the CPU's memory controller and the speed of the installed RAM. In this case, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a total bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. While this is a high-bandwidth platform, the shared nature of the memory means the GPU and CPU are competing for the same resources, which can impact performance in memory-intensive scenarios.

The benchmark results for the GPU reflect its position in the market. It scores 5310 in Passmark G3D and 25 in Passmark DirectX 12, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6400, is only 0.3% faster in average score, indicating it sits at the very entry-level of discrete graphics performance. In Pc Building Simulator, this translates to the low FPS figures observed. The GPU's limited pixel rate (41.58 GPixel/s) and texture rate (83.17 GTexel/s) are simply not sufficient to drive modern resolutions at high settings. The data shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, and its capabilities define the entire performance envelope of this combo.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo are a trade-off between visual fidelity and playability. The primary goal should be to maintain a frame rate above 60 FPS for a smooth simulation experience. The only configuration that achieves this is 1920x1080 with Low settings, which produces an average of 77 FPS. This is the clear recommendation for users who prioritize smoothness and responsiveness.

For users who want a better visual experience at 1080p, Medium settings are a viable alternative, providing an average of 54 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS threshold but remains playable, especially in a slower-paced simulation game. The minimum FPS of 46 suggests that there may be occasional dips, but overall, the experience should be stable enough for most players. High and Ultra settings at 1080p, with averages of 38 and 36 FPS, are not recommended as they fall into a range where the game may feel noticeably less fluid.

At 2560x1440, the recommendations are more constrained. Low settings, with an average of 48 FPS, are the only viable option for a reasonably smooth experience. Medium settings drop to an average of 34 FPS, which is likely to feel choppy. High and Ultra settings at this resolution are not recommended due to their low average frame rates of 24 and 23 FPS. At 3840x2160, no settings are recommended for a playable experience, as even the Low preset only achieves an average of 25 FPS. The conclusion is that users should stick to 1080p and use the Low or Medium presets to get the best balance of performance and visual quality from this hardware.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a high-performance processor that is massively overqualified for the graphical demands of Pc Building Simulator when paired with the Radeon 760M. This CPU is built on the Zen 5 architecture using a 4 nm process and is part of the Strix Halo generation. It features 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It also has a substantial cache hierarchy, including 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU's synthetic performance is in the top tier. It scores 5463 in Cinebench R15 multicore and 35314 in Cinebench R23 multicore. Its Geekbench multicore score is 20992, and its Passmark multithread score is 54934. These numbers place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900K, which it trails by only 1.7% in average benchmark score. This demonstrates that the processor has more than enough compute power to handle the game's simulation logic, physics calculations, and AI.

However, this CPU power is largely irrelevant to the final frame rate in this configuration. The game's rendering is entirely dependent on the GPU. Since the Radeon 760M can only produce a maximum of 77 FPS at 1080p Low, the CPU's potential to drive hundreds of frames per second is never realized. The CPU is effectively waiting on the GPU for most of the time. The data suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any tested resolution or setting, as the FPS scaling is directly tied to the GPU's workload. The 16-core, 32-thread processor is a future-proofing asset for other tasks, but in this specific gaming scenario, it plays a secondary, supporting role.