Pc Building Simulator

Settings Recommendations

The measured data for Pc Building Simulator reveals an interesting pattern: the gap between High and Ultra presets is remarkably small, while the jump from Medium to High is substantial. At 1080p, High delivers 135.5 FPS and Ultra delivers 130.2 FPS — a difference of only 5.3 FPS — yet Medium sits at 188.7 FPS, a full 53.2 FPS above High. This suggests the Ultra preset is adding visual complexity that costs performance without proportional gains in this simulation title.

For the best experience per the measured rows, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot. At 1440p, Medium produces 117.4 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 4K, Medium still holds 60 FPS exactly. The Medium preset offers the largest performance headroom while maintaining a playable experience across all three resolutions. High at 4K drops to 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard for fluid motion, making it a less attractive option at the highest resolution.

Low settings, while delivering the highest frame rates (264.4 FPS at 1080p, 171 FPS at 1440p, 88.2 FPS at 4K), likely sacrifice too much visual fidelity in a game where component aesthetics and system-building visuals are central to the experience. The data indicates Medium provides the best balance between visual quality and performance, especially considering that this game's core gameplay involves building and managing PCs — a setting where visual clarity of components matters.

Ultra at 1080p achieves 130.2 FPS, which is still highly playable, but the 0.9 FPS difference between Ultra and High at 4K (43.2 versus 43) suggests that the Ultra preset's additional effects are negligible at higher resolutions. Users with 1080p displays could reasonably choose Ultra, but the performance-per-visual-gain ratio favors Medium or High.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X brings substantial processing power to this simulation title. With 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, this CPU can handle the complex simulation logic that Pc Building Simulator uses to model component interactions, thermal calculations, and power draw. The processor's 64 MB of L3 cache provides ample room for the game's data structures, while the dual-channel DDR4 memory interface supports 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Benchmark results show this CPU achieves a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49062. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600K, scores 49166 — a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 5950X is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49367, putting the 5950X 0.6% behind. Against the AMD EPYC 4345P, the 5950X trails by 1.1% (49595 versus 49062), while it leads the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.7% (48698 versus 49062).

The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are particularly relevant for Pc Building Simulator. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38607 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 45424 indicate strong parallel processing, which likely benefits the game's background calculations. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10810 and max-thread score of 11597 show that the CPU scales well with thread count, which is useful for a simulation that may spawn numerous concurrent processes for each simulated component.

However, the game's performance at higher resolutions suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this combination. The frame rates scale inversely with resolution in a pattern that points toward GPU limitation at 4K, while the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5450 and 3DMark single-thread score of 944) remains strong enough to avoid constraining frame rates at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, provides the rendering power for this combination. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the GPU offers 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock reaches 2460 MHz, and the FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS indicates solid compute capability for a mainstream GPU.

The GPU's benchmark positioning shows a 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average score of 23181. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23321 (0.6% ahead of the RTX 4060), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti at 23338 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Arc B580 at 23021 (0.7% behind). The AMD Radeon 760M scores 22999, placing it 0.8% behind the RTX 4060.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity becomes a critical factor at higher resolutions and settings. The measured data shows that 4K Ultra produces 43.2 FPS, which is nearly identical to 4K High at 43 FPS — a pattern that suggests the GPU is running into memory or compute limits rather than architectural inefficiency. The 128-bit memory bus, while sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, may contribute to the sharp performance drop at 4K.

The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores are present, though Pc Building Simulator likely does not heavily utilize ray tracing or DLSS features. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern rendering paths, but the game's 2019 release date suggests it may not leverage the full feature set of this GPU.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 993rd out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the combination in the 44th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 56% of tested combinations deliver higher average frame rates in this game.

The ranking is notable because the CPU is a high-end processor with a 93rd percentile rating among CPUs, while the GPU sits at only the 66th percentile. This imbalance suggests the RTX 4060 is the limiting factor for this combo's performance in Pc Building Simulator. The data confirms this interpretation: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 264.4 FPS, which demonstrates the CPU's capacity to drive very high frame rates when the GPU has less work to do. But at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 43.2 FPS, indicating the GPU cannot maintain the same throughput when rendering load increases.

The combo's mid-pack ranking reflects this GPU-bound reality. For a simulation game that may not be heavily optimized for high-end hardware, the RTX 4060's mid-range positioning restricts overall performance despite the 5950X's capabilities. Users seeking higher rankings would need a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows 1440p Medium provides 117.4 FPS, which offers a strong balance of visual quality and smoothness. At 4K, frame rates drop to 60 FPS on Medium, which is playable but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes.

Q: How much performance is lost when going from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 188.7 FPS at 1080p to 117.4 FPS at 1440p, then to 60 FPS at 4K. This represents a 68.2% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this combo?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 66th percentile ranking indicate the RTX 4060 constrains performance, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.

Q: How does this combo compare to similar systems?

A: The combo ranks 993rd out of 1769 tested combinations, placing it in the middle of the pack. The CPU performs within 1.1% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU sits within 0.8% of its closest competitors.

Q: What settings should I use at 4K?

A: Medium settings at 4K achieve exactly 60 FPS, making it the only preset that reaches the 60 FPS standard at this resolution. High and Ultra both fall below 45 FPS at 4K.

Q: Does the Ultra preset provide meaningful gains over High?

A: The measured data shows Ultra is only 0.2 FPS higher than High at 4K (43.2 versus 43), and 5.3 FPS lower than High at 1080p (130.2 versus 135.5). The Ultra preset does not consistently improve performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 264.4 FPS on Low, 188.7 FPS on Medium, 135.5 FPS on High, and 130.2 FPS on Ultra. The progression shows diminishing returns as settings increase: Low to Medium represents a 75.7 FPS drop, Medium to High a 53.2 FPS drop, and High to Ultra only a 5.3 FPS drop.

At 2560x1440, frame rates are 171 FPS on Low, 117.4 FPS on Medium, 86.2 FPS on High, and 82.7 FPS on Ultra. The relative pattern mirrors 1080p, with the gap between High and Ultra narrowing to 3.5 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 53.6 FPS, and from Medium to High is 31.2 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the combo produces 88.2 FPS on Low, 60 FPS on Medium, 43 FPS on High, and 43.2 FPS on Ultra. Notably, Ultra slightly outperforms High at this resolution, which is an anomaly in the data. The drop from Low to Medium is 28.2 FPS, and from Medium to High is 17 FPS.

Across all resolutions, the Low preset provides the highest frame rates but likely sacrifices visual quality. Medium consistently maintains playable frame rates at every resolution, while High and Ultra become less viable as resolution increases.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals where the bottleneck lies. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 264.4 at 1080p to 171 at 1440p (a 35.3% reduction), then to 88.2 at 4K (a 48.4% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline indicates the GPU's rendering load increases substantially with pixel count.

At Medium settings, the scaling is similar: 188.7 FPS at 1080p falls to 117.4 FPS at 1440p (37.8% reduction), then to 60 FPS at 4K (48.9% reduction). The consistent percentage drops across settings suggest the GPU is the primary constraint, as a CPU bottleneck would show less resolution-dependent scaling.

High settings show 135.5 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 86.2 FPS at 1440p (36.4% reduction) and 43 FPS at 4K (50.1% reduction). Ultra follows the same pattern: 130.2 FPS to 82.7 FPS (36.5% reduction) to 43.2 FPS (47.8% reduction).

The scaling pattern strongly indicates GPU limitation. The RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are likely constraining performance at 4K, where memory bandwidth demands increase significantly. The CPU's strong multi-threading capabilities cannot compensate for the GPU's bandwidth limitations at higher resolutions. For users targeting 4K, the data suggests lowering settings to Medium is necessary to maintain 60 FPS, while 1440p Medium offers the best balance of resolution and performance.