Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title that tasks players with assembling and benchmarking virtual hardware, proves to be a demanding environment for this particular pairing. The combination of an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor and an Intel Arc B370 integrated GPU produces a dataset that clearly illustrates the boundaries of playability. The measured FPS across various resolutions and settings reveals a system that is consistently constrained by its graphics solution, with the CPU's substantial processing power remaining largely underutilized in this specific workload.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows a steep and predictable decline as resolution increases, which is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 113 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings drops the average to 71 FPS, a reduction of 42 frames. The jump to 4K at Low settings further reduces the average to 37 FPS. This scaling pattern demonstrates that the rendering workload is directly proportional to the pixel count, which places the entire burden on the graphics processor.

The trend continues across all quality presets. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS falls from 56 at 1080p to 36 at 1440p and then to 19 at 4K. This consistent halving of performance with each major resolution step is a hallmark of a system where the GPU's fill rate and pixel processing capabilities are the limiting factor. The CPU is not the bottleneck here; if it were, we would expect to see less variation in FPS as the resolution changes, since the CPU's workload would remain relatively constant while the GPU's workload increased.

The data suggests that the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is particularly steep, with roughly a 36-37% performance drop across all settings. The transition from 1440p to 4K also shows a significant hit, with performance nearly halving again. This indicates that the Intel Arc B370's memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are severely taxed at higher resolutions. The system is not just slowing down; it is hitting a hard architectural wall where the integrated GPU's limited resources are fully saturated, leaving no headroom for higher resolutions without a substantial sacrifice in frame rate.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the decisive component in this pairing. Its performance, as measured by a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184, places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, making it one of the least performant graphics solutions in the database. This is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 25W TDP, a base clock of 300 MHz, and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The architecture is Xe3-LPG on a 3 nm process, but its physical resources are minimal, with 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and only 20 ROPs.

The GPU's memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This is a critical detail that explains the performance scaling. With "System Dependent" bandwidth, the GPU is heavily reliant on the CPU's memory controller and the speed of the DDR4 memory. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports dual-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is a significant limitation for an integrated GPU that needs to share that bandwidth with the CPU.

Benchmark results confirm this GPU's position. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, and AMD Radeon HD 7650M, all of which are over a decade old. The deltaPct values are remarkably small, with the Arc B370 trailing the HD 5570 by just 0.2% and the HD 5770 by 0.5% in their average scores. This places the Arc B370 in a performance class that is fundamentally unsuited for modern gaming at high resolutions, and the measured FPS data reflects this reality. The GPU is capable of producing playable frame rates only when the rendering load is minimized, such as at 1080p with Low settings.

CPU Role

In stark contrast to the GPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a high-end desktop processor. With 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, it boasts a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 and single-core score of 1527 are indicative of strong processing power. The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 87, meaning it outperforms 87% of all processors in the database, a far cry from the GPU's 5th percentile ranking.

The CPU's role in this game appears to be largely passive. Pc Building Simulator is not a title known for demanding AI or complex physics simulations that would stress a 12-core processor. The benchmark results show that the CPU is never the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see lower FPS at lower resolutions, where the GPU has an easier time, but the data shows the opposite. At 1080p Low, the system hits 113 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU frames faster than the GPU can render them.

The Ryzen 9 5900X's nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are mobile processors like the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, with deltaPct values of 0.3% and 0.4% respectively. This indicates that while the 5900X is a powerful desktop chip, its raw compute performance is comparable to newer, efficient mobile parts. However, this comparison is irrelevant to the game's performance. The measured FPS is almost entirely dictated by the Intel Arc B370's capabilities. The CPU provides a stable, high-performance platform, but its headroom is never fully utilized in this test.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset provides a clear picture of the system's performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the system behaves as follows:

• Low: 113 avg FPS
• Medium: 80 avg FPS (min 68, max 92)
• High: 56 avg FPS
• Ultra: 54 avg FPS

At 2560x1440, the frame rates fall significantly:

• Low: 71 avg FPS
• Medium: 50 avg FPS (min 43, max 58)
• High: 36 avg FPS
• Ultra: 34 avg FPS

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable rates:

• Low: 37 avg FPS
• Medium: 26 avg FPS (min 22, max 30)
• High: 19 avg FPS
• Ultra: 18 avg FPS

The data reveals a few interesting patterns. First, the gap between High and Ultra settings is remarkably small at every resolution. At 1080p, the difference is only 2 FPS (56 vs 54). At 1440p, it is also 2 FPS (36 vs 34). At 4K, the gap narrows to just 1 FPS (19 vs 18). This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces settings that have a negligible impact on this particular GPU, likely due to a bottleneck elsewhere.

Second, the Medium preset provides a substantial boost over High, with an average increase of 24 FPS at 1080p, 14 FPS at 1440p, and 7 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the jump from High to Medium is where the most significant performance headroom is found. The Low preset offers another large jump, particularly at 1080p where it adds 33 FPS over Medium. These results highlight the GPU's extreme sensitivity to settings changes, which is a direct consequence of its limited shading units and ROPs.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination capable of running the game at 4K?

A: The data shows that 4K is not a viable resolution for this setup. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 37 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 18 FPS on Ultra. Even the best-case scenario is below the standard for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the best resolution to use for a consistent 60 FPS experience?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 with Low settings is the only configuration that achieves a 60+ FPS average, hitting 113 FPS. At 1440p, the best average is 71 FPS on Low, but this is still above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X has an average benchmark score of 41376. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, scores 41263, a delta of 0.3%. The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41576, which is a -0.5% delta from the 5900X's score. The CPU is a high performer, but it is not the limiting factor in this game.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated memory?

A: No. The Intel Arc B370's memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's main memory. The bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which in this case is tied to the Ryzen 9 5900X's dual-channel DDR4 support.

Q: What is the difference in performance between High and Ultra settings?

A: The performance difference is minimal. At 1080p, the average FPS only drops from 56 to 54 (a 2 FPS difference). At 1440p, it drops from 36 to 34 (also 2 FPS), and at 4K, it drops from 19 to 18 (1 FPS). The Ultra preset offers no meaningful visual benefit for the negligible performance cost.

Q: What is the GPU's overall performance ranking?

A: The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it in the same performance class as the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and AMD Radeon HD 7650M.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data clearly indicates that visual fidelity must be severely compromised to achieve playable frame rates. For a target of 60 FPS, the only viable option is 1080p with Low settings, which delivers an average of 113 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the target and suggests that the game will run smoothly.

If a higher resolution is desired, 1440p with Low settings is the next best option, producing an average of 71 FPS. This is still above 60 FPS, but the margin is smaller. The Medium preset at 1440p drops to 50 FPS, which may be acceptable for a simulation game where frame pacing is less critical than in fast-paced action titles. However, it falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

For users who prioritize image quality over raw frame rate, 1080p with Medium settings offers an average of 80 FPS, which is still very playable. The High preset at 1080p drops to 56 FPS, which is a significant reduction for a modest visual gain. The Ultra preset offers almost no performance difference from High, so it is not a recommended choice. Overall, the sweet spot for this combination is 1080p with Medium settings, balancing a smooth experience with acceptable visuals. The 4K resolution should be avoided entirely, as even the Low preset fails to maintain a consistent 30 FPS in all scenarios.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2761 out of 3002 possible combinations. This places it in the bottom 8% of all systems that have been benchmarked for this game. The ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's extreme performance limitations, as the CPU is a high-end part that would rank much higher on its own.

The comboRankInGame of 2761 is a stark indicator that this is not a recommended configuration for this title. The 241 positions from the bottom of the list suggest that there are a substantial number of other hardware pairings that will provide a better experience. The data shows that the system is capable of running the game, but only at the lowest settings and resolutions. The performance headroom of the Ryzen 9 5900X is completely wasted, as the Intel Arc B370 cannot translate that processing power into higher frame rates.

This ranking effectively summarizes the entire dataset: a powerful CPU is rendered irrelevant by a GPU that is over a decade behind the performance curve. The measured FPS values are all consistent with a GPU that scores in the 5th percentile, and the experience for a player would be one of constant compromise. This is a combo that is technically functional but practically disappointing for gaming purposes.