Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a Simulation title with measured results for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The data covers three resolutions and four settings, with average FPS values from 411.2 at 1080p Low to 66.9 at 4K Ultra. The combination is ranked 191 out of 1769 tested combos in this game. The CPU carries an average benchmark score of 40468 and sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs; the GPU averages 44900 and sits at the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The dataset is marked as measured, and no minimum or maximum FPS values are included.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall rank of the Ryzen 7 7700 + RTX 4070 Ti combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The combo is ranked 191 out of 1769 tested combos. That rank is specific to this game's measured dataset.

Q: How close are the CPU's nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40468. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40431), 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40262), 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-13905H (40712), and 1.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T (39995). Its percentile among all CPUs is 91.

Q: What are the measured FPS at 1080p Ultra and 4K Ultra?

A: At 1080p Ultra the average is 203.6 FPS. At 2560x1440 Ultra it is 129.8 FPS. At 3840x2160 Ultra it is 66.9 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti compare with its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 44900. It is 0.6% behind the RTX 5090 Mobile (45152), 1.5% behind the Intel Arc A730M (45592), 1.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (44195), and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45642). Its percentile among all GPUs is 85.

Q: What memory specifications does the RTX 4070 Ti bring to this game?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz and 21 Gbps effective. The memory bandwidth is 504.2 GB/s.

Q: What CPU configuration is behind these results?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It includes 32 MB of shared L3 cache and uses a 65 W TDP.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranking places this pairing at 191 of 1769 in Pc Building Simulator. That is a strong result, though not the top of the database. The CPU is a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.80 GHz, a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, 32 MB of shared L3 cache, DDR5 memory support, and dual-channel memory with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace part with 7680 shading units, 60 RT cores, 240 tensor cores, and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. Both components sit in the upper percentiles: the CPU at 91 and the GPU at 85.

The nearest-rival comparisons are tight. The CPU's nearest rivals are separated from its average score by between 0.1% and 1.2%, while the GPU's nearest rivals are separated by between 0.6% and 1.6%. This suggests the combo is not an outlier among similarly positioned parts. The measured 1080p Low result of 411.2 FPS and the 1080p Ultra result of 203.6 FPS both show that this configuration has enough headroom to produce very high frame rates in Pc Building Simulator.

GPU Role

The RTX 4070 Ti is the main rendering component in this pairing. It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective. The base clock is 2310 MHz and the boost clock is 2610 MHz. The GPU contains 7680 shading units, 240 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 60 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores. Its FP32 output is 40.09 TFLOPS, its texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s. The GPU is built on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, and it connects over PCIe 4.0 x16 in a dual-slot form factor.

These resources determine the settings scaling seen in the measured FPS. At 1080p Low, the GPU delivers 411.2 FPS; at 1080p Ultra, 203.6 FPS. At 4K Low, it still delivers 142 FPS, while 4K Ultra is 66.9 FPS. The large gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution points to the GPU's shading and memory workload being a major factor in the final frame rate. Notably, 4K Low (142 FPS) is slightly above 1440p High (133.4 FPS), which shows that dropping the settings level can offset a large resolution increase in this benchmark.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All values below are average FPS figures. The dataset does not include min or max FPS values.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 411.2 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 305.2 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 216.2 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 203.6 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 270.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 191.9 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 133.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 129.8 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 142 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 100.6 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 71.4 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 66.9 |

Within each resolution, the settings order is consistent: Low delivers the highest average, followed by Medium, High, then Ultra. At 1080p, Low averages 411.2 FPS, Medium 305.2 FPS, High 216.2 FPS, and Ultra 203.6 FPS. At 1440p, the same order produces 270.7, 191.9, 133.4, and 129.8 FPS. At 4K, Low is 142, Medium 100.6, High 71.4, and Ultra 66.9 FPS. The High and Ultra results at 1440p are close: 133.4 and 129.8, while at 4K they are 71.4 and 66.9. The 1080p results show the widest absolute spread among settings, with Low at 411.2 and Ultra at 203.6.

Resolution Scaling

The same settings were measured at three resolutions, and every setting loses FPS as resolution increases. For Low settings, the average goes from 411.2 at 1080p to 270.7 at 1440p to 142 at 4K. For Medium, it goes from 305.2 to 191.9 to 100.6. For High, from 216.2 to 133.4 to 71.4. For Ultra, from 203.6 to 129.8 to 66.9.

This pattern is consistent across all four settings. The 1080p numbers are so high, particularly the 411.2 Low result, that the CPU and memory subsystem are clearly not imposing a low ceiling on this configuration. As the pixel count increases, the GPU's pixel fill rate, shading units, and memory bandwidth become more significant. At 4K Ultra, the result falls to 66.9, the lowest measured value in the dataset. At 4K Low, by contrast, the GPU still produces 142 FPS. That means reducing the rendering workload at high resolution has a direct impact on output. The combined evidence points to a configuration where the limiting component depends on the load: at 1080p, frame rates are extremely high across all settings; at 4K, the GPU is the part being stressed most heavily by the rise in resolution.