Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
174
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 174 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 62 65 93 131
1440p QHD 119 125 177 250
1080p Full HD 189 198 281 396

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 131
3840x2160 Medium 93
3840x2160 High 65
3840x2160 Ultra 62
2560x1440 Low 250
2560x1440 Medium 177
2560x1440 High 125
2560x1440 Ultra 119
1920x1080 Low 396
1920x1080 Medium 281
1920x1080 High 198
1920x1080 Ultra 189

Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis

# Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

This combination of an 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and a Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers a remarkably strong experience in Pc Building Simulator, with the data showing this pairing ranks 632nd out of 3,723 tested combinations — placing it in the top 17% of all configs. The measured frame rates are consistently high across every resolution and preset, with the only notable weakness appearing at 4K Ultra where the average dips to 62 FPS. This is a system that handles the simulation genre's demands with authority, though the resolution scaling pattern reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as pixel count rises.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 brings 8 cores and 16 threads to the table, built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) using a 5 nm process from TSMC. Its base clock sits at 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the chip carries a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop-class processor on the AM5 socket with DDR5 memory support via a dual-channel bus delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics as a fallback.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is substantial because the game simulates system assembly and boot processes, which involve significant logic and state tracking. The 16 threads provide ample parallelism for the simulation's background calculations, and the benchmark data supports this: the processor scores 8,484 in 3DMark's 16-thread test and 8,479 at max threads, showing nearly linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads. Single-thread performance is also strong at 1,049 in 3DMark's single-thread test, which matters for the game's UI responsiveness and event handling.

The Ryzen 7 7700's multi-threaded capabilities shine in Cinebench R23, where it scores 18,760 multicore versus 1,930 single-core. This 9.7x ratio between multicore and single-core scores indicates the CPU can spread work effectively across all 16 threads, which aligns well with a simulation game that tracks many simultaneous system components. The Geekbench results reinforce this pattern: 15,371 multicore versus 2,525 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 34,470 further confirms that this CPU's strength lies in handling multiple concurrent operations, which is exactly what Pc Building Simulator demands when managing CPU, GPU, RAM, and storage interactions in the simulated build.

Compared to its nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database, the Ryzen 7 7700 holds its ground with a 0.1% lead over the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (average score 40,048 versus 40,081), while trailing the Intel Core 5 221E by 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 9 270 by 0.4%, and the Intel Core i9-13905H by 0.6%. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the 7700 performs essentially on par with its closest competition. Its 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs further confirms it is a high-tier processor for this game's workload.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip (codename Plum Bonito), manufactured on a 5 nm process with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 1,387 MHz with a boost clock of 2,394 MHz and a game clock of 2,025 MHz, while memory runs at 2,500 MHz (20 Gbps effective). The card has 5,376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, with 84 ray-tracing cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role is primarily visual rendering of the workshop environment, component models, and the PC case internals. The 20 GB VRAM is far more than this game requires, as evidenced by the fact that even at 4K Ultra the system achieves playable frame rates without any memory-related stutter — the minimum FPS at 4K Medium is 79, suggesting ample headroom. The GPU's raw compute power, rated at 51.48 TFLOPS FP32, is more than sufficient for a simulation game that doesn't push complex shader workloads.

The RX 7900 XT's benchmark scores show a mixed picture: it scores 29,009 in PassMark G3D and 16,828 in GPU Compute, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623. Interestingly, the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs is just 55th, and its nearest rivals in the database are notably weaker products like the AMD Radeon 660M (integrated graphics) and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, with the RX 7900 XT trailing the RX 570X by 0.9% and leading the RX 9070 XT by 1.5%. This suggests the benchmark database's GPU scoring may not fully capture this card's gaming performance in this specific title, or that Pc Building Simulator is not particularly GPU-intensive.

The measured frame rates support the latter interpretation. At 1080p High, the system averages 198 FPS, and even at 4K Ultra it maintains 62 FPS. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth ensure that texture streaming and memory allocation never become bottlenecks, which is critical in a game where users can install multiple GPU models in a single system and view them from various angles.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a classic pattern where the GPU becomes progressively more limiting as resolution increases, but the CPU remains dominant at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers extremely high frame rates: 396 FPS at Low, 281 FPS at Medium, 198 FPS at High, and 189 FPS at Ultra. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary bottleneck, as even the low preset achieves nearly 400 FPS — far beyond what any display can show, indicating the GPU is barely taxed while the CPU handles the simulation logic.

Moving to 1440p, the frame rates drop significantly but remain high: 250 FPS at Low, 177 FPS at Medium, 125 FPS at High, and 119 FPS at Ultra. This represents a 37-40% drop from 1080p across presets, which is consistent with a system where the GPU is starting to take on more of the load but the CPU still has plenty of headroom. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a minimum FPS of 150 and maximum of 204, indicating stable performance without severe frame time spikes.

At 4K, the scaling becomes more pronounced: 131 FPS at Low, 93 FPS at Medium, 65 FPS at High, and 62 FPS at Ultra. The drop from 1080p Low (396 FPS) to 4K Low (131 FPS) is a 67% reduction, while the drop from 1080p Ultra (189 FPS) to 4K Ultra (62 FPS) is 67% as well — remarkably consistent. This uniform scaling across presets indicates that the GPU is now the clear bottleneck at 4K, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p and the rendering load scales accordingly.

The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is minimal (65 vs 62 FPS, a 4.6% drop), suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional visual effects are relatively modest in this game. The Medium preset at 4K shows the only measured minimum FPS value (79), which is still well above playable thresholds. This pattern indicates that users aiming for 4K should stick with High settings to maintain 65 FPS average, while those at 1080p or 1440p can easily enable Ultra without dropping below 119 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 632nd out of 3,723 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all configs tested. This is a strong showing, though not top-tier — the top 631 combinations presumably feature more powerful CPUs or GPUs, or both. Given that the CPU ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU ranks in the 55th percentile among all GPUs, the combo's overall ranking suggests that the CPU is doing more heavy lifting than the GPU in this game.

The ranking makes sense when considering the game's nature: Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title where CPU logic dominates, and the GPU's role is secondary. The Ryzen 7 7700's high single-thread and multi-thread scores (1,049 and 8,484 in 3DMark, respectively) position it well for this workload, while the RX 7900 XT's mid-pack GPU percentile ranking (55th) means it's not the strongest card in the database but still provides ample rendering power.

Comparing to other potential pairings, the CPU's closest rivals — Ryzen AI 9 365, Core 5 221E, Ryzen 9 270, and Core i9-13905H — all have similar average benchmark scores (within 0.6%), so any of these CPUs paired with the RX 7900 XT would likely produce similar results. The GPU's nearest rivals in the database are much weaker cards (Radeon 660M, RTX A2000 Mobile, RX 570X), which suggests the RX 7900 XT's benchmark score doesn't reflect its gaming prowess in this title, or that the database's GPU scoring methodology weights different workloads than what Pc Building Simulator requires.

The 632nd rank out of 3,723 means this combo outperforms 3,091 other tested configurations, which is a substantial margin. For a simulation game that doesn't demand extreme GPU power, this pairing is well-balanced — the CPU provides the computational muscle for simulation logic, while the GPU ensures smooth rendering at all resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 189 FPS average, which is far beyond any display's refresh rate and provides a completely smooth experience. The Low preset at 396 FPS is overkill, and the Medium preset at 281 FPS offers no practical benefit over Ultra since both exceed typical 144Hz or 240Hz monitor capabilities. For 1080p users, Ultra is the obvious choice — it provides the best visual quality with no playability compromise.

At 1440p, the recommendation is similarly clear: Ultra at 119 FPS average is excellent, and the drop from High (125 FPS) to Ultra (119 FPS) is only 4.8%, making Ultra the best value in terms of visual fidelity per frame. The Medium preset at 177 FPS is unnecessary unless the user has a 165Hz or higher refresh rate display and wants to maximize frame rates, but the 119 FPS at Ultra is already smooth for most users.

At 4K, the situation is more nuanced. The Ultra preset averages 62 FPS, which is playable but may feel less smooth on high-refresh displays. The High preset at 65 FPS is only 4.8% faster, so the visual quality difference between High and Ultra likely justifies choosing Ultra if the user has a 60Hz display. However, for users with 120Hz or higher displays, the Medium preset at 93 FPS is the sweet spot — it delivers a 43% improvement over High (65 FPS) while still looking good, with a minimum FPS of 79 ensuring no drops below playable levels. The Low preset at 131 FPS is the maximum performance option but sacrifices visual quality significantly.

The data indicates that the Medium preset at 4K provides the best balance of performance and quality, with its measured minimum of 79 FPS ensuring consistent frame delivery. For those prioritizing visual fidelity over frame rate, Ultra at 4K is still viable at 62 FPS average, but the small gain over High may not justify the drop. Overall, the recommendation is: Ultra at 1080p and 1440p, Medium at 4K for high-refresh displays, or High at 4K for 60Hz displays.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Pc Building Simulator at 4K 60 FPS?

A: Yes. At 4K High settings, the average FPS is 65, which exceeds 60 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 62 FPS, which is still above 60. The Medium preset at 4K delivers 93 FPS average with a minimum of 79 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The data suggests the CPU plays a larger role. The Ryzen 7 7700 ranks in the 87th percentile among CPUs, while the RX 7900 XT ranks in the 55th percentile among GPUs. The combo ranks 632nd out of 3,723, indicating the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (8,484 in 3DMark 16-thread, 18,760 in Cinebench R23 multicore) is likely the primary driver of the high frame rates.

Q: What is the best preset to use at 1440p?

A: Ultra is the best choice at 1440p. It delivers 119 FPS average, which is only 4.8% lower than High (125 FPS) but provides better visual quality. The Medium preset at 177 FPS offers no practical benefit unless using a display with a refresh rate above 144Hz.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 632nd out of 3,723 tested combos, placing it in the top 17% of all configurations. It outperforms 3,091 other tested systems in Pc Building Simulator.

Q: Is 20 GB of VRAM necessary for this game?

A: The RX 7900 XT's 20 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient. Even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains 62 FPS with no indication of VRAM-related performance issues. The game's modest visual demands mean the 800.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is likely the more relevant factor for smooth texture streaming.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with this system?

A: At 1080p, the system delivers extremely high frame rates across all presets: 396 FPS at Low, 281 FPS at Medium, 198 FPS at High, and 189 FPS at Ultra. All of these exceed typical display refresh rates, so Ultra is recommended for the best visual experience.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

VRAM 20 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2394 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 131.0
3840x2160 Medium 93.0
3840x2160 High 65.0
3840x2160 Ultra 62.0
2560x1440 Low 250.0
2560x1440 Medium 177.0
2560x1440 High 125.0
2560x1440 Ultra 119.0
1920x1080 Low 396.0
1920x1080 Medium 281.0
1920x1080 High 198.0
1920x1080 Ultra 189.0

Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 7 7700 + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700 + RX 7900 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.