Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, and the measured results place this combination at rank 961 out of 3723 tested combos for this game. That puts the combo in the top quarter of all configurations, which is a strong showing for a simulation title that tends to favor balanced systems. The RTX 4070 carries most of the weight here, and the 5700G provides enough CPU throughput to avoid holding the GPU back at most settings, though the data reveals some interesting bottlenecks at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s overall rank of 961 out of 3723 tested combinations places it in the 74th percentile of all systems tested for Pc Building Simulator. This is a solid result, but it is not a top-tier ranking, and the reason becomes clear when looking at the component-level data. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, has an average benchmark score of 37648 and sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, has an average benchmark score of 27051 and sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Both components are above average, yet the combo rank is slightly lower than what either component achieves individually, suggesting the pairing is good but not exceptional for this specific workload.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals in the database shows how tight the mid-range competition is. The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, which is just 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936). It is also 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-14400T (27166) and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1370P (26900). These sub-1% deltas mean the CPU’s performance is effectively tied with several other processors, and any ranking difference comes down to noise rather than a meaningful gap.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 scores 37648, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628, 0.1% ahead) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507, 0.4% ahead). It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) by 1.3% and leads the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157) by 1.3%. Again, these deltas are small, so the GPU’s 81st percentile ranking reflects its position in a crowded field of similarly performing graphics cards. For Pc Building Simulator specifically, the combo’s 74th-percentile rank suggests that the game’s simulation workload does not scale perfectly with raw component scores, and the measured FPS numbers confirm that the GPU is often the limiting factor at higher settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings for this combo?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 175 FPS. This is the lowest average at 1080p, but it remains well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with High settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS drops to 61, which is right at the edge of playable for a 60 Hz display. The Ultra preset at 4K is slightly lower at 58 FPS average, making High the better choice for 4K gaming.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck this system in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows that the RTX 4070 is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 331 FPS, which is extremely high and suggests the CPU can feed the GPU well. But at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 58 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated while the CPU has headroom.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a high refresh rate?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 116, and with Medium it is 164. Both are suitable for 144 Hz monitors. At 1080p, the combo exceeds 175 FPS on all presets, making it ideal for 240 Hz displays.

Q: How does the combo’s rank compare to its component percentiles?

A: The combo ranks 961 out of 3723 (74th percentile), while the CPU is in the 79th percentile and the GPU is in the 81st percentile. The combo rank is slightly lower than either component’s individual percentile, meaning the pairing does not extract the full potential of both parts in this game.

Q: Are there any measured minimum FPS values for this combo?

A: Yes, the dataset includes minimum FPS only for Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 221 FPS; at 1440p Medium, it is 140 FPS; and at 4K Medium, it is 73 FPS. All other presets only have average FPS values.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3, which is a typical layout for this generation. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

For Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is more relevant than its single-thread speed, given the simulation nature of the game. In Cinebench R23, the 5700G scores 12830.5 in multi-core and 1494 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 9950 multi-core and 1894 single-core. These numbers indicate a capable processor that can handle background tasks and game logic, but the game’s FPS results suggest that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 331 FPS, which is near the practical limit for many displays, and that high frame rate indicates the 5700G can push frames quickly when the GPU is not stressed.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K, has nearly identical average benchmark scores (27097 vs. 27051, a 0.2% difference), so the 5700G offers comparable performance to a high-end 2018 processor. The 5700G also includes integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, which is not relevant when a discrete RTX 4070 is installed, but it does add flexibility for troubleshooting or secondary displays. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking across all CPUs means it outperforms most processors in the database, but its 16 MB of L3 cache is smaller than some newer chips, which could impact certain workloads. For this game, though, the CPU delivers enough throughput to keep the GPU fed at all measured settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1080p, the lowest average is 175 FPS on Ultra, while High reaches 184 FPS, Medium hits 260 FPS, and Low peaks at 331 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p also has a measured minimum of 221 FPS and maximum of 299 FPS, showing that frame times are consistent. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at Ultra and High, but at Low settings the CPU becomes more involved, still delivering over 300 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, the averages drop but remain high. Ultra averages 110 FPS, High averages 116 FPS, Medium averages 164 FPS, and Low averages 232 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p has a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 189 FPS, which is a tight range that suggests stable performance. At 1440p, the RTX 4070 is still capable of driving high refresh rates, and the 5700G does not appear to be a constraint, as the FPS drops are proportional to the resolution increase.

At 4K, the averages fall significantly. Ultra averages 58 FPS, High averages 61 FPS, Medium averages 86 FPS, and Low averages 121 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K has a minimum of 73 FPS and a maximum of 99 FPS, which is the only 4K preset with min/max data. These results show that 4K is the resolution where the combo starts to struggle at the highest settings, with Ultra and High both hovering near the 60 FPS line. Low settings at 4K still deliver 121 FPS, which is impressive and indicates the GPU has enough headroom when visual effects are reduced.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals the bottleneck characteristics of this combo. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 331 at 1080p to 232 at 1440p (a 30% drop) and then to 121 at 4K (a 48% drop from 1440p). This scaling is roughly proportional to the pixel count increase, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario. At Ultra settings, the averages go from 175 at 1080p to 110 at 1440p (a 37% drop) and then to 58 at 4K (a 47% drop from 1440p). The larger drop at Ultra from 1080p to 1440p suggests the GPU is hitting a compute limit, not a memory bandwidth limit, as the RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

The fact that Low settings at 4K still achieve 121 FPS while Ultra at 4K only reaches 58 FPS indicates that the game’s graphical effects, not the resolution itself, are the primary cost. The RTX 4070 has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s. These specs suggest the GPU can handle high resolutions but struggles with the most demanding shaders. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, does not show signs of becoming a bottleneck at any resolution, as the FPS scaling follows the expected GPU workload curve.

The data also shows that the combo is less efficient at scaling from 1440p to 4K than from 1080p to 1440p. For example, at High settings, 1440p averages 116 FPS and 4K averages 61 FPS, which is a 47% drop, while 1080p averages 184 FPS and 1440p averages 116 FPS, which is a 37% drop. This suggests that the GPU is approaching its limits as resolution increases, and the 5700G has ample headroom to handle the additional CPU overhead. For users targeting 4K, the combo is best paired with a 60 Hz monitor and Medium or High settings, as Ultra will dip below the 60 FPS threshold.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 175 FPS, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor, and the High preset at 184 FPS is nearly identical. The Medium preset at 260 FPS is overkill for most displays, but it offers the best minimum FPS (221) and maximum FPS (299) in the dataset, making it the smoothest experience if frame time consistency is a priority. For 1080p, the recommendation is to use Ultra settings, as the visual quality increase over Medium comes with only a modest FPS cost, and the minimum FPS is not measured for Ultra, so the average is already above 175.

At 1440p, the choice is between High and Ultra. High averages 116 FPS, which is ideal for a 120 Hz or 144 Hz monitor, while Ultra averages 110 FPS, a negligible 5% difference. The Medium preset at 164 FPS is also viable for 165 Hz displays, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. The data shows that High at 1440p is the sweet spot, offering a 116 FPS average with no measured minimum frame drops, making it the best balance of quality and performance. Ultra at 1440p is also acceptable for 60 Hz or 100 Hz displays, but High provides more headroom for demanding scenes.

For 4K, the recommendations are more conservative. Ultra averages 58 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and may cause noticeable stuttering on a standard 60 Hz display. High averages 61 FPS, which barely clears the line, but the margin is thin. Medium averages 86 FPS, which is comfortable for 60 Hz and even allows for some headroom. Low averages 121 FPS, which is excellent for 4K high-refresh-rate monitors, though the visual quality is significantly reduced. The best 4K experience is Medium settings, which delivers 86 FPS with a measured minimum of 73 FPS and maximum of 99 FPS, ensuring consistent frame times. For users who prioritize visuals over frame rate, High at 61 FPS is acceptable, but Medium is the recommended preset for a smooth 4K experience on this combo.