Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 105 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 54 | 62 | 70 | 98 |
| 1440p QHD | 80 | 92 | 104 | 146 |
| 1080p Full HD | 106 | 122 | 137 | 193 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a compelling 1440p experience in Control, with the data showing a clear performance hierarchy that favors high refresh rate gaming at 1080p and smooth 60+ FPS gameplay at 1440p. The combo ranks in the 904th position out of 3720 tested configurations, placing it in the top quarter of all systems, which reflects a balanced pairing where the GPU carries the primary rendering load while the 8-core CPU provides sufficient headroom.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?*
A: The measured data shows 2560x1440 as the sweet spot, where High settings produce 92 FPS average and Medium settings hit 104 FPS, both well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, the system exceeds 100 FPS on all settings, while 3840x2160 drops to 54-70 FPS depending on preset.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37648 places it 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507). It trails the RTX 4080 Mobile by 1.3% (38135) but leads the Radeon PRO W6400 by 1.3% (37157).
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700G CPU a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 in this game?
A: The data indicates no significant bottleneck at standard gaming resolutions. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 899 and multi-thread score of 6629, combined with its 79th percentile ranking versus all CPUs, suggests it provides adequate processing power. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 193 FPS, showing the CPU can feed the GPU effectively.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce 146 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 80 FPS average. This represents a 66 FPS gap (45% reduction) when moving from the lowest to highest quality preset, with Medium at 104 FPS and High at 92 FPS filling the middle ground.
Q: Does the combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?
A: The measured data shows that 3840x2160 High settings average 62 FPS, which barely clears the 60 FPS mark. Medium settings at 4K average 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS, while Ultra falls to 54 FPS. Low settings at 4K reach 98 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 5700G's average benchmark score of 27051 is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936). It also trails the Core i5-14400T by 0.4% (27166) but leads the Core i7-1370P by 0.6% (26900).
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 serves as the primary performance driver in this configuration, and its memory subsystem is particularly relevant to Control's demanding visuals. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity proves sufficient for the game's texture-heavy environments, as evidenced by the consistent scaling from 1080p to 1440p where the frame rate drops by roughly 25% at each quality tier despite the 77% increase in pixel count.
The clock architecture shows a base frequency of 1920 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, while memory runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective throughput. These clocks allow the GPU to deliver 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which translates directly into the measured frame rates. At 1920x1080, the GPU achieves 122 FPS on High settings and 106 FPS on Ultra, indicating that the Ada Lovelace architecture handles the game's physics and particle effects without strain. The 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores are present but not explicitly benchmarked in the measured FPS data, so their impact remains qualitative.
The GPU's percentile ranking of 81 against all GPUs confirms its position as a high-end part, and its synthetic scores reinforce this. The PassMark G3D score of 26927 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 both sit well above average, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 showing strong DirectX 12 performance. This matters for Control, which leverages modern rendering features. The 64 ROPs and 184 TMUs provide ample pixel throughput (158.4 GPixel/s) and texture rate (455.4 GTexel/s), which explains why the GPU maintains playable frame rates even at 3840x2160.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data reveals a clear recommendation hierarchy for this combo, with the optimal setting depending on the user's display resolution. At 1920x1080, High settings deliver 122 FPS average, which is the best balance of visual quality and performance since Ultra only reduces the frame rate to 106 FPS while Medium sits at 137 FPS. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates at this resolution, Low achieves 193 FPS, but the 71 FPS jump from High to Low comes at a significant visual cost.
For 2560x1440 owners, High settings at 92 FPS represent the recommended choice, as this preset maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while preserving the game's atmospheric lighting and shadow quality. Medium settings at 104 FPS provide a safer buffer for demanding scenes, but the data shows High remains well within playable territory. Ultra at 80 FPS is also viable for those who want maximum fidelity, though the 12 FPS drop from High may not justify the visual uplift in all scenarios.
At 3840x2160, the recommendations become more conservative. Medium settings average 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS, making it the only 4K preset that consistently stays near the 60 FPS target. High settings average 62 FPS but lack reported minimum frame data, suggesting potential dips below the threshold. Ultra at 54 FPS falls short of ideal smoothness, while Low at 98 FPS sacrifices too much visual quality for the 4K resolution to be meaningful. The measured data therefore points to Medium as the best 4K experience, with High as an acceptable alternative for users tolerant of occasional frame drops.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of Ryzen 7 5700G and RTX 4070 achieves a combo rank of 904 out of 3720 tested configurations in Control, placing it in the 76th percentile of all systems. This ranking reflects a well-matched pairing where neither component severely limits the other. The GPU's 81st percentile performance relative to all GPUs is slightly higher than the combo's overall rank, indicating that the CPU marginally constrains the system's ceiling in this game.
The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for this ranking. The RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37648 is nearly identical to the Tesla P4 (37628, +0.1%) and RX Vega 56 (37507, +0.4%), yet the RTX 4070 offers more modern feature support. The 1.3% deficit against the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) is negligible in real-world gaming, while the 1.3% lead over the Radeon PRO W6400 (37157) confirms the 4070's position in the upper mid-range tier.
The CPU's rank of 904 in the combo list aligns with its 79th percentile standing among all CPUs. The Ryzen 7 5700G's average benchmark score of 27051 puts it in a tight cluster with the Core i9-9900K (27097, -0.2%), Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936, +0.4%), Core i5-14400T (27166, -0.4%), and Core i7-1370P (26900, +0.6%). This grouping suggests that the 5700G delivers performance comparable to several newer and older high-end parts, making it a competent partner for the RTX 4070 in this title.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G provides 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The CPU's base clock of 3.80 GHz boosts to 4.60 GHz, and it features 16 MB of L3 cache alongside 512 KB of L2 cache per core. This configuration delivers strong multi-threaded performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 and PassMark multithread score of 24419.
For Control, the CPU's role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and handle game logic. The single-thread performance, measured at 899 in 3DMark single-thread and 1494 in Cinebench R23 single-core, proves adequate for the game's engine. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1758 and 4-thread score of 3389 demonstrate that the CPU scales well with the limited thread counts typical of game workloads. The 8-thread score of 5648 and max-thread score of 6627 indicate that additional cores do not provide diminishing returns until beyond 8 threads.
The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s from dual-channel DDR4 support is sufficient for this game, as the measured FPS data shows no memory-related bottleneck. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 999 and floating-point math score of 51296 suggest robust computational ability for physics calculations, which Control uses extensively for destructible environments. The 65W TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for potential overclocking headroom, though the stock configuration already achieves the measured results.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data spans three resolutions and four quality settings, providing a comprehensive view of the combo's capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest performance: Low settings produce 193 FPS average, Medium reaches 137 FPS with a minimum of 116 FPS and maximum of 157 FPS, High delivers 122 FPS, and Ultra maintains 106 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 45% reduction in frame rate, which is typical for a GPU-bound title.
At 2560x1440, the performance drops proportionally: Low averages 146 FPS, Medium averages 104 FPS with a range of 88-119 FPS, High averages 92 FPS, and Ultra averages 80 FPS. The 1440p results show a similar 45% reduction from Low to Ultra, confirming that the GPU remains the limiting factor. The Medium preset's minimum of 88 FPS indicates that even demanding scenes stay comfortably above 60 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to struggle with the highest quality settings: Low averages 98 FPS, Medium averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and maximum of 80 FPS, High averages 62 FPS, and Ultra drops to 54 FPS. The 4K Medium result is particularly notable because it provides the only reported minimum frame rate above 55 FPS at this resolution, suggesting that High and Ultra may experience more pronounced dips. The 4K Low result of 98 FPS shows that the GPU has significant headroom when visual quality is reduced, but the resolution's pixel count ultimately limits the highest settings.
Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently provides the best balance of performance and visual quality, with the 1080p and 1440p results showing minimum frame rates that stay well above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p and 1440p remains playable, but the 4K Ultra result falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The data overall demonstrates that this combo excels at 1080p and 1440p across all settings, while 4K requires Medium or High settings for acceptable performance.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 98.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 70.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 146.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 104.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 80.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 193.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 137.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 122.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 106.0 |
Control with Ryzen 7 5700G + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700G + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.