Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

The measured FPS data for this combination in Pc Building Simulator reveals a system that scales predictably across resolutions, with the Ryzen 7 5700 and RX 7700 pairing producing a notable bottleneck shift as pixel count rises. At 1080p, the system delivers extremely high frame rates that suggest CPU involvement; at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, evidenced by the dramatic performance drop between Low and Ultra settings. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes them against the component specifications, and explains what the data implies for users of this simulation title.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K tells a clear story about where the performance ceiling sits in Pc Building Simulator. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces 282 FPS, which drops to 178 FPS at 1440p and then to 93 FPS at 4K. That represents a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings. The Medium preset shows a similar pattern: 200 FPS at 1080p, 126 FPS at 1440p, and 66 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Medium is a 37% drop, while moving from 1440p to 4K costs another 48%. This non-linear decline indicates that the GPU is being progressively loaded more heavily as resolution increases.

Looking at High settings, the numbers are 141 FPS at 1080p, 89 FPS at 1440p, and 47 FPS at 4K. The 1440p to 4K drop is 47%, nearly identical to the Medium preset's drop. Ultra settings show 134 FPS at 1080p, 85 FPS at 1440p, and 44 FPS at 4K. The consistency of these percentage drops across presets suggests a uniform GPU-bound scaling behavior at higher resolutions. The RX 7700's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth appears sufficient for this game, as the FPS declines track with raw pixel throughput rather than memory capacity limits.

The 1080p results are particularly revealing. At Low settings, 282 FPS versus 93 FPS at 4K indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU well at lower resolution. The Ryzen 7 5700's 8 cores and 16 threads, with boost clock of 4.60 GHz, provide enough single-thread performance to avoid bottlenecking at these frame rates. However, the gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p — 282 FPS versus 134 FPS — shows that the GPU still has headroom at Low but becomes more involved as settings increase. At 4K, the Low to Ultra spread narrows to 93 FPS versus 44 FPS, meaning the GPU is now the dominant constraint regardless of preset.

Data from the measured FPS rows indicates that the 1440p resolution is the sweet spot for this combination in Pc Building Simulator. Medium settings at 1440p produce 126 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while High settings at 89 FPS remain comfortable. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at High settings costs 37% performance, but the visual fidelity gain from the extra pixels likely justifies this trade-off. At 4K, even Medium settings only achieve 66 FPS, making this resolution viable only for users who prioritize resolution over frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 282, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This drops to 200 FPS at Medium and 141 FPS at High settings for the same resolution.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 93 on Low settings to 44 on Ultra settings, with Medium producing 66 FPS and High producing 47 FPS. Only the Low preset stays comfortably above 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 282 FPS result suggests CPU headroom, but at 4K, the severe drop across all presets points to the RX 7700 as the primary constraint. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with a 4.60 GHz boost clock are sufficient for this simulation title.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination?

A: 2560x1440 appears optimal, with Medium settings producing 126 FPS and High settings producing 89 FPS. This resolution balances visual quality with frame rates that exceed typical display refresh rates, unlike 4K where even Medium settings only reach 66 FPS.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: This combination ranks 1348 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 55th percentile. The GPU's percentile rank of 58 against all GPUs is slightly higher than the combo's overall rank.

Q: Are there any settings where the system exceeds 240 FPS?

A: Yes, only at 1920x1080 with Low settings does the system reach 282 FPS, which is above the 240 FPS threshold. At 1080p Medium, the 200 FPS average falls short of that mark, and at 1440p Low, the 178 FPS average is well below it.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 offers the most balanced experience. The 126 FPS average with a minimum of 107 FPS and maximum of 145 FPS provides a smooth frame time distribution that should satisfy most displays. This combination delivers 41% more performance than High settings at the same resolution, while the visual differences between Medium and High in a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator are likely subtle given the game's focus on system building interfaces rather than fast-paced action.

For users with 1080p displays, High settings at 141 FPS is the recommended choice. This preset still exceeds 120 FPS, and the jump to Ultra only adds 134 FPS average, which is actually 5% lower than High — an anomaly in the data that suggests Ultra settings may introduce effects that burden the GPU without proportional visual benefit. The measured High result of 141 FPS versus Ultra's 134 FPS at 1080p indicates that High is the more efficient preset for this resolution.

At 4K, the recommendation changes dramatically. Medium settings produce 66 FPS with a min of 56 FPS, which is playable but close to the edge of smoothness. Low settings at 93 FPS are the only 4K preset that offers comfortable headroom above 60 FPS. Given that this is a simulation game where precision clicks matter more than reaction time, the Medium preset's 66 FPS average is acceptable, but users seeking consistent frame pacing should consider Low at 4K or drop to 1440p with High settings.

The data reveals an interesting pattern: Ultra settings never provide the highest FPS at any resolution. At 1080p, Ultra's 134 FPS trails High's 141 FPS; at 1440p, Ultra's 85 FPS is close to High's 89 FPS; at 4K, Ultra's 44 FPS is below High's 47 FPS. This suggests that the Ultra preset in Pc Building Simulator may include settings that this GPU configuration cannot fully utilize efficiently, making High the superior choice for maximum frame rate without sacrificing visual quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS dataset for this combination covers three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 282 FPS average, Medium achieves 200 FPS with a minimum of 170 and maximum of 230, High achieves 141 FPS, and Ultra achieves 134 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 148 FPS, demonstrating significant GPU sensitivity to settings at this resolution. The Medium preset's min/max range of 170-230 FPS indicates consistent frame delivery without major stuttering.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops are substantial. Low settings produce 178 FPS, which is a 37% reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce 126 FPS with a range of 107 to 145 FPS, representing a 37% drop from the 1080p Medium result as well. High settings at 89 FPS and Ultra at 85 FPS show a narrower gap of only 4 FPS, suggesting that at 1440p, the GPU is approaching a performance plateau where additional settings have diminishing impact.

At 3840x2160, the numbers become more constrained. Low settings achieve 93 FPS, which is 48% lower than the 1440p Low result. Medium settings produce 66 FPS with a range of 56 to 76 FPS, High produces 47 FPS, and Ultra produces 44 FPS. The min/max range at 4K Medium is 20 FPS, which is tighter in absolute terms than the 38 FPS range at 1440p Medium, but the lower average makes the variance more noticeable in practice. The 4K results show that only Low settings maintain a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

Comparing presets across resolutions reveals consistent scaling ratios. The Medium to Low ratio at 1080p is 0.71 (200/282), at 1440p it is 0.71 (126/178), and at 4K it is 0.71 (66/93). This exact consistency across resolutions is notable and suggests that the Medium preset imposes a fixed performance penalty relative to Low, regardless of resolution. Similarly, the Ultra to Low ratio at 1080p is 0.48 (134/282), at 1440p it is 0.48 (85/178), and at 4K it is 0.47 (44/93), showing a remarkably stable relationship.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 plays a central role in the measured FPS results, particularly at higher resolutions where its specifications become the determining factor. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. For Pc Building Simulator, which likely involves loading textures for PC components and workshop environments, this memory configuration is more than adequate. The 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s, which translates into the raw throughput needed for the resolution scaling observed in the data.

The GPU's clock behavior — base 1900 MHz, game 2041 MHz, and boost 2459 MHz — explains why the performance gaps between presets are consistent across resolutions. The boost clock of 2459 MHz is the ceiling that the GPU can reach under load, and the measured FPS data suggests that Pc Building Simulator is able to push the GPU to these frequencies at all presets. The FP32 compute of 25.18 TFLOPS is substantial for a simulation game that may not heavily utilize compute shaders, but it ensures headroom for any physics or lighting calculations.

The RX 7700's 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852, places it in the mid-range tier. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon RX 9060 (deltaPct -1), AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (deltaPct 1.1), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (deltaPct -1.7). These close margins — all within 1.7% of the RX 7700's average score — show that this GPU sits in a highly competitive performance band. The 4K results in Pc Building Simulator reflect this positioning: the GPU can handle 4K at Low settings but struggles at higher presets, consistent with a mid-range card rather than a flagship.

The 16 GB memory capacity is worth noting for a 2025 release GPU, as it ensures that memory capacity will not be a bottleneck for this game at any resolution. The measured data supports this, as the FPS drops at 4K track with computational load rather than memory pressure. The 256-bit bus width and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture streaming in a game that renders detailed PC components, but the GPU's compute capabilities are what ultimately limit Ultra preset performance at 4K.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 provides the processing foundation for this combination, and its specifications help explain the high frame rates at 1080p. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 3 architecture, this CPU offers strong multithreaded performance that is beneficial for a simulation game that must track numerous system states. The base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz deliver single-thread performance that is adequate for the game's logic and UI rendering. The 16 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth on dual-channel DDR4 support smooth data flow for game assets.

The CPU's benchmark scores provide context for its role in the measured FPS. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 20655 and single-core score of 2916 indicate balanced performance that should not bottleneck the RX 7700 in most scenarios. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6628 and single-thread score of 901 show similar characteristics. The PassMark multithread score of 24303 and single-thread score of 3296 further confirm this CPU's capability to handle both multithreaded workloads and latency-sensitive single-thread tasks.

The CPU's 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25517, places it above the GPU's relative standing. Its nearest rivals — Intel Xeon D-2752TER (deltaPct -0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (deltaPct -0.1), and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (deltaPct 0.3) — all score within 0.3% of the 5700. This tight clustering indicates that the 5700's performance is well-established in its segment.

In Pc Building Simulator specifically, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the 282 FPS result suggests that the CPU is capable of driving frame rates well beyond what most displays can show. At 1080p Medium, the 200 FPS result, while lower, still indicates CPU headroom. The fact that Ultra at 1080p (134 FPS) is lower than High (141 FPS) is unusual and may point to CPU involvement in specific Ultra settings, though the exact cause cannot be determined from the FPS data alone. At 1440p and 4K, the CPU's contribution becomes less critical as the GPU takes over as the limiting factor.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks 1348 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 55th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking is notable because the GPU alone sits at the 58th percentile against all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 78th percentile against all CPUs. The combo's rank being lower than both individual components' percentiles suggests that the pairing may not be perfectly optimized for this specific game, or that other combinations in the database achieve better results through different balance points.

The rank of 1348 out of 3002 means that approximately 1654 tested combos performed worse than this configuration, while 1347 performed better. This middle-of-the-pack positioning is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows strong 1080p performance but only adequate 4K performance. The rank of 1348 is not a simple average of the CPU and GPU percentiles (which would be around 68), indicating that the game's performance characteristics favor certain hardware combinations over others.

Comparing this combo's rank to the individual component ranks reveals an interesting discrepancy. The GPU's 58th percentile and CPU's 78th percentile would suggest a combo rank in the upper 50th to lower 60th percentile, but the actual rank is 55th. This 3-23 percentage point gap implies that Pc Building Simulator may not fully utilize the CPU's strengths or the GPU's capabilities in equal measure. The game's simulation nature might place unusual demands on the CPU that the 5700 handles well, but the GPU's mid-range positioning at 4K drags the overall combo ranking down.

The combo's rank of 1348 out of 3002 also provides context for the measured FPS expectations. Users with this configuration should expect performance that is better than roughly 55% of all tested systems, which is a reasonable outcome for a mid-range GPU paired with a strong CPU. The data shows that this combo is not at the top of the rankings, but it is also far from the bottom. For a game like Pc Building Simulator that is not typically considered a demanding AAA title, this rank indicates that the system is well-suited for the game's requirements, particularly at 1080p and 1440p resolutions where the measured FPS numbers are strong.