Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that stresses system configuration more than raw graphical fidelity, and the measured frame rates for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 reflect that dynamic. The data shows a combo that scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the most dramatic shifts occurring when moving between 1080p and 4K, revealing a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher workloads.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is steep across every settings preset, which points directly at the Radeon RX 7600 as the limiting component. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 229.7 at 1080p to 144.8 at 1440p, then to 77.8 at 4K. That is a 66.1% reduction from 1080p to 4K, a massive gap that only makes sense if the GPU is saturated by pixel throughput. The story is similar at High settings, where the average drops from 113.4 at 1080p to 74.8 at 1440p and then to 35.9 at 4K — a 68.3% decline. The scaling is not linear, and the 1440p-to-4K jump is consistently larger than the 1080p-to-1440p step, which indicates the RX 7600’s memory bandwidth and shading resources are exhausted as resolution climbs.

The 4K numbers are telling. At Ultra, the average is 38.6 FPS, which is barely playable, while High sits at 35.9 FPS. Interestingly, Ultra is actually slightly faster than High at 4K, a statistical anomaly that suggests the game’s preset differences are minor at this resolution. At 1440p, the scaling is more forgiving: Low delivers 144.8 FPS, Medium 98.7 FPS, and High 74.8 FPS, with Ultra trailing at 67 FPS. The 1080p results are where this combo shines — Low hits 229.7 FPS, Medium 161.8 FPS, and both High and Ultra remain above 110 FPS. The pattern is clear: the CPU has enough headroom at 1080p to push the GPU to its limits, but beyond that, resolution scaling dominates.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested CPU-GPU combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this pairing ranks 1185 out of 1769 combos. That places it in the lower third of the field, which is a stark contrast to the raw benchmark scores of the individual components. The Ryzen 5 5600G sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, and the RX 7600 is at the 63rd percentile among GPUs, yet the combination ranks poorly in this specific game. The data suggests that Pc Building Simulator is not particularly demanding on either component, so the ranking reflects a system that is overkill for the title’s needs, or that the game’s engine does not scale well with this hardware.

The nearest rival scores for the CPU show how close the field is: the Ryzen 5 5600G averages 19983, with the Intel Core i7-11600H at 19949 (0.2% behind) and the Intel Core i7-11800H at 20024 (0.2% ahead). The GPU’s rivals are similarly tight, with the RX 7600 at 20258, the RX 7600 XT at 20146 (0.6% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (1.3% ahead). These deltas are tiny, yet the combo rank of 1185 out of 1769 indicates that the game’s performance profile does not reward these components proportionally. The low rank is likely due to the simulation genre’s light GPU load, meaning the RX 7600’s strengths are underutilized.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock reaches 2655 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). These specifications are moderate for a modern GPU, and the data shows they are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but fall short at 4K. The 8 GB VRAM is a key factor — at 4K, the High preset averages 35.9 FPS, which is below the 38.6 FPS seen at Ultra, suggesting that memory capacity or bandwidth is causing bottlenecks that preset tweaks cannot overcome.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its midrange positioning: it scores 16634 in Passmark G3D and 8790 in Passmark GPU Compute, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310. The average benchmark score is 20258, placing it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU’s role is primarily to handle the 3D rendering of PC components and the workshop environment, which is not graphically intense. The 4K results show the GPU is the bottleneck, but the 1080p results show it has plenty of headroom — the 229.7 FPS at Low settings indicates the game is not heavily taxing the RX 7600’s 2048 shading units or 64 ROPs.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 229.7 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates the CPU is not limiting. Medium drops to 161.8 FPS, then High at 113.4 FPS, and Ultra at 110.2 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is just 3.2 FPS, suggesting that Ultra’s additional effects are minor at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the averages are 144.8 FPS for Low, 98.7 FPS for Medium, 74.8 FPS for High, and 67 FPS for Ultra. The 1440p results show a more pronounced drop from Low to Medium (46.1 FPS difference) compared to the 1080p drop (67.9 FPS), which indicates the GPU is starting to feel the load. At 3840x2160, the averages fall to 77.8 FPS for Low, 52.4 FPS for Medium, 35.9 FPS for High, and 38.6 FPS for Ultra. The 4K Low result is the only playable option, and even that is below the 1440p High result.

The data shows that the 1080p Medium setting (161.8 FPS) outperforms the 1440p Low setting (144.8 FPS), which is expected, but the 1080p Ultra (110.2 FPS) is nearly identical to the 1440p Medium (98.7 FPS) — a 11.5 FPS difference. This suggests that the game’s visual quality settings have a larger impact on FPS than resolution scaling in the mid-range. The 4K High result of 35.9 FPS is the lowest measured, and it is notably worse than the 4K Ultra result of 38.6 FPS, which is unusual and may indicate a driver or game optimization quirk rather than a consistent trend.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, the measured data points to 1920x1080 with Medium or High settings as the sweet spot. Medium delivers 161.8 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while High offers 113.4 FPS, still comfortably playable. Ultra at 1080p provides 110.2 FPS, but the 3.2 FPS gain over High is negligible, so High is the better choice for visual fidelity without a performance penalty. At 2560x1440, Low is the only option that guarantees a high refresh rate experience at 144.8 FPS, but Medium at 98.7 FPS is still solid for most users. The 1440p High setting (74.8 FPS) is borderline, and Ultra (67 FPS) is best avoided if frame pacing is a concern.

At 3840x2160, the data strongly advises against High or Ultra settings, as both hover below 40 FPS. Low is the only viable preset at 4K, with 77.8 FPS, but that sacrifices visual quality significantly. Given that the combo ranks 1185 out of 1769 for this game, the hardware is not optimized for 4K in this title. The most balanced recommendation is 1080p High, which offers 113.4 FPS while retaining enough detail for a simulation game where readability of components matters. For users with a 144 Hz monitor, 1080p Medium at 161.8 FPS is the best match, as it keeps the frame rate above the refresh rate without the diminishing returns of Low settings.