Pc Building Simulator

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 produces a highly capable combination for Pc Building Simulator, with the data showing the GPU as the primary performance driver at higher resolutions while the CPU holds its own at 1080p. Benchmark results indicate this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and smooth 1440p play, with 4K remaining possible but requiring settings adjustments.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a classic GPU-bound scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p High settings, the combo delivers 141 FPS, but this drops to 89 FPS at 1440p and then to 47 FPS at 4K. This represents a 37% performance loss when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 47% drop when stepping up to 4K. The scaling curve is steep, indicating that the RX 7700’s rendering workload grows substantially with pixel count, as expected for a simulation title that relies heavily on scene complexity rather than raw geometry.

The pattern becomes more telling when examining the Low settings row. At 1080p Low, the system pushes 267 FPS, which falls to 178 FPS at 1440p and 93 FPS at 4K. The relative drops here are similar in percentage to the High settings row, confirming that resolution scaling is consistent regardless of graphical fidelity. This consistency points to the GPU being the limiting component across all tested configurations — the CPU is not creating a bottleneck that would flatten the scaling curve at higher resolutions.

What is particularly revealing is the gap between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (267 FPS) and Ultra (134 FPS) is exactly 2x, while at 4K, Low produces 93 FPS and Ultra falls to 44 FPS, again almost exactly 2x. This doubling pattern suggests that Pc Building Simulator’s rendering pipeline scales linearly with settings complexity, and the RX 7700’s compute resources are being fully utilized at every step. The limiting factor at 4K is clearly the GPU’s raw throughput, not any CPU constraint.

GPU Role

The RX 7700 brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. For a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which manages numerous on-screen objects and UI elements, this memory capacity is generous and unlikely to be a constraint at any tested resolution. The 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units provide ample compute for the game’s rendering demands, and the 96 ROPs handle pixel output efficiently.

Clock speeds show a base of 1900 MHz with a boost of 2459 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz. The boost behavior matters here because the measured FPS at Medium settings shows tight frame pacing: at 1440p Medium, the minimum FPS is 107 and maximum is 145, yielding an average of 126 FPS. This 38 FPS spread indicates the GPU is maintaining consistent clock frequencies under sustained load, without significant thermal or power throttling. The 200W TDP and dual-slot cooler design suggest the card can sustain these clocks during extended sessions.

The GPU’s benchmark profile places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 370X, scores nearly identically at 15862, a delta of only -0.1%. This means the RX 7700’s performance in synthetic tests is essentially equivalent to that much older card, despite the architectural advantages of RDNA 3.0. However, in Pc Building Simulator specifically, the measured FPS shows the GPU performing well above what its percentile ranking might suggest, indicating the game is well-optimized for this architecture.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 4600G contributes 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, with base and boost clocks of 3.70 GHz and 4.20 GHz respectively. The 8 MB shared L3 cache is modest by modern standards, but Pc Building Simulator’s simulation logic does not appear to be cache-sensitive based on the measured results. The CPU’s 65W TDP and integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are irrelevant for this discrete GPU configuration, but the processor’s overall compute capability is sufficient to feed the RX 7700.

Looking at the CPU’s synthetic benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13593 and single-core score of 1919 indicate balanced performance. The Geekbench multicore result of 6637 and single-core of 1460 further confirm this. The Passmark multithread score of 15992 places the CPU in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17507. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE at 17482 (0.1% delta) and the Intel Core 7 150U at 17395 (0.6% delta), showing this CPU sits in a tightly competitive mid-range segment.

The critical question is whether the CPU limits FPS at lower resolutions. The data suggests it does not. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 267 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that would expose any CPU bottleneck. The fact that the system can produce this many frames indicates the 4600G’s single-thread performance is adequate for the game’s simulation loop. The 3DMark single-thread score of 726 and 2-thread score of 1430 reinforce that the CPU can handle the game’s primary thread without becoming the limiting factor, even at frame rates above 200 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong results across all settings. Low settings produce 267 FPS average, which is exceptionally high and indicates the game is not demanding at minimal fidelity. Medium settings drop to 200 FPS average with a minimum of 170 and maximum of 230 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery. High settings yield 141 FPS, while Ultra reduces performance to 134 FPS. The relatively small gap between High and Ultra (141 vs 134 FPS) suggests diminishing returns from the highest preset, as the extra visual features do not heavily tax the GPU.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains very playable. Low settings still produce 178 FPS, which is excellent for competitive or smooth gameplay. Medium settings average 126 FPS with a narrow 107-145 FPS range, indicating stable performance without significant frame drops. High settings deliver 89 FPS, and Ultra falls to 85 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra at 1440p is nearly identical to the 1080p gap, reinforcing that the Ultra preset adds minimal overhead over High.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits. Low settings produce 93 FPS, which is still playable, but Medium drops to 66 FPS with a 56-76 FPS range. High settings yield 47 FPS, and Ultra falls to 44 FPS. These numbers suggest that 4K gaming is possible but requires Medium or Low settings to maintain smooth frame rates. The 4K Medium results show a 20 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, which is proportionally larger than at lower resolutions, indicating more variable frame pacing under heavier GPU load.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 4600G and RX 7700 ranks 1819 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 49th percentile of all pairings. This mid-pack ranking is notable given the individual components’ percentiles: the CPU sits in the 71st percentile while the GPU is in the 58th percentile. The combined ranking being lower than either component suggests that this pairing does not extract the maximum potential from both parts in this specific game, likely because the RX 7700’s performance is not fully utilized at the CPU’s preferred resolution.

The ranking becomes more meaningful when considering the GPU’s nearest rivals. The RX 7700’s average benchmark score of 15852 is nearly identical to the Radeon R9 370X (15862, -0.1% delta) and the Radeon Pro W5500 (15679, 1.1% delta). However, those rival cards would likely pair with different CPUs in real systems, and the measured FPS here shows the 4600G is not holding back the RX 7700. The combo’s ranking of 1819 out of 3723 indicates that while this is not a top-tier configuration, it sits comfortably in the upper half of all possible pairings.

Settings Recommendations

For 1920x1080 displays, the Ultra preset is the clear choice. The measured 134 FPS average is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and the drop from High (141 FPS) is only 5%. There is no reason to sacrifice visual quality at this resolution when the system maintains high frame rates even on the most demanding preset.

For 2560x1440, High settings provide the best balance. The 89 FPS average is smooth, and the step up to Ultra (85 FPS) offers minimal visual benefit for a 4 FPS loss. Medium settings (126 FPS) are available for users who prefer higher refresh rates, but the measured data shows High delivers a comfortable experience without pushing the GPU to its limits. The tight frame pacing at Medium (107-145 FPS) suggests that even the lower settings are stable, but High is recommended for the best visual fidelity per frame.

For 3840x2160, the data clearly points to Medium settings as the optimal choice. At 66 FPS average, this preset crosses the 60 FPS threshold for playable performance, while High (47 FPS) and Ultra (44 FPS) fall below it. Low settings (93 FPS) provide smoother performance but sacrifice too much visual detail for a simulation game where reading on-screen information is important. The Medium preset’s 56-76 FPS range is acceptable, though users sensitive to frame drops may prefer Low settings for competitive play. Overall, this combo is best utilized at 1080p Ultra or 1440p High, with 4K reserved for users who prioritize resolution over visual effects.