Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
48
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 48 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 16 19 26 35
1440p QHD 31 36 50 71
1080p Full HD 53 55 80 108

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 35
3840x2160 Medium 26
3840x2160 High 19
3840x2160 Ultra 16
2560x1440 Low 71
2560x1440 Medium 50
2560x1440 High 36
2560x1440 Ultra 31
1920x1080 Low 108
1920x1080 Medium 80
1920x1080 High 55
1920x1080 Ultra 53

Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 570, In-Depth Analysis

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title focused on system assembly and troubleshooting, shows a clear performance hierarchy for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 570. The measured data indicates that this combination is capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p with adjusted settings, but struggles significantly at higher resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS results, the role of each component, and provides actionable settings recommendations based strictly on the provided data.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this system in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Based on the measured FPS data, the only combination that exceeds 100 FPS is 1920x1080 with Low settings, achieving an average of 107.9 FPS. For a balance of visual quality and performance, 1920x1080 at Medium settings delivers 80.2 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K resolution?

A: Performance at 3840x2160 is poor across all settings. The highest average FPS at this resolution is 34.9 FPS on Low settings. At High settings, the average drops to 19.3 FPS, and at Ultra it falls to 16.1 FPS, making the game effectively unplayable at 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at higher resolutions?

A: The data strongly suggests the GPU is the limiting factor. As resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 on Low settings, the average FPS drops from 107.9 to 34.9, a massive decline that indicates the graphics card is struggling to render the increased pixel count.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the difference is substantial. The average FPS on Low settings is 70.7, while on Ultra settings it drops to 30.5. This represents a performance penalty of over half the frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 2600 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600 has an average benchmark score of 19616. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-1345U, scores 19691, which is a 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U scores 19508, a 0.6% difference, showing the CPU is very competitive with these parts.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Radeon RX 570 has a percentile rank of 74 among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 30158 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which scores 30109 and is just 0.2% higher.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of what settings are viable for this hardware combination. At 1920x1080, the system has headroom to operate at higher presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 107.9 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate displays, but the visual fidelity is minimal. The Medium preset, with an average of 80.2 FPS, offers a much better visual experience while still maintaining a frame rate well above 60 FPS. This makes Medium at 1080p the optimal balance for most users.

Moving to the High preset at 1080p yields an average of 55 FPS, which is playable but misses the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset at 1080p is the lowest performer of the group, with an average of 52.6 FPS. For a smoother experience at higher visual quality, users could consider the High preset, but the data shows that Medium is the sweet spot for consistent performance. At 2560x1440, the situation changes. The Low preset is the only one that provides a comfortable frame rate, averaging 70.7 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 50.1 FPS, and High and Ultra fall to 35.9 FPS and 30.5 FPS respectively. Therefore, for a playable experience at 1440p, the Low preset is the recommended choice.

At 3840x2160, no preset is viable for smooth gameplay. The best result is 34.9 FPS on Low, which is below the standard 60 FPS target and will feel sluggish. All other presets at 4K fall below 30 FPS, making the game unplayable. The recommendation is to avoid 4K entirely with this configuration. The data indicates that the best experience is achieved at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset, which provides a high frame rate without sacrificing the visual quality of the simulation. For users who prioritize raw FPS, the Low preset at 1080p is the only option that breaks the 100 FPS barrier.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data across the three resolutions reveals a distinct pattern of GPU-bound performance. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates strong performance, with the Low preset hitting an average of 107.9 FPS. This is a clear indication that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data at this resolution. However, as the resolution increases, the frame rates plummet. At 2560x1440, the Low preset average drops to 70.7 FPS, a decrease of 34.5% from the 1080p result.

The scaling continues at 3840x2160, where the Low preset average falls to 34.9 FPS. This represents a 67.7% drop in performance from 1080p to 4K at the same settings. This steep decline is characteristic of a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The workload at higher resolutions increases the number of pixels the Radeon RX 570 must process, and its 4 GB of GDDR5 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates.

The pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For example, at High settings, the average FPS goes from 55 at 1080p to 35.9 at 1440p, and finally to 19.3 at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 34.7% drop, and from 1440p to 4K shows a 46.2% drop. This indicates that the GPU is not just a limiting factor at 4K, but begins to struggle significantly at 1440p. The data suggests that the CPU, a Ryzen 5 2600 with 6 cores and 12 threads, has ample headroom. The FPS is being dictated almost entirely by the graphics card's rendering capabilities, as evidenced by the large frame rate changes with resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system shows a wide range of performance depending on the preset. The Low preset averages 107.9 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this configuration. The Medium preset averages 80.2 FPS, offering a significant improvement in visual quality with a still-excellent frame rate. The High preset averages 55 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 52.6 FPS. This shows a clear performance hierarchy where each step up in settings costs a noticeable amount of performance.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop considerably. The Low preset is the only option that remains above the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 70.7 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 50.1 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The High preset averages 35.9 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 30.5 FPS. This resolution presents a challenge for the Radeon RX 570, as even the Medium preset struggles to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly overmatched. The Low preset averages 34.9 FPS, which is below the playability threshold. The Medium preset averages 26.4 FPS, and the High preset averages 19.3 FPS. The Ultra preset produces the worst result, with an average of 16.1 FPS. None of these results are suitable for a good gaming experience. The data shows a consistent pattern: the system is well-suited for 1080p, acceptable at 1440p with Low settings, and unsuitable for 4K.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 570 is the primary component influencing the game's performance at higher resolutions. It is built on the GCN 4.0 architecture with a Polaris 20 chip. The GPU has a base clock of 1168 MHz and a boost clock of 1244 MHz. It is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. These specifications, while adequate for 1080p, are insufficient for the demands of 1440p and 4K gaming.

The GPU's percentile rank of 74 shows it is a mid-range part, and its average benchmark score of 30158 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which scores 30109. However, the RTX 5060 is a much newer product, highlighting the RX 570's age. The measured FPS data confirms this. The GPU's 5.095 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32 ROPs are simply not enough to handle the pixel fill rate required at 4K, leading to the low frame rates observed.

The memory configuration is also a limiting factor. With only 4 GB of VRAM, the card may run into capacity issues at higher resolutions and settings, though the measured FPS data does not specify this. The 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth is a bottleneck when moving from 1080p to 1440p, as the average FPS on Low settings drops by 34.5%. This indicates that the GPU is the main reason the system cannot achieve high frame rates at resolutions above 1080p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 provides the processing power for this system. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. This Zen architecture CPU has a 16 MB shared L3 cache. With a TDP of 65 W, it is an efficient part. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19616 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, showing it is a capable processor.

In the context of Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU. The FPS scaling with resolution strongly suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck. At 1080p, the CPU is easily able to push frame rates above 100 FPS on Low settings. Even at 4K, the CPU is likely not the limiting factor, as the frame rates are dictated by the GPU's rendering speed. The Ryzen 5 2600's performance is competitive with its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-11600KF, which is only 0.6% faster in average benchmark score.

The CPU's 12 threads are more than sufficient for a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which may have significant processing demands for game logic and component simulation. However, the data shows that changing the resolution has a massive impact on FPS, which is a sign of a GPU bottleneck. For example, the drop from 107.9 FPS at 1080p Low to 34.9 FPS at 4K Low is far too large to be caused by the CPU. This indicates that the Ryzen 5 2600 is providing a solid foundation, but the Radeon RX 570 is the component that determines the playable settings and resolutions for this game.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 3900 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 570

VRAM 4 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1244 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 570 in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 34.9
3840x2160 Medium 26.4
3840x2160 High 19.3
3840x2160 Ultra 16.1
2560x1440 Low 70.7
2560x1440 Medium 50.1
2560x1440 High 35.9
2560x1440 Ultra 30.5
1920x1080 Low 107.9
1920x1080 Medium 80.2
1920x1080 High 55.0
1920x1080 Ultra 52.6

Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RX 570 + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RX 570

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.