Palworld
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 182 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 64 | 85 | 110 | 136 |
| 1440p QHD | 115 | 153 | 199 | 246 |
| 1080p Full HD | 176 | 233 | 301 | 367 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld, the survival crafting phenomenon, places unique demands on hardware, and the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 presents a compelling mobile platform. The measured data reveals a configuration that is highly capable at mainstream resolutions but encounters significant challenges at the extreme high end. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results across different resolutions and settings, contextualizing the performance against the established hardware hierarchy.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, this combo achieves an average of 97 FPS. This indicates a solid, playable experience for the majority of monitors, with the headroom to suggest that smoother 120Hz+ displays might be accessible at slightly lower settings.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H has an average benchmark score of 35670. This places it virtually neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, which scores 35719, a difference of only -0.1%. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (score 35909) by just -0.7%, indicating they are in the same performance tier.
Q: What is the best performance leap from 1080p to 1440p?
A: The data shows a significant drop when moving from 1080p to 1440p. For instance, at Low settings, the average FPS falls from 156 at 1080p to 103 at 1440p, a reduction of 53 FPS. This suggests that the resolution increase demands substantially more from the GPU.
Q: Is the RTX 5060's performance more aligned with a discrete desktop GPU or an integrated one?
A: The RTX 5060's average benchmark score is 26331. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 860M, an integrated graphics solution, with a score of 26401, showing a negligible -0.3% difference. This indicates that in raw compute terms, the mobile RTX 5060 is performing at a level comparable to a high-end integrated GPU, though its dedicated VRAM and drivers may offer different real-world advantages.
Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded in this dataset?
A: The peak average FPS is 156, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only setting in the data that breaks the 150 FPS barrier, highlighting how lowering graphical fidelity can unlock very high refresh rates for competitive play or fast-paced exploration.
Q: Where does this specific CPU/GPU combination rank among all tested combos in Palworld?
A: For Palworld specifically, this combination ranks 1922 out of 2944 tested combos. This places it in the 65th percentile of all systems tested, meaning roughly a third of tested configurations perform better in this particular game.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the primary driver of visual fidelity in this configuration. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz. In the context of Palworld, a game with expansive voxel-based worlds and numerous dynamic objects, this memory bandwidth and clock speed configuration is crucial for streaming textures and geometry.
The benchmark results show a clear correlation between GPU load and frame rate. At 4K (3840x2160), the GPU is pushed to its limits, struggling to maintain smooth gameplay on higher presets. The average FPS at 4K High is 35, which dips to 27 at Ultra. This indicates a hard bottleneck at the GPU level, where the 8 GB of VRAM may also be a limiting factor given the high-resolution textures. The difference between 4K Low (57 FPS) and 4K High (35 FPS) is a substantial 22 FPS, showcasing how sensitive this GPU is to shader and texture complexity at this extreme resolution.
Synthetic benchmarks further define the GPU's capabilities. The RTX 5060 scores 20891 in Passmark G3D, and its percentile ranking against all GPUs is 72. This suggests it is a solidly mid-to-upper-tier performer. Its nearest rivals in synthetic tests, like the AMD Radeon 860M, are surprisingly close, but the real-world gaming data in Palworld shows the RTX 5060's dedicated nature provides a substantial advantage, particularly at 1440p and above where the performance gap widens compared to integrated solutions.
Resolution Scaling
The relationship between resolution and performance is a critical indicator of system balance. The data for Palworld shows a classic pattern of GPU-bound scaling. As resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, the number of pixels quadruples, placing a significantly higher load on the RTX 5060.
At Low settings, the progression is telling: 156 FPS at 1080p drops to 103 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 57 FPS at 4K. This represents a 63% performance reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not perfectly linear due to overheads, but it clearly demonstrates that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU has less impact as resolution increases because the GPU takes longer to render each frame, giving the processor more time to prepare the next one.
This pattern suggests that for Palworld, this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At these resolutions, the GPU can maintain high frame rates, allowing the Core Ultra 9 185H's strong single-threaded performance to shine. At 4K, however, the GPU's limitations become the defining factor, and even the powerful CPU cannot compensate for the sheer rendering workload placed on the RTX 5060.
Measured FPS Breakdown
Here is the detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for every resolution and settings combination in the dataset:
- 3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 57 FPS
- Medium: 46 FPS (min 39, max 53)
- High: 35 FPS
- Ultra: 27 FPS
- 2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 103 FPS
- Medium: 83 FPS (min 71, max 96)
- High: 64 FPS
- Ultra: 48 FPS
- 1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 156 FPS
- Medium: 126 FPS (min 107, max 145)
- High: 97 FPS
- Ultra: 74 FPS
The 1080p results show a comprehensive performance envelope. The jump from Ultra (74 FPS) to Low (156 FPS) is a massive 82 FPS, giving players a wide range of options to prioritize visual quality or frame rate. The 1440p results are more balanced, with the Medium preset (83 FPS) offering a good compromise between the High (64 FPS) and Low (103 FPS) presets. The 4K results are consistently below 60 FPS. Even on Low, the average of 57 FPS is marginal for smooth gameplay, and the Ultra preset at 27 FPS is effectively unplayable for action-oriented moments.
How This Combo Ranks
In the Palworld benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and RTX 5060 is ranked 1922 out of 2944 tested combos. This ranking places it in the lower half of the performance distribution, which is a surprising result given the components' individual specifications. This suggests that while the CPU and GPU are individually competent, their combination may not be optimally tuned for Palworld's specific engine requirements, or that the mobile nature of these parts limits their sustained performance.
This rank indicates that many other system configurations, likely including those with more powerful desktop-class GPUs or CPUs with higher single-threaded performance, are able to achieve higher frame rates in this title. The data implies that Palworld may favor raw GPU power and specific CPU instructions more than what this mobile combo can provide at higher settings. The rank serves as a reminder that a high benchmark score in synthetic tests does not always translate directly to top-tier performance in every game.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides substantial multi-threaded capability for tasks like world generation and physics calculations in Palworld, which benefits from having multiple cores available.
Its synthetic benchmark scores are strong. For instance, it achieves 17984.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1810.5 in single-core. The single-core score is particularly relevant for gaming, as many game logic threads rely on single-thread performance. The CPU's percentile ranking of 85 against all CPUs confirms its high-end positioning. However, the data from Palworld suggests that the CPU is not the primary limitation in most scenarios. The frame rate scaling with resolution points to the GPU as the bottleneck, especially at 1440p and 4K. At 1080p Low, where the GPU load is lighter, the CPU's capability is more fully utilized to achieve the high 156 FPS average. The CPU's performance is closely matched with its rivals, showing a delta of less than 1% compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, indicating that it is not a significant differentiator in this game's performance.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's display resolution and preference for frame rate versus visual quality.
- For 1080p displays: The High preset, yielding 97 FPS, is the best balance for a smooth and visually rich experience. If a player has a 144Hz monitor, the Medium preset at 126 FPS is the better choice to maximize the display's potential while retaining good visual detail. The Low preset at 156 FPS is recommended for competitive play or if maximizing frame rate is the absolute priority.
- For 1440p displays: The Medium preset at 83 FPS is the clear recommendation. It provides a frame rate well above the 60 FPS standard for smooth gameplay while maintaining a significant level of graphical fidelity. The High preset at 64 FPS is also viable if visual quality is preferred over a higher frame rate buffer. The Low preset at 103 FPS is excellent for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors but comes with a noticeable visual compromise.
- For 4K displays: This configuration is not well-suited for 4K gaming in Palworld. None of the presets achieve a consistent 60 FPS. The Low preset at 57 FPS is the only playable option, but it will have moments of frame rate drops. For a more stable experience, lowering the resolution to 1440p is strongly advised. The Ultra and High presets at 27 and 35 FPS respectively are not recommended for a playable experience.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 85.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 110.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 136.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 153.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 199.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 246.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 176.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 233.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 301.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 367.0 |
Palworld with iUltra 9 185H + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 185H + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.