Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
180
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 180 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 64 84 108 135
1440p QHD 114 151 196 243
1080p Full HD 174 230 297 363

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 84
3840x2160 Medium 108
3840x2160 Low 135
2560x1440 Ultra 114
2560x1440 High 151
2560x1440 Medium 196
2560x1440 Low 243
1920x1080 Ultra 174
1920x1080 High 230
1920x1080 Medium 297
1920x1080 Low 363

Palworld with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld pairs the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in a combination that ranks 2350th out of 2944 tested configurations in this game, placing it in the lower half of the database. The benchmark data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers playable frame rates at medium to high settings, while 4K performance remains marginal even at lower presets. The RTX 5050’s 8 GB of VRAM and the Core Ultra 5 125H’s 14 cores form a balanced pairing, but the measured results show that Palworld’s demands quickly outpace this hardware at higher resolutions and settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU-GPU combo in Palworld?

A: The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 2350th out of 2944 tested combos for this game, placing it in the 80th percentile of all configurations in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL’s average score of 21153, indicating nearly identical overall GPU performance.

Q: What is the best resolution for playing Palworld with this combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the most viable resolution, with average frame rates ranging from 63 FPS at Ultra settings to 132 FPS at Low settings, while 2560x1440 remains playable and 3840x2160 dips below 30 FPS at High settings.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and clock specifications?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H features 14 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and it scores 12804.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore testing.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5050 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for Palworld’s texture-heavy environments at lower resolutions.

Q: What is the performance delta between the Core Ultra 5 125H and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800?

A: The Core Ultra 5 125H’s average benchmark score of 27507 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800’s score of 27535, showing that the two CPUs are effectively tied in overall processing power.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured data places this configuration at rank 2350 out of 2944 tested combos in Palworld, which translates to roughly the 80th percentile of all systems in the database. This ranking reflects a hardware pairing that is competent but not exceptional for this title, with the RTX 5050’s performance profile and the Core Ultra 5 125H’s processing capabilities combining to deliver mid-tier results. In practical terms, this means the combo will handle Palworld’s survival gameplay without major issues at mainstream resolutions, but it is not positioned to compete with high-end rigs that dominate the upper ranks of the chart.

The combo’s position is driven primarily by the GPU’s modest standing relative to other graphics cards. The RTX 5050 sits at the 66th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, 0.6% lower) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, 1.6% higher). These deltas indicate that the GPU is clustered with older and mid-range parts, which explains why the overall combo rank is not higher. The CPU, by contrast, is more competitive, sitting at the 79th percentile against all CPUs with an average score of 27507, nearly matching the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27535, -0.1%) and Intel Core i5-12600K (27578, -0.3%).

When interpreting the rank, it is important to note that Palworld is a demanding title that stresses both the CPU and GPU, particularly in later game stages with numerous pals and base-building elements. The data shows that this combo’s performance is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results are poor, which drags down its standing relative to combos that can maintain playable frame rates across all resolutions. The 2350th rank out of 2944 suggests that while this setup is far from the bottom, it is outclassed by a significant majority of tested configurations, many of which likely feature more powerful GPUs with higher VRAM capacities or faster memory subsystems.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the primary driver of frame rates in Palworld, and its specifications reveal why it performs as it does across the measured settings. The GPU is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node, featuring 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It has a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical factor for Palworld’s open-world environments that stream textures and assets continuously.

In the context of Palworld, the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth directly influence performance at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data shows a steep drop-off when moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, which is consistent with the 8 GB VRAM buffer becoming a bottleneck. At 1080p, the RTX 5050 delivers 132 FPS on Low settings, 107 FPS on Medium, 82 FPS on High, and 63 FPS on Ultra, indicating that the GPU is well-utilized and not significantly limited by memory constraints. At 1440p, the scores drop to 87 FPS on Low, 71 FPS on Medium, 54 FPS on High, and 41 FPS on Ultra, showing a predictable scaling pattern.

However, at 3840x2160, the GPU struggles considerably: 48 FPS on Low, 39 FPS on Medium, 30 FPS on High, and 23 FPS on Ultra. The minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium is 60 FPS, and at 1080p Medium it is 91 FPS, which suggests that the GPU maintains reasonable frame pacing at lower resolutions but cannot sustain smooth performance at 4K. The RTX 5050’s 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035, places it in the mid-range tier, and its nearest rivals—such as the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, -0.6%) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, 1.6%)—confirm that it is competitive with previous-generation mid-range cards rather than current high-end models.

The GPU’s 130 W TDP and dual-slot design suggest it is intended for mainstream laptops, and the power delivery of a single 8-pin connector supports this. In Palworld, the RTX 5050’s performance is sufficient for a smooth experience at 1080p, but the data indicates that users should avoid pushing to 4K if they want consistent frame rates above 30 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for the game’s current content, but the bandwidth limitation at higher resolutions is evident in the measured results.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and the user’s preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 82 FPS on average, which is a strong balance between image quality and smoothness, while the Ultra preset drops to 63 FPS, which is still playable but may exhibit stuttering in busy scenes. The Medium preset at 107 FPS offers a significant frame rate boost with only a minor reduction in visual quality, making it the best choice for users who prioritize responsiveness over graphical detail.

For 2560x1440, the data shows that the Medium preset is the most viable option, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS, ensuring that frame rates stay above the 60 FPS threshold for most of the gameplay. The High preset at 54 FPS is playable but may feel less fluid, while the Low preset at 87 FPS is the smoothest but sacrifices visual quality. The Ultra preset at 41 FPS is not recommended for 1440p, as it approaches the lower bound of what is considered acceptable for a survival game with fast-paced combat.

At 3840x2160, the measured results are poor across all settings, with the Low preset achieving only 48 FPS and the High preset dropping to 30 FPS. The Medium preset at 39 FPS is the highest average that remains above 30 FPS, but the minimum FPS of 33 FPS indicates that frame drops are likely. Given these numbers, 4K gaming is not recommended for this combo unless the user is willing to accept compromised performance. The best overall experience, according to the data, is achieved at 1920x1080 with the High preset, which provides 82 FPS and balances visual quality with performance, or at 2560x1440 with the Medium preset, which offers 71 FPS and a stable minimum of 60 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed picture of how this combo performs across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 132 FPS on Low, 107 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS), 82 FPS on High, and 63 FPS on Ultra. These numbers indicate that the combo is well-suited for 1080p gaming, with even the Ultra preset maintaining a playable frame rate. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 52% reduction in average FPS, which is typical for a GPU in this class and reflects the increasing demand on the RTX 5050’s 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 87 FPS on Low, 71 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS), 54 FPS on High, and 41 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with the High preset losing 28 FPS and the Ultra preset losing 22 FPS. The minimum FPS of 60 FPS at Medium settings is notable, as it ensures that the game remains smooth in most scenarios, but the Ultra preset’s 41 FPS average suggests that users should avoid it for competitive or fast-paced play.

At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 48 FPS on Low, 39 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 45 FPS), 30 FPS on High, and 23 FPS on Ultra. These numbers confirm that 4K is beyond the comfortable range for this combo, as even the Low preset fails to reach 60 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 33 FPS is particularly concerning, as it indicates significant frame drops during intense moments. The data shows that this combo is best used at 1080p or 1440p, with 4K reserved for static scenes or less demanding activities like base building rather than combat or exploration.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H plays a supporting role in Palworld, but its specifications are important for understanding the overall performance. The CPU features 14 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, and it is built on the Meteor Lake architecture using a 7 nm process node. It has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, with 112 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and it supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

In benchmark testing, the Core Ultra 5 125H achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12804.5 and a single-core score of 1647.5, which positions it at the 79th percentile against all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 27507 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27535, -0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-12600K (27578, -0.3%), indicating that it is competitive with desktop-class processors from the previous generation. For Palworld, which relies on CPU performance for game logic, world simulation, and AI behavior, the 14 cores and 18 threads provide ample headroom for multitasking and background processes.

The CPU’s role in the measured FPS is most evident at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. At 1920x1080 Low settings, the combo achieves 132 FPS, which suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the RTX 5050 with enough data to maintain high frame rates. However, at 4K, the CPU’s impact is minimized as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, with the average FPS dropping to 30 or below regardless of the CPU’s capabilities. The 79th percentile ranking and the close performance to rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (27578, -0.3%) confirm that the Core Ultra 5 125H is not a limiting factor in this configuration, and the overall combo rank is determined more by the GPU’s mid-range performance.

The CPU’s integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG 96EU, is not relevant for this gaming scenario since the RTX 5050 is the active graphics processor, but its presence does not detract from the dedicated GPU’s performance. The CPU’s 28 W TDP is modest for a mobile part, which may affect sustained performance in thin laptops, but the benchmark data suggests that it is sufficient for Palworld’s demands. Overall, the Core Ultra 5 125H provides a solid foundation for the RTX 5050, ensuring that the combo’s performance is limited by the GPU rather than the processor.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Cores / Threads 14 / 18
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 28W
Socket Intel BGA 2049
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 130 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Ultra 64.0
3840x2160 High 84.0
3840x2160 Medium 108.0
3840x2160 Low 135.0
2560x1440 Ultra 114.0
2560x1440 High 151.0
2560x1440 Medium 196.0
2560x1440 Low 243.0
1920x1080 Ultra 174.0
1920x1080 High 230.0
1920x1080 Medium 297.0
1920x1080 Low 363.0

Palworld with iUltra 5 125H + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 125H + RTX 5050

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.