Palworld

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-14700KF brings a substantial 20 cores and 28 threads to Palworld, running on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 3.40 GHz base clock that can boost up to 5.60 GHz. This is a 10 nm part from Intel, and its benchmark profile shows a machine built for heavy multi-threaded workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores reach 44,557, while single-core performance sits at 6,290 in the same test. The CPU's percentile rank against all processors is 96, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 70,104 places it within 1.3% of its nearest rivals — the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 70,074 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69,887 (0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X scores 70,420 (-0.4% delta), showing this chip is in extremely tight competition at the top of the desktop heap.

In Palworld, the 14700KF's role becomes apparent when examining the measured FPS at 1080p Low, where the average hits 316.8 FPS. At such high frame rates, the CPU's single-threaded strength — evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,972 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 6,290 — is what prevents the processor from becoming a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache help with the game's world-streaming and creature AI, which are typical CPU-heavy tasks in survival games. The data suggests that even at the most demanding frame rates, this CPU has headroom left, as the 1080p Low result is nearly double the 4K High result, indicating the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution climbs rather than the processor.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the graphics powerhouse in this pairing, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture at a 5 nm process node. It packs 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's boost clock runs at 2550 MHz, with base at 2295 MHz, and its 10,240 shading units handle the heavy lifting in Palworld's open-world rendering. The 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores are present, though the game's measured results suggest traditional rasterization is the primary workload. The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its position: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 and a Passmark G3D score of 34,245 place it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,610. Its nearest rivals are close: the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 53,489 (0.2% delta), the Radeon Pro W6600M scores 53,414 (0.4% delta), and the Radeon RX 7700S scores 52,505 (2.1% delta), while the RTX 5070 Ti trails at 52,086 (2.9% delta).

The 16 GB VRAM capacity is relevant for Palworld at 4K, where the game's textures and draw distances can consume significant memory. The data shows a clear pattern: at 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS drops to 52.9, which is the lowest result in the entire measured set. This suggests that at Ultra settings, the GPU is being pushed to its limits, and the VRAM bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s is being taxed heavily. The pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 816.0 GTexel/s are the raw throughput figures that determine how quickly the card can fill frames at high resolutions, and the measured results confirm that 4K Ultra is where this GPU starts to show strain.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario at higher settings, but with interesting nuances. Looking at High settings, the average FPS drops from 198.9 at 1080p to 128 at 1440p, then to 74.4 at 4K. This is a 62.6% drop from 1080p to 4K, which is substantial and indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor at these settings. However, the Low settings tell a different story: 316.8 FPS at 1080p falls to 210.7 at 1440p and then to 112.4 at 4K — a 64.5% drop. The fact that Low settings still show a massive decrease from 1080p to 4K suggests that even at minimal graphical load, the resolution is dictating performance, pointing to the GPU becoming the bottleneck regardless of settings.

The Medium settings curve is also telling: from 254.8 FPS at 1080p to 171.3 at 1440p and 93.8 at 4K. The Ultra settings show the steepest relative decline: 151.3 at 1080p, 99.1 at 1440p, and 52.9 at 4K — a 65% drop from 1080p to 4K. This consistent pattern across all settings implies that Palworld is heavily GPU-limited at higher resolutions, and the CPU's contribution, while important for maintaining high frame rates at 1080p, becomes secondary as pixel count climbs. The 1080p Low result of 316.8 FPS is the highest measured, and the gap between 1080p and 1440p at Low (106.1 FPS difference) versus the gap between 1440p and 4K at Low (98.3 FPS difference) shows a relatively uniform scaling pattern, which is typical of a GPU-bound workload.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 115th out of 1,718 tested combos in Palworld. That places it in the top 6.7% of all combinations tested, which is a strong showing given the game's popularity and the wide variety of hardware configurations in the database. The rank reflects the combined capability of both components, and the data suggests that while the CPU is in the 96th percentile and the GPU is in the 88th percentile individually, their pairing in Palworld yields a result that is better than most but not at the absolute top tier.

The ranking implies that there are 114 combinations that outperform this setup in Palworld, which likely includes more powerful GPUs or CPU/GPU pairings that are better balanced for this specific game. The fact that the GPU's percentile (88) is lower than the CPU's (96) hints that the GPU is the more limiting component in this pairing, and combos with higher-end GPUs would rank above it. However, the 115th rank out of 1,718 is still an excellent result, placing this system well within the top tier of gaming performance for Palworld. The measured FPS data supports this ranking — the 4K Ultra average of 52.9 FPS is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, while the 1440p High average of 128 FPS is well-suited for most gaming displays.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in Palworld?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 316.8 at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70,104 on average, which is 0% delta from the Intel Core i7-14700K (70,074), 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 9115 (69,887), and 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (70,420).

Q: What is the lowest average FPS measured for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 52.9, achieved at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations in Palworld?

A: This combo ranks 115th out of 1,718 total combinations tested in Palworld.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 SUPER have, and what memory type is it?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between 1080p High and 4K High settings?

A: The average FPS drops from 198.9 at 1080p High to 74.4 at 4K High, a difference of 124.5 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive picture across three resolutions and four settings tiers. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 316.8 at Low to 198.9 at High, with Medium at 254.8 and Ultra at 151.3. This shows a clear progression where each step up in settings costs a significant amount of performance — the jump from Low to Medium costs 62 FPS, Medium to High costs 55.9 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 47.6 FPS. The 1080p results are all above 150 FPS, making this resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 210.7 at Low, 171.3 at Medium, 128 at High, and 99.1 at Ultra. The 1440p results show that even at Ultra settings, the combo maintains nearly 100 FPS, which is excellent for a 1440p gaming experience. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at each setting is consistent, averaging around 40-60 FPS lost, which is expected given the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 112.4 at Low, 93.8 at Medium, 74.4 at High, and 52.9 at Ultra. The 4K results are the most demanding, and the Ultra setting drops below 60 FPS, which may be a concern for gamers seeking a smooth 4K experience. However, the High setting at 74.4 FPS is playable, and the Medium setting at 93.8 FPS offers a good balance. The data shows that 4K Ultra is the only setting where the combo fails to maintain a 60 FPS average, suggesting that players targeting 4K should consider High or Medium settings for optimal performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience depends heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p displays, all settings are viable — even Ultra maintains 151.3 FPS, which is above the standard 144 Hz refresh rate. Players with 1080p 240 Hz monitors could use Medium at 254.8 FPS or Low at 316.8 FPS to maximize frame rates, but High at 198.9 FPS is the sweet spot for visual quality without sacrificing responsiveness.

For 1440p, the High setting at 128 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides a strong balance between visual fidelity and performance. Ultra at 99.1 FPS is also acceptable for most gamers, but the drop to just under 100 FPS might be noticeable on high-refresh-rate displays. Medium at 171.3 FPS is ideal for competitive play where frame rate takes priority over visuals, while Low at 210.7 FPS is only necessary for extreme refresh rates.

For 4K, the data suggests avoiding Ultra settings, as the 52.9 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS threshold that most gamers consider the minimum for a smooth experience. High at 74.4 FPS is the recommended setting for 4K, providing a playable frame rate while maintaining decent visual quality. Medium at 93.8 FPS is an even better option if players are willing to sacrifice some graphical details for a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Low at 112.4 FPS offers the smoothest 4K experience but at a significant visual cost. The overall recommendation is to prioritize High settings at 1440p for the best balance of performance and quality, with 4K High as a viable alternative for those who prioritize resolution over frame rate.