Palworld
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 122 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 43 | 57 | 73 | 91 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 102 | 132 | 163 |
| 1080p Full HD | 117 | 155 | 201 | 248 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT lands at rank 902 out of 3711 tested combos in Palworld. That places this setup in the top quarter of all configurations tested, which is a strong result for a mainstream desktop pairing. The data shows this combo is positioned to handle the game's demands comfortably, though the GPU percentile suggests there is headroom for improvement if you were to pair the CPU with a more powerful graphics card.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 902 out of 3711 tested combinations puts it in the 75th percentile or better among all CPU-GPU pairings tested for Palworld. This is a solid position, indicating that the i5-14600K and RX 9070 XT work well together for this specific title. The CPU itself sits at the 90th percentile against all CPUs, which is excellent, but the GPU only reaches the 55th percentile against all GPUs. This discrepancy suggests that while the processor is a top-tier performer, the graphics card is more of a mid-range to upper-mid-range option in the broader GPU landscape.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 48618 places it nearly neck-and-neck with its nearest rivals. It is only 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX trails by 0.7%, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.8% ahead. These tiny margins mean the i5-14600K is essentially tied with these alternatives in raw compute performance, making the choice between them come down to platform features and pricing rather than outright speed.
For the GPU, the RX 9070 XT's average benchmark score of 13543 puts it in a strange neighborhood. It is just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7770M and 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570. The NVIDIA P106-090 is 0.5% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 555 is 1% behind. These rivals are all older or lower-tier cards, which is unusual for a modern GPU. This indicates that while the RX 9070 XT performs well in Palworld, its synthetic benchmark scores do not reflect the same level of dominance you might expect from a current-generation card.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. This memory configuration is a significant asset for Palworld, which is an open-world survival game with large draw distances and many objects on screen. The 16 GB frame buffer gives the card plenty of room to store textures and geometry data, which helps maintain consistent frame rates even when the game world is densely populated with Pals and structures.
Clock speeds are another strong point for this GPU. The base clock runs at 1660 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 2970 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz. The game clock is particularly relevant because it represents the typical sustained frequency during actual gameplay. The memory runs at 2518 MHz, which translates to 20.1 Gbps effective. These clocks allow the card to push a pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s, ensuring that the rendering pipeline stays fed even at high resolutions.
The card is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a Navi 48 chip manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, along with 64 ray tracing cores. This hardware configuration delivers 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is substantial for rasterization-heavy workloads like Palworld.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals how this combo scales across resolutions, and the pattern is telling about which component is the limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 248 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 163 FPS, a decrease of about 34%. At 4K Low, the frame rate falls to 91 FPS, which is another 44% drop from 1440p. This steep decline as resolution increases is a clear sign that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this pairing.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings levels. At High settings, 1080p delivers 155 FPS, 1440p delivers 102 FPS, and 4K delivers 57 FPS. The percentage drops are similar to the Low settings case, reinforcing that the RX 9070 XT is doing the heavy lifting and hitting its limits as pixel count rises. Meanwhile, the i5-14600K has plenty of headroom, as evidenced by the extremely high frame rates at 1080p, which are far above what most displays can even show.
The transition from 1440p to 4K is particularly harsh. At Medium settings, 1440p produces 132 FPS, but 4K falls to 73 FPS, a 45% reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 77 FPS at 1440p to 43 FPS at 4K, a 44% reduction. These consistent percentage drops across all settings indicate that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are being saturated at 4K, and the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution tested.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers excellent performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 248 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates the CPU is feeding frames faster than most monitors can display. Medium settings drop to 201 FPS, with a minimum of 171 FPS and a maximum of 231 FPS. High settings yield 155 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage a very playable 117 FPS. Even at Ultra, the frame rate remains well above the 100 FPS threshold, making 1080p a non-issue for this combo.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but starts to show the GPU's limitations. Low settings average 163 FPS, which is still smooth for competitive play. Medium settings average 132 FPS, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. High settings produce 102 FPS, which is good for a 1440p experience. Ultra settings drop to 77 FPS, which is still playable but not as fluid as the lower settings levels.
At 3840x2160, the combo begins to struggle at higher settings. Low settings average 91 FPS, which is playable but no longer in the high-refresh-rate territory. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS, meaning you might see occasional dips below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. High settings drop to 57 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay. Ultra settings fall to 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and indicates the GPU is being overwhelmed at 4K with maximum quality.
The spread between minimum and maximum FPS at Medium settings is worth noting. At 1080p, the range is 60 FPS (171 to 231), at 1440p it is 39 FPS (113 to 152), and at 4K it is 22 FPS (62 to 84). This narrowing range as resolution increases suggests that the GPU becomes more consistently loaded at higher resolutions, reducing frame time variance but also lowering the overall average.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It runs on a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.30 GHz, which is a significant single-core advantage for games that rely on high frequency. The CPU has a 24 MB shared L3 cache, along with 2 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core, providing ample cache for game logic and physics calculations.
In Palworld, the CPU's role is to handle the game's simulation, including the AI of Pals, world state, and physics. The i5-14600K's high boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks like game logic run at maximum speed. Its 20 threads also provide enough parallel processing power for background tasks and multi-threaded game systems. The CPU's benchmark scores reflect this strength, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and a single-core score of 2064.
The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo. At 1080p Low, the system produces 248 FPS, which is an extremely high frame rate that most CPUs would struggle to sustain. The fact that the i5-14600K can feed the RX 9070 XT fast enough to hit this number demonstrates that it has ample headroom for this game. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck at 43 FPS, the CPU is still performing its duties without issue.
The TDP of 125 W for the CPU is modest for a 14-core part, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. This flexibility is a practical advantage, allowing builders to choose their memory platform based on budget and availability. The CPU's market segment is desktop, and it uses Intel Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 support for 16 lanes, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe drives.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo capable of 1080p gaming at high refresh rates?
A: Yes, at 1080p the combo delivers 155 FPS on High settings and 248 FPS on Low settings. Even at Ultra settings, it maintains 117 FPS, which is above the 100 FPS threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: What is the best setting to use at 1440p for a balance of quality and performance?
A: Medium settings at 1440p yield 132 FPS with a minimum of 113 FPS, which provides a smooth experience while maintaining decent visual quality. High settings drop to 102 FPS, which is still playable but with a smaller safety margin.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: At 4K, the combo is playable but not ideal. Low settings produce 91 FPS, and Medium settings produce 73 FPS with a minimum of 62 FPS. High settings drop to 57 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target.
Q: Which component is the bottleneck in this setup?
A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops by roughly 34% from 1080p to 1440p and another 44% from 1440p to 4K, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The CPU has enough headroom to produce 248 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating it is not the limiting factor.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The i5-14600K's average benchmark score of 48618 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, and 0.8% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. The differences are negligible in real-world gaming.
Q: Does the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM matter for Palworld?
A: Yes, the 16 GB frame buffer on the RX 9070 XT is beneficial for Palworld's open-world nature. It prevents texture streaming issues and allows the card to maintain consistent frame rates even when the game world has many objects and characters on screen, which is reflected in the measured performance across all resolution and settings combinations.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600K
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 91.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 73.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 57.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 163.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 132.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 102.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 248.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 201.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 117.0 |
Palworld with ii5-14600K + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600K + RX 9070 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.