Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 93 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 41 | 59 | 68 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 80 | 101 | 125 |
| 1080p Full HD | 92 | 118 | 152 | 189 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld with the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT presents a clear case of a system where the graphics card is the primary bottleneck, but the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance ensures that frame rates remain playable even at the most demanding settings. The measured data indicates a predictable scaling pattern across resolutions, with the gap between low and ultra settings widening as pixel count increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. This combination lands in the upper half of all tested systems for this title, demonstrating a balanced yet GPU-limited partnership.
Resolution Scaling
The performance trajectory from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates the shifting load between the processor and the graphics card. At 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 189.4 FPS on Low settings, which is remarkably high and suggests that the i5-14400F is capable of feeding frames to the RX 6750 XT without significant constraint. However, as the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the same Low preset sees a drop to 124.9 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls further to 68.4 FPS. This pattern demonstrates that while the CPU has headroom at lower resolutions, the GPU’s rendering workload becomes the limiting factor as pixel count rises.
The scaling between settings at each resolution provides insight into the system’s balance. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average from 189.4 FPS to 91.5 FPS, a drop of approximately 52%. At 1440p, the same transition sees a decline from 124.9 FPS to 60 FPS, a 52% reduction as well, but the absolute numbers are lower. At 4K, the Low to Ultra swing goes from 68.4 FPS down to 32.8 FPS, which is a 52% decrease, but the performance envelope is much tighter. This consistency in relative percentage drops across resolutions indicates that the game’s settings scale uniformly, but the absolute frame rates are heavily dictated by pixel throughput, confirming the GPU as the dominant constraint.
Notably, the 4K Ultra result of 32.8 FPS is below the threshold for smooth gameplay, while 4K Low at 68.4 FPS is quite playable. This suggests that users targeting 4K will need to compromise on visual fidelity to maintain fluidity, whereas at 1080p and 1440p, even Ultra settings provide respectable frame rates. The data shows that the i5-14400F, with its boost clock of 4.70 GHz and 10 cores, does not appear to hold back the RX 6750 XT at any tested resolution, as the frame rate degradation aligns closely with the GPU’s expected workload scaling.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate achievable with this combo in Palworld?
A: The highest recorded average is 189.4 FPS at 1920x1080 on Low settings. This indicates the system can push very high frame rates when graphical demands are minimized, highlighting the CPU’s capability to drive the GPU effectively at lower resolutions.
Q: How does the system perform at 4K Ultra settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 32.8 FPS. This is the most demanding configuration tested, and the result suggests that this combination is not ideal for 4K gaming with maximum visual quality, as frame rates fall below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. For instance, at 1080p Ultra the system achieves 91.5 FPS, but at 4K Ultra it falls to 32.8 FPS, a drop that correlates with the GPU’s rendering load. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3093 in Cinebench R23 suggests it is not the bottleneck in this scenario.
Q: What is the difference in performance between Medium and High settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings produce an average of 101.1 FPS, while High settings yield 79.8 FPS. This represents a 21% performance decrease when moving from Medium to High, showing a moderate impact on frame rates for a step up in visual quality.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in Palworld?
A: This combination ranks 853rd out of 1718 tested combos for Palworld. This places it in the 50th percentile of all systems tested, indicating it performs slightly better than the median configuration for this specific game.
Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates at 4K with lower settings?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 on Low settings, the average frame rate is 68.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target for most players. This suggests that with adjusted settings, 4K gaming is viable with this hardware, albeit not at maximum quality.
How This Combo Ranks
In the specific context of Palworld, the Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT achieves a rank of 853 out of 1718 tested combinations. This places the system squarely in the middle of the distribution, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer for this title, it is also far from the bottom. The percentile placement suggests that a significant portion of other tested systems, likely those with more powerful GPUs, outperform this combo, but it also outranks many others, particularly those with older or weaker graphics cards.
The ranking must be interpreted with the understanding that Palworld is a survival game that tends to be more sensitive to GPU capabilities than CPU performance, given its open-world nature and visual effects. The RX 6750 XT, with its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 2560 shading units, provides a solid foundation, but it is not at the top of the GPU hierarchy. The CPU, scoring in the 88th percentile among all processors, is clearly not the weak link, as its multi-core score of 21914 in Cinebench R23 is robust. Therefore, the combo’s mid-pack ranking is primarily a reflection of the GPU’s mid-range status relative to other tested configurations.
The data implies that users seeking higher rankings would need to upgrade the GPU to a more powerful model, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a faster graphics card. Conversely, for users with this exact combo, the ranking suggests that expectations should be set for medium-to-high settings at 1440p, with playable frame rates at 4K only on lower settings. The balance between the two components is well-matched, as neither is drastically underperforming relative to the other, but the overall system is constrained by the GPU’s inherent capabilities.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance across all settings. The Low preset delivers an average of 189.4 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the CPU and GPU are both operating efficiently without bottlenecks. Medium settings yield 152.3 FPS, High settings produce 118.2 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 91.5 FPS. These numbers show a clear progression, with each step up in quality costing a measurable amount of frame rate. The 91.5 FPS at Ultra is still well above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p gaming with maximum settings a comfortable experience.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings average 124.9 FPS, which remains very smooth and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings drop to 101.1 FPS, still maintaining a fluid experience. High settings fall to 79.8 FPS, which is acceptable but begins to show the GPU’s strain. Ultra settings hit an average of 60 FPS exactly, which is the bare minimum for many players, but it is a playable result. The 1440p data indicates that this combo is well-suited for this resolution, offering a good balance between visual quality and performance.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become more apparent. Low settings average 68.4 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. Medium settings drop to 58.8 FPS, below the 60 FPS target. High settings yield 40.8 FPS, which is noticeably less smooth, and Ultra settings fall to 32.8 FPS, which is marginal. The 4K results show that this system is not designed for high-fidelity gaming at this resolution, and users would need to significantly reduce settings to achieve playable frame rates. The data across all resolutions confirms that the RX 6750 XT is the decisive factor in determining overall performance.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT plays a central role in shaping the performance profile of this combo. Its specifications, including a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, are critical in determining how quickly it can process frames. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for the textures and assets in Palworld, but the card’s mid-range positioning is evident in the measured frame rates. The GPU’s 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units allow it to handle modern game rendering, but its performance is ultimately bound by its transistor count of 17,200 million and a die size of 335 mm².
The benchmark scores for the GPU, such as a Passmark G3D score of 20700 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2548, place it in the 79th percentile among all GPUs. This percentile ranking indicates that it outperforms a majority of graphics cards, but it is not in the top tier. In Palworld, this translates to the frame rates seen in the data, where the GPU struggles to maintain high FPS at 4K but excels at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s memory of 12 GB is a notable asset, allowing for high-resolution textures without excessive stuttering, but the card’s raw compute power, capped at 13.31 TFLOPS, limits its ability to push ultra-high resolutions smoothly.
The interaction between the GPU and CPU is well-balanced, as the i5-14400F does not appear to starve the RX 6750 XT of data. The CPU’s performance, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a Passmark single-thread score of 3723, ensures that it can keep up with the GPU’s demands. However, the data makes it clear that the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing, particularly at higher resolutions. The 4K results, where frame rates drop dramatically, are a direct consequence of the GPU’s rendering capabilities, not the CPU’s processing power. For users considering this combo, it is essential to recognize that the GPU dictates the upper limits of performance, and upgrades to the CPU would yield minimal gains in Palworld.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14400F
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 68.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 58.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 32.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 124.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 101.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 79.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 60.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 189.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 152.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 118.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 91.5 |
Palworld with ii5-14400F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14400F + RX 6750 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.