Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
77
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 77 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 34 47 56
1440p QHD 51 63 82 102
1080p Full HD 75 100 127 162

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 47
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Ultra 29
2560x1440 Low 102
2560x1440 Medium 82
2560x1440 High 63
2560x1440 Ultra 51
1920x1080 Low 162
1920x1080 Medium 127
1920x1080 High 100
1920x1080 Ultra 75

Palworld with Intel Core i5-11400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with resolution, and the Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT shows a clear trajectory from a high-refresh-rate 1080p setup to a 4K configuration that struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The measured data indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck as pixel count rises, while the CPU's capabilities are sufficient to keep up at lower resolutions. The transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 and then to 3840x2160 reveals a consistent and substantial drop in average frames per second across all settings presets, underscoring the graphical intensity of Palworld's open-world environments.

Resolution Scaling

The performance degradation from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all quality presets, pointing directly at the Radeon RX 6650 XT as the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At the High preset, the average frame rate falls from 100.3 FPS at 1920x1080 to 62.7 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of approximately 37%, before plummeting further to 34 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 66% drop from the 1080p baseline, a clear indication that the GPU's processing throughput is being exhausted by the increased pixel workload. The pattern is similar for the Low preset, where the average goes from 161.9 FPS at 1080p down to 101.9 FPS at 1440p and then to 56.3 FPS at 4K, showing that even at the lowest graphical fidelity, the pixel count alone is enough to halve performance at the highest resolution.

The scaling factor between 1440p and 4K is particularly telling. At Medium settings, the average FPS at 2560x1440 is 81.9, but at 3840x2160 it drops to 47.1, a 42% decrease. This non-linear falloff suggests that the GPU is hitting a memory bandwidth or fill-rate ceiling, as the 8 GB VRAM buffer and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are stressed by the 4K framebuffer. The data shows that the system is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, where the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, but becomes increasingly GPU-bound at 1440p and severely so at 4K. For users targeting 4K, the benchmark results indicate that only the Low preset approaches a playable 60 FPS threshold, and even then, it barely does so with an average of 56.3 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 23 chip, is the primary driver of the frame rates observed in Palworld. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s, which is a critical resource for texture streaming and asset loading in a survival game with vast, explorable landscapes. The clock speeds are robust, with a base of 2055 MHz and a boost of 2635 MHz, allowing the GPU to push high fill rates when the workload permits. The pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s are specifications that directly influence how well the card handles the detailed geometry and surface textures of Palworld's world.

The GPU's performance percentile versus all GPUs is 72, placing it in the upper-middle tier of graphics cards. Its benchmark scores show a strong showing in DirectX 11 with a Passmark score of 169, but a lower score of 62 in DirectX 12, which is relevant given Palworld's likely API usage. The FP32 performance of 10.79 TFLOPS is a solid figure for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the data confirms that it is insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at 4K with higher settings. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is just 29 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that the GPU's raw compute and memory subsystem are overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and maximum graphical fidelity.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Palworld, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-11400F and the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT ranks 1123 out of 1718 total combinations. This places the combo in the lower-middle portion of the rankings, with a percentile placement that suggests it is outperformed by a majority of other tested systems. The rank is a composite measure that accounts for performance across all resolutions and settings, and the data shows that while the combo excels at 1080p, its 4K performance drags down its overall standing. The CPU itself, the i5-11400F, has a percentile rank of 75 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17181, placing it close to rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U and Intel Core i7-1260P, with negligible delta percentages.

The GPU's individual percentile rank is 72, with an average benchmark score of 29024, and it is closely matched with the AMD Radeon RX 6800M and AMD Radeon RX 470, showing that it sits in a competitive performance tier. However, the combo rank of 1123 indicates that the pair does not synergize as well as other top-tier combinations, likely due to the GPU being the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The data implies that for a budget-conscious gamer focusing on 1080p, this combo is capable, but for those expecting 4K capability, the rank reflects its limitations. The delta percentages against the CPU's nearest rivals are minimal, around 0.2% or less, meaning the i5-11400F is not a performance outlier, but rather a solid mid-range processor that holds its own in this specific game's benchmarks.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the combo's capabilities across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system is at its best, with the Low preset delivering an average of 161.9 FPS, which is more than enough for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset yields 126.5 FPS, while High produces 100.3 FPS, all of which are smooth and responsive for competitive or casual play. The Ultra preset drops to 74.8 FPS, still playable but showing that the GPU is starting to feel the strain of maximum settings. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 101.9 FPS for Low, 81.9 FPS for Medium, 62.7 FPS for High, and 50.5 FPS for Ultra, demonstrating a clear step-down that pushes the system into a territory where 60 FPS is only achievable at Medium settings or lower.

At 3840x2160, the performance falls off a cliff. The Low preset manages an average of 56.3 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target but not comfortably so. The Medium preset drops to 47.1 FPS, High to 34 FPS, and Ultra to a mere 29 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming is not a viable option for this hardware combination unless the user is willing to sacrifice visual quality to the lowest settings and accept a marginally playable frame rate. The data shows a consistent pattern: the combo is a 1080p champion, a capable 1440p performer, and a 4K weakling. The lack of min and max FPS data means that stuttering and frame time consistency cannot be assessed, but the averages alone paint a clear picture of the system's limits.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal experience for this Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination is at 1920x1080 with the High preset. This configuration provides an average of 100.3 FPS, which balances visual fidelity with a high, consistent frame rate that exceeds the 60 FPS standard and is suitable for most displays. The Medium preset at 1080p, with 126.5 FPS, is also an excellent choice for users who prioritize frame rate over graphics, offering a 26% improvement over High while still maintaining a high level of detail that is likely imperceptible in fast-paced gameplay. The Ultra preset at 74.8 FPS is acceptable for those who demand maximum visual quality, but the data suggests that the slight visual gains do not justify the 25% performance penalty over High.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts to the Medium preset, which delivers 81.9 FPS. This is the sweet spot for 1440p, providing a smooth experience that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. The High preset at 62.7 FPS is still playable, but it is borderline for users with high-refresh-rate monitors, and the Low preset at 101.9 FPS is recommended for competitive players who need the highest possible frame rates. For 4K, the only viable option is the Low preset at 56.3 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. The Medium preset at 47.1 FPS is too choppy for most users, and the High and Ultra presets are not recommended due to their sub-40 FPS averages. The data clearly indicates that users should stick to 1080p or 1440p to fully leverage the hardware's strengths and avoid the performance collapse at 4K.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-11400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2600 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1200
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2635 MHz MHz
TDP 176 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-11400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.3
3840x2160 Medium 47.1
3840x2160 High 34.0
3840x2160 Ultra 29.0
2560x1440 Low 101.9
2560x1440 Medium 81.9
2560x1440 High 62.7
2560x1440 Ultra 50.5
1920x1080 Low 161.9
1920x1080 Medium 126.5
1920x1080 High 100.3
1920x1080 Ultra 74.8

Palworld with ii5-11400F + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-11400F + RX 6650 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.