Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 35 | 45 | 57 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 64 | 81 | 97 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 95 | 124 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-11400F + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld with the Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT presents a classic high-refresh-rate 1080p pairing that starts to show its limits as resolution climbs. The measured frames per second across the four presets reveal a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions but still has enough CPU headroom to push very high frame rates at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the scaling behavior, component roles, and optimal settings based strictly on the recorded data.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lives. At 1080p High, the combo produces 95 FPS, but moving to 1440p High drops that to 63.6 FPS, and 4K High falls to 34.9 FPS. That is a 63% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at High settings, which is a massive hit that points directly at the GPU struggling to fill those extra pixels.
The pattern holds across all presets. At Low settings, the system delivers 151.4 FPS at 1080p, 96.6 FPS at 1440p, and 56.5 FPS at 4K. Even at the lowest quality, the 4K figure is barely above half of the 1080p result. The scaling is roughly linear with pixel count, which is the signature of a GPU-limited scenario. The RX 5700 XT is doing the heavy lifting, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are being saturated by the sheer pixel throughput at 4K.
Interestingly, the gap between 1440p and 4K is proportionally larger than the gap between 1080p and 1440p. For example, at Medium settings, 1080p yields 124.1 FPS, 1440p drops to 80.5 FPS, and 4K plummets to 45 FPS. The 1440p to 4K transition costs 35.5 FPS, whereas the 1080p to 1440p transition costs 43.6 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is hitting a memory bandwidth or compute ceiling as resolution scales, with the 4K Ultra result of 27.5 FPS being the clearest indicator that this combo is not suited for 4K gaming in Palworld.
The data shows that 1080p is the sweet spot for this pairing. At 1440p, the frame rates are still playable on High and Medium, but the drop from 95 to 63.6 FPS at High is significant. For players targeting 144Hz monitors, 1440p is not viable; the 4K results are squarely in slideshow territory for competitive play. The resolution scaling behavior confirms that the RX 5700 XT is the limiting component, as the CPU has enough headroom to push well beyond 150 FPS at 1080p Low.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread Rocket Lake processor with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. In this Palworld configuration, its role is to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions. The benchmark data supports this: at 1080p Low, the system hits 151.4 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that requires solid single-thread performance.
Looking at the CPU's synthetic scores, the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 14372 and single-core score of 2029 indicate a balanced processor that can handle both the physics and AI workloads typical of a survival game like Palworld. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5619 and max-thread score of 5652 show that the CPU scales well with multi-threaded loads, but the single-thread score of 868 suggests that per-core performance is adequate rather than exceptional.
The 12 MB of shared L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for this game, as evidenced by the fact that the FPS does not crater when moving from 1080p Low to 1080p High. The delta between Low and High at 1080p is 56.4 FPS, which is entirely attributable to GPU load. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the frame rates at 1080p Low and High to be much closer together, as the CPU would be maxed out regardless of GPU settings.
At 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes further. The fact that 4K Low (56.5 FPS) is nearly double 4K High (34.9 FPS) confirms that the GPU is the sole constraint at that resolution. The i5-11400F is not holding the RX 5700 XT back at any resolution tested; it is providing enough headroom for the GPU to reach its full potential. This is a textbook example of a mid-range CPU pairing well with a mid-range GPU, where the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in modern titles.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the best experience is achieved at 1080p with Medium settings. The data shows 124.1 FPS at 1080p Medium, which is only 27.3 FPS less than Low but provides a significant visual quality uplift. The jump from Medium to High at 1080p costs 29.1 FPS (from 124.1 to 95), which is a steep price for marginal visual gains in a survival game where you are often scanning distant horizons.
At 1440p, the recommendation shifts to Medium as well. The 80.5 FPS result at 1440p Medium is the best balance of fluidity and fidelity, as High drops to 63.6 FPS and Ultra falls to 45.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is not worth considering at any resolution, as it delivers 68.5 FPS at 1080p, 45.6 FPS at 1440p, and 27.5 FPS at 4K. These numbers are too low for a game that requires quick reactions to catch Pals or dodge attacks.
For 4K users, the only viable option is Low settings at 56.5 FPS. Medium at 4K produces 45 FPS, which is borderline for single-player, but High and Ultra are unplayable. The data suggests that this combo should be used at 1080p for competitive play or 1440p for a more immersive experience, with Medium as the universal sweet spot across both resolutions.
The key takeaway is that the performance cost of Ultra is disproportionate to its visual benefit. The delta between Medium and Ultra at 1080p is 55.6 FPS, which is a massive hit for what is typically a modest increase in shadow quality and draw distance. Stick with Medium for the best frame rate per visual quality ratio.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the Intel Core i5-11400F and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ranks 1272 out of 1718 tested combos in Palworld. That places it in the bottom 26% of all combinations tested, which is notable given the individual components' respectable benchmark scores. The CPU sits in the 75th percentile against all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 68th percentile, yet the combo ranking is lower than those individual percentiles would suggest.
This discrepancy indicates that Palworld is particularly demanding on the GPU, and the RX 5700 XT is not able to leverage its otherwise mid-tier performance to achieve high frame rates at higher resolutions. The combo rank of 1272 out of 1718 means there are 446 combos that perform worse, but it also means that a significant majority of tested systems deliver better Palworld performance.
Looking at the nearest rivals for each component provides context. The CPU's closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, has an average score of 17189 with a 0% delta, meaning they are effectively tied. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, scores 24763 with a -0.1% delta, also a near-tie. These close margins suggest that the i5-11400F and RX 5700 XT are well-matched to their peers, but the Palworld-specific combo ranking reveals that this pairing is not optimized for this particular game.
The low combo rank is primarily driven by the GPU's performance ceiling. The RX 5700 XT's 9.754 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 121.9 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply not enough to drive Palworld at high settings beyond 1080p. The data indicates that users with this combo should expect below-average performance compared to the broader test pool, but the 1080p Medium result of 124.1 FPS is still a very playable experience.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the star of this show, and its specs directly explain the frame rate patterns. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, running at a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1905 MHz. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the key factor in how the card handles resolution scaling.
At 1080p, the GPU is able to push high frame rates because the memory bandwidth is sufficient for the pixel workload. The 124.1 FPS at Medium and 95 FPS at High are strong results for a card of this class. However, the 4K results expose the GPU's limitations. The 34.9 FPS at 4K High and 27.5 FPS at 4K Ultra indicate that the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for the massive pixel count, causing the frame rate to crumble.
The GPU's RDNA 1.0 architecture and 7 nm process node from TSMC give it a 251 mm² die with 10,300 million transistors. The 9.754 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is competitive for its generation, but Palworld's engine seems to be particularly sensitive to memory bandwidth and raw fill rate. The pixel rate of 121.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 304.8 GTexel/s are the specs that matter most, and they are simply outpaced at 4K.
The GPU's percentile ranking of 68th against all GPUs is respectable, but its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A350M (0.3% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (0.6% delta), which are mobile parts. This suggests that the desktop RX 5700 XT is being compared favorably to lower-power mobile solutions, but it still cannot overcome the fundamental resolution scaling issue. For Palworld, the GPU is the primary driver of performance, and its 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p but becomes a constraint at 4K where texture streaming demands more memory.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and preset for this combo in Palworld?
A: The data shows 1080p Medium provides 124.1 FPS, which is the best balance of performance and quality. At 1440p, Medium drops to 80.5 FPS and is still playable, but 4K is only viable on Low at 56.5 FPS.
Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Palworld?
A: No, the measured 4K results are 34.9 FPS on High and 27.5 FPS on Ultra, which are below playable thresholds. Even 4K Medium at 45 FPS is marginal, so 4K is not recommended for this pairing.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Intel Core i5-11400F is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, with a 0% delta in average benchmark score. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p.
Q: Why is the combo rank so low at 1272 out of 1718?
A: The combo rank is driven by the GPU's limited performance at higher resolutions. While the CPU and GPU individually rank in the 75th and 68th percentiles, respectively, Palworld's GPU-intensive nature means the RX 5700 XT cannot compete with higher-tier cards.
Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, Low delivers 151.4 FPS while Ultra drops to 68.5 FPS, a difference of 82.9 FPS. This shows that Ultra is not worth the performance cost, as the visual upgrade is not commensurate with the frame rate loss.
Q: Is the RX 5700 XT's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Palworld?
A: Yes, the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, as shown by the playable frame rates at those resolutions. However, at 4K, the memory bandwidth and capacity become limiting factors, contributing to the low FPS figures.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-11400F
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-11400F + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 56.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 34.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 96.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 63.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 45.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 151.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 124.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68.5 |
Palworld with ii5-11400F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 5700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-11400F + RX 5700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.