Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
72
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 72 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 36 42 55
1440p QHD 44 59 79 98
1080p Full HD 68 92 121 147

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 55
3840x2160 Medium 42
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Ultra 25
2560x1440 Low 98
2560x1440 Medium 79
2560x1440 High 59
2560x1440 Ultra 44
1920x1080 Low 147
1920x1080 Medium 121
1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Ultra 68

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a solid, playable experience in Palworld, though the data shows that the optimal settings depend heavily on your target resolution. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming or smooth 1440p gameplay, while 4K remains a significant challenge.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data points to a clear hierarchy for this hardware pairing. For users prioritizing smoothness, the Low preset provides the only 100+ FPS experience across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, Low yields an average of 147 FPS, which is ideal for high refresh rate monitors. At 2560x1440, Low drops to 98 FPS, still comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. Even at 3840x2160, Low manages 54.6 FPS, which is the only playable option at that resolution.

The Medium preset represents the best balance between visual fidelity and performance. It delivers 121 FPS at 1080p and 78.6 FPS at 1440p, both of which are excellent for maintaining smooth motion. The step from Medium to High is substantial, with a 24.2% reduction in FPS at 1080p (from 121 to 91.7) and a 25.1% reduction at 1440p (from 78.6 to 58.9). High is still playable, particularly at 1440p where it hovers near 60 FPS, but the cost of the upgrade is steep.

Ultra settings are the outlier here. At 1080p, Ultra produces 68 FPS, which is a 43.8% drop from Medium. At 1440p, it falls to 43.6 FPS, and at 4K it plummets to 25 FPS. The data strongly suggests avoiding Ultra unless you have a G-Sync or FreeSync display and can tolerate sub-60 frame rates. For the vast majority of users, Medium is the recommended preset, as it preserves most of the visual quality while keeping frame rates high enough to avoid noticeable stutter. If frame rate is the absolute priority, Low is the fallback, but it is not necessary for a good experience at 1080p or 1440p.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580 is the primary driver of Palworld's performance, and its specifications explain the scaling patterns observed. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is generous for a game of Palworld's scope, likely preventing VRAM capacity from being a bottleneck at any of the tested settings, even at 4K Ultra where the average FPS is a mere 25.

The Arc B580 operates at a consistent 2670 MHz for both base and boost clocks. Its Xe2-HPG architecture includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The FP32 compute throughput is rated at 13.67 TFLOPS. These figures place the GPU in a specific performance tier, and the benchmark results show it is well-matched to the 5700X3D for this title. The GPU's percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 66, indicating it sits above the median but is not a top-tier part.

The relationship between GPU and CPU is evident in the frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 147 FPS, which is high enough that the CPU's single-thread performance (a 3DMark single-thread score of 804) could start to become a factor. However, the consistent scaling from Low to Ultra across all resolutions suggests the GPU remains the limiting component throughout the test range. The 12 GB VRAM is particularly useful for Palworld's open-world environments, which often feature dense foliage and numerous creatures that can tax memory usage.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 1332 out of 1718 tested combos for Palworld. This places it in the 22nd percentile of all combinations, meaning a significant majority of other pairings deliver higher average frame rates. This ranking is lower than the individual component percentiles might suggest, which indicates that the combination is not optimal for this specific game, or that the game's engine favors other hardware configurations.

The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 82, and the GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 66. The fact that the combo rank is considerably lower than either individual percentile implies that Palworld's performance is not solely dependent on raw component strength, but rather on how well the two work together. The data shows a disparity between the component scores and the in-game result, which is a classic sign of a bottleneck or suboptimal driver optimization for this particular pairing.

The nearest rivals for the CPU, such as the Intel Core i7-1360P (with a delta of 0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D (0.3% delta), have nearly identical average benchmark scores. This indicates the 5700X3D is well-positioned in terms of raw processing power. However, the GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which has a delta of -0.7% (meaning the B580 scores slightly higher in synthetic tests). Despite this, the in-game ranking suggests that the NVIDIA driver stack may be more effective in Palworld, or that the B580's performance is more variable in real-world scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are as follows: Low averages 147 FPS, Medium averages 121 FPS, High averages 91.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 68 FPS. This represents a total performance spread of 79 FPS from the lowest to the highest settings, with each step up in quality costing roughly 20-30 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results are: Low averages 98 FPS, Medium averages 78.6 FPS, High averages 58.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 43.6 FPS. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with a reduction of approximately 33% at Low settings and 36% at Ultra settings. The system remains capable of delivering a smooth 60 FPS experience at Medium settings, which is the recommended target for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the results become marginal: Low averages 54.6 FPS, Medium averages 41.8 FPS, High averages 35.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. None of these settings achieve a consistent 60 FPS, and only Low breaches the 50 FPS mark. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is 6.1 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 10.7 FPS, showing that the performance penalty for Ultra is disproportionately large at this resolution.

The data reveals a consistent pattern where the jump from Medium to High is more costly than the jump from Low to Medium. At 1080p, the delta between Low and Medium is 26 FPS (a 17.7% increase), while the delta between Medium and High is 29.3 FPS (a 24.2% decrease). This suggests that the High preset enables additional effects that are particularly taxing on the Arc B580's architecture.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling from 1080p to 4K is severe and consistent across all settings, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiting factor. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 35%. Specifically, Low drops from 147 to 98 (a 33.3% reduction), Medium from 121 to 78.6 (35.0%), High from 91.7 to 58.9 (35.8%), and Ultra from 68 to 43.6 (35.9%).

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is even more pronounced. Low drops from 98 to 54.6 (44.3% reduction), Medium from 78.6 to 41.8 (46.8%), High from 58.9 to 35.7 (39.4%), and Ultra from 43.6 to 25 (42.7%). This disproportionate drop at higher resolutions is a clear sign that the GPU is running out of pixel throughput and memory bandwidth headroom. The 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p, but the 4K resolution demands significantly more data transfer, which the B580 cannot fully provide.

The resolution scaling data also shows that the CPU is not a limiting factor in this game. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions. Instead, the FPS decreases sharply as resolution increases, which is the classic signature of GPU-bound performance. The Ryzen 7 5700X3D's 96 MB of shared L3 cache and 8-core/16-thread configuration provide ample headroom for Palworld's simulation and AI tasks, allowing the GPU to be the sole determinant of frame rate. The result is a pairing that excels at 1080p and 1440p, but the data clearly shows that 4K gaming is not a realistic target for this combination.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4100 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Intel Arc B580 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 54.6
3840x2160 Medium 41.8
3840x2160 High 35.7
3840x2160 Ultra 25.0
2560x1440 Low 98.0
2560x1440 Medium 78.6
2560x1440 High 58.9
2560x1440 Ultra 43.6
1920x1080 Low 147.0
1920x1080 Medium 121.0
1920x1080 High 91.7
1920x1080 Ultra 68.0

Palworld with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.