Palworld

Palworld's measured performance with the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER reveals a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions, with the GPU acting as the primary performance driver while the CPU provides ample headroom. The data indicates a system capable of high refresh rate play at 1080p and smooth 60+ FPS experiences at 4K, though the Ultra preset imposes a significant load that curbs frame rates considerably.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate progression from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 shows a consistent and steep decline across all settings, which is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 252.7 at 1080p to 183.4 at 1440p, a reduction of 69.3 FPS, and then further to 103.9 at 4K, marking a total drop of 148.8 FPS from the baseline. This represents a 58.9% decrease in performance from 1080p to 4K at Low, demonstrating that the rendering resolution has a massive impact on the workload.

For High settings, the scaling is equally pronounced: 171.9 FPS at 1080p drops to 115.1 at 1440p, then to 65.1 at 4K. The 4K result is only 37.9% of the 1080p figure, reinforcing that the RTX 4070 SUPER's pixel throughput is the limiting factor here. The pattern is consistent with the GPU's 192-bit memory bus and 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which becomes increasingly strained as pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K.

The data also reveals that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution. The Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, maintains high frame rates even at 1080p Low where the CPU would typically be the constraint. The difference between 1080p Low (252.7 FPS) and 1440p Low (183.4 FPS) is 69.3 FPS, which is a larger absolute gap than the 39.3 FPS difference between 1440p and 4K at the same settings. This suggests that the GPU is still the dominant factor even at lower resolutions, and the CPU's Zen 2 architecture is not holding back the system.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The RTX 4070 SUPER's specifications directly explain its performance profile in Palworld. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, which are relatively high frequencies for the Ada Lovelace architecture. This clock speed, combined with 7168 shading units, allows for substantial raw compute throughput, evidenced by the 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance. These figures correlate with the strong 1080p results, where the GPU can leverage its compute power without memory bandwidth constraints.

The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This is a critical factor for Palworld at higher resolutions, as the game's open-world environments and creature populations demand significant texture and geometry data. The 4K Ultra result of 50.5 FPS suggests that the memory subsystem is near its limits, as the 4K High result (65.1 FPS) is only 14.6 FPS higher, indicating diminishing returns from reduced settings. The GPU's 80 ROPs and 224 TMUs also play a role, with the pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s being a potential constraint at 4K.

Interestingly, the GPU's percentile ranking of 84 among all GPUs places it in the upper echelon, but its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A6000 with a delta of -0.2% and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE at -0.3%. This suggests that the 4070 SUPER is positioned competitively, yet the measured Palworld data shows it can deliver 252.7 FPS at 1080p Low, which is exceptionally high for a survival game. The GPU's 220 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it is a power-efficient solution for the performance delivered.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the comprehensive database of tested hardware combinations, this pairing of the Ryzen 7 3700X and RTX 4070 SUPER achieves a rank of 315 out of 1718 combos for Palworld. This places the configuration in the top 18.3% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing given the CPU's age from 2019. The rank is particularly notable because the CPU's average benchmark score of 28631 puts it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average of 42576 places it at the 84th percentile of all GPUs.

The combo's rank of 315 suggests that while both components are individually strong, there may be some synergy losses. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600, has an average score of 28654 with a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 3700X is essentially identical in raw compute. However, the i5-12600 is a newer architecture, and it is plausible that in Palworld, which may rely on single-threaded performance, the 3700X's single-core score of 2694 in Cinebench R23 could be a slight handicap. Yet, the measured FPS data shows no obvious CPU bottleneck, so the rank is likely a reflection of the GPU's performance ceiling in this specific title.

The fact that the combo sits at 315 out of 1718, rather than higher, could indicate that many other tested combos feature newer CPUs or higher-tier GPUs. The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rival, the RTX A6000 with a delta of -0.2%, shows that the GPU is not at the very top of the hierarchy, which explains why the combo does not break into the top 200. This rank is nonetheless respectable, offering a clear picture of where this system stands relative to the broader hardware landscape.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution to play Palworld at with this hardware for a high refresh rate experience?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the system achieves an average of 223.3 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz threshold. For 1440p, the High preset delivers 115.1 FPS, which is suitable for a 120 Hz monitor, but for a 144 Hz display, the Low preset at 183.4 FPS is required.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER's memory configuration impact 4K performance?

A: The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. At 4K, the High preset yields 65.1 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 50.5 FPS, suggesting that the memory bandwidth is a limiting factor when pushing higher pixel counts and more detailed textures.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 3700X a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 SUPER in this game?

A: The data indicates no CPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 252.7 FPS, which is exceptionally high. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, are sufficient to feed the GPU, as evidenced by the consistent scaling from 1080p to 4K without any anomalies that would suggest CPU limitations.

Q: What is the expected frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 183.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 84 FPS. This represents a 99.4 FPS difference, or a 54.2% reduction in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 315th out of 1718 tested combinations for Palworld, placing it in the top 18.3% of all systems tested. This rank is consistent with the GPU's 84th percentile ranking and the CPU's 85th percentile ranking among their respective categories.

Q: What is the impact of the CPU's cache on game performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X has a 32 MB L3 cache and 512 KB L2 cache per core. While the exact impact on Palworld is not directly measured, the CPU's overall benchmark scores, such as 19087 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, suggest that the cache configuration is adequate for maintaining high frame rates, as evidenced by the 252.7 FPS result at 1080p Low.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides a solid foundation for Palworld's multithreaded workloads. The CPU's base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz are relatively modest by modern standards, but the Zen 2 architecture's efficiency allows it to keep pace with the RTX 4070 SUPER. The CPU's benchmark results, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19087 and a single-core score of 2694, demonstrate a balanced performance profile that aligns with the measured game data.

At 1080p Low, the system reaches 252.7 FPS, which is a clear indicator that the CPU is not the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see frame rates plateau or even drop at lower resolutions, but instead, the FPS scales consistently with the GPU's load. The CPU's 32 MB L3 cache is a significant asset for open-world games like Palworld, which often require rapid access to game state data. The 3,800 million transistors on a 74 mm² die size, manufactured on a 7 nm process, contribute to the CPU's ability to handle complex simulations without stuttering.

The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600, has an average score of 28654 with a delta of -0.1%, indicating they are statistically tied in synthetic benchmarks. However, the 3700X's older architecture might exhibit different behavior in specific games. The fact that the combo ranks 315th out of 1718 suggests that while the CPU is capable, it may not extract the absolute maximum from the GPU in Palworld, potentially due to single-threaded performance limitations. Yet, the observed FPS numbers do not show any significant dips or inconsistencies, so the CPU's role is best described as a reliable partner that does not impede the GPU's output.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For players targeting a 60 FPS baseline at 4K, the High preset is the only viable option, as it delivers 65.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to 50.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 4K offers 84.2 FPS, providing a comfortable margin for those who prefer smoother gameplay over visual fidelity. Given that the Low preset at 4K achieves 103.9 FPS, there is substantial headroom for players to prioritize frame rate if desired.

At 1440p, the High preset is the recommended choice for a balanced experience, delivering 115.1 FPS, which is ideal for 120 Hz displays. The Medium preset at 146.4 FPS is also an excellent option for players with 144 Hz monitors, offering a significant boost over High without requiring a substantial visual compromise. The Ultra preset at 84 FPS is still playable but may not be worth the 31.1 FPS drop from Medium unless visual quality is paramount.

For 1080p, the data suggests that the Ultra preset at 133.8 FPS is the best choice for most players, as it provides a high frame rate while maximizing visual quality. However, for competitive or high refresh rate play, the Medium preset at 223.3 FPS or even the Low preset at 252.7 FPS offers a substantial advantage. The High preset at 171.9 FPS is a middle ground that balances quality and performance, but the Ultra preset's higher fidelity at 133.8 FPS is likely the sweet spot for the majority of users. The recommendation is to use Ultra at 1080p, High at 1440p, and High at 4K to maintain a consistent 60+ FPS experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are as follows: Low settings achieve 252.7 FPS, Medium settings achieve 223.3 FPS, High settings achieve 171.9 FPS, and Ultra settings achieve 133.8 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent degradation, with the largest single-step drop occurring between Medium and High, a difference of 51.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 29.4 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 38.1 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a heavy load on the GPU.

At 2560x1440, the measured results are 183.4 FPS for Low, 146.4 FPS for Medium, 115.1 FPS for High, and 84 FPS for Ultra. The relative scaling is similar to 1080p, with a 37 FPS drop from Low to Medium, a 31.3 FPS drop from Medium to High, and a 31.1 FPS drop from High to Ultra. This shows that the performance penalty for each settings tier is roughly consistent at 1440p, with the Ultra preset being the least efficient in terms of frame rate per quality increase.

At 3840x2160, the measured values are 103.9 FPS for Low, 84.2 FPS for Medium, 65.1 FPS for High, and 50.5 FPS for Ultra. The drops are 19.7 FPS from Low to Medium, 19.1 FPS from Medium to High, and 14.6 FPS from High to Ultra. The diminishing returns at 4K are evident, as the absolute FPS losses become smaller with higher settings, but the percentage reduction remains significant. Notably, the 4K Ultra result of 50.5 FPS is the only measured value below 60 FPS, highlighting the demands of this preset at 4K.