Palworld
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 178 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 64 | 79 | 107 | 132 |
| 1440p QHD | 114 | 149 | 196 | 239 |
| 1080p Full HD | 174 | 226 | 294 | 367 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis
# Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
This benchmark analysis covers the Palworld performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, a combination ranking 13th out of 1,718 tested CPU-GPU pairings for this survival title. The CPU, based on Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm process, features 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The GPU, built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, carries 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus. Measured data across four resolutions and four settings presets reveal a system capable of very high frame rates, with the CPU becoming a more significant factor at lower resolutions.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for high-refresh-rate play?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 367.1 FPS average. Even at 2560x1440 with High settings, it maintains 148.8 FPS, making 1440p a strong choice for smooth gameplay.
Q: How much performance drops when moving from 1080p to 4K on Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate falls from 174 FPS at 1920x1080 to 63.6 FPS at 3840x2160 on Ultra, a reduction of approximately 63%. This indicates a shift from CPU-bound to GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions.
Q: Which settings preset provides the highest raw frame rate at 4K?
A: Low settings at 3840x2160 yield 131.6 FPS, which is the fastest 4K result in the measured data. Ultra settings at the same resolution drop to 63.6 FPS.
Q: Is the RTX 5090 the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: Data suggests the CPU becomes a bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (367.1 FPS) and Ultra (174 FPS) is 193.1 FPS, a difference of 111%, which is larger than the scaling seen at 4K.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600X has an average benchmark score of 26,272, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U by 0% and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U by 0.1%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X by 0.2%.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?
A: Medium settings produce 196.1 FPS, while High settings produce 148.8 FPS at 2560x1440. The 47.3 FPS gap (approximately 32%) represents a meaningful visual quality trade-off.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data shows that the optimal settings preset depends heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, even Ultra settings deliver 174 FPS, which comfortably exceeds typical high-refresh-rate monitor capabilities. For maximum smoothness at this resolution, Low settings reach 367.1 FPS, but Medium at 293.6 FPS provides a balanced experience with better visual fidelity while maintaining a very high frame rate.
At 2560x1440, High settings at 148.8 FPS represent the best experience for most users, as it clears the 144 Hz threshold while offering substantial visual improvements over Medium's 196.1 FPS. Players with 240 Hz displays may prefer Medium settings to stay above 190 FPS. Ultra at 114.2 FPS remains playable but sacrifices the high-refresh-rate advantage.
For 3840x2160, High settings at 79.3 FPS are the recommended choice for a smooth experience on standard 60 Hz displays, with headroom above that baseline. Medium at 107 FPS provides a better balance for 100 Hz panels, while Ultra at 63.6 FPS is only suitable for slower displays or players prioritizing maximum visual quality over frame rate. Low settings at 131.6 FPS are viable for competitive play on high-refresh-rate 4K monitors, though the visual trade-offs are substantial.
The data indicates that the RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM is not a constraint at any tested setting, allowing the user to prioritize frame rate or visual quality based on personal preference.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 operates with a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, paired with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus. The memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s provides ample headroom for Palworld's asset streaming and large world rendering at all tested resolutions.
The GPU's synthetic benchmark results place it at the 94th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 84,306. In the measured game data, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rate drops from 131.6 FPS on Low to 63.6 FPS on Ultra, a 68 FPS reduction that clearly demonstrates the GPU's workload scaling with settings.
The RTX 5090's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power allows the system to maintain high frame rates even at 4K with High settings (79.3 FPS). The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, scores 84,241 with a 0.1% delta, indicating near-identical performance. The AMD Radeon PRO W6600 trails by 1.3%, while the NVIDIA CMP 40HX leads by 1.6% in synthetic benchmarks.
The data shows that the GPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p, where the CPU appears to cap performance. At 2560x1440 with Low settings, the system reaches 238.6 FPS, and at 1920x1080 with Low settings, 367.1 FPS. These numbers suggest that while the RTX 5090 is exceptionally fast, the Ryzen 5 7600X's single-thread performance becomes the primary constraint at lower resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution-dependent scaling that indicates a gradual shift in the bottleneck from CPU to GPU. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 367.1 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 reduces this to 238.6 FPS, a 35% drop. At 3840x2160, the frame rate falls to 131.6 FPS, another 45% reduction.
For High settings, the scaling is similar but less steep: 226.2 FPS at 1080p, 148.8 FPS at 1440p (34% drop), and 79.3 FPS at 4K (47% drop). The Ultra preset shows the most significant scaling: 174 FPS at 1080p, 114.2 FPS at 1440p (34% drop), and 63.6 FPS at 4K (44% drop).
The consistent ~34% drop from 1080p to 1440p across all settings suggests that the CPU is still partially involved at 1440p. However, the larger percentage drops from 1440p to 4K (44-47%) indicate the GPU is becoming the dominant constraint at higher resolutions. This interpretation is supported by the observation that the absolute frame rate differences between resolutions increase with higher settings, reflecting the GPU's growing workload.
The data also shows that at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 193.1 FPS (367.1 vs 174 FPS), while at 4K this difference narrows to 68 FPS (131.6 vs 63.6 FPS). This narrowing gap at 4K confirms that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, whereas the CPU's performance ceiling is more apparent at 1080p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce 367.1 FPS average, making it the fastest measured configuration. Medium settings follow at 293.6 FPS, which is 73.5 FPS lower than Low. High settings achieve 226.2 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 174 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 193.1 FPS, demonstrating significant CPU-bound performance at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show more GPU influence. Low settings average 238.6 FPS, which is 128.5 FPS lower than at 1080p. Medium settings produce 196.1 FPS, a 97.5 FPS reduction from 1080p. High settings reach 148.8 FPS, down 77.4 FPS from 1080p. Ultra settings average 114.2 FPS, which is 59.8 FPS lower than the 1080p result. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 124.4 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the GPU workload dominates. Low settings produce 131.6 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings average 107 FPS, a 24.6 FPS reduction from Low. High settings deliver 79.3 FPS, down 27.7 FPS from Medium. Ultra settings drop to 63.6 FPS, which is 15.7 FPS lower than High. The total spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 68 FPS, the smallest absolute difference across all resolutions.
The data reveals that the Ryzen 5 7600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient performance for Palworld's CPU demands at 1080p, as evidenced by the 367.1 FPS Low setting result. However, the gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution (193.1 FPS) suggests that the CPU cannot fully exploit the RTX 5090's capabilities when visual settings are increased. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with all settings producing frame rates that scale more predictably with the graphics workload.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 131.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 107.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 79.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 63.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 238.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 196.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 148.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 114.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 367.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 293.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 226.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 174.0 |
Palworld with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RTX 5090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.