Palworld
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 173 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 79 | 102 | 130 |
| 1440p QHD | 112 | 143 | 186 | 232 |
| 1080p Full HD | 169 | 221 | 288 | 353 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld at 1080p with the Ryzen 5 7600 and RTX 4090 is a high-refresh-rate showcase, with the Low preset hitting 353 FPS average. The data shows a clear and consistent scaling pattern as resolution climbs, with the Ultra preset at 4K being the only configuration that drops below the 60 FPS threshold, landing at 60.5 FPS average. The performance curve from 1080p to 4K reveals where each component's headroom runs out, and the settings choices have a massive impact on the playable experience.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a predictable decline as pixel count increases, but the magnitude of the drop varies significantly by preset. At the Low preset, the transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 reduces the average from 353 FPS to 231.8 FPS, a 34% drop, and then further to 129.6 FPS at 3840x2160, which is another 44% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep scaling at low settings indicates that the RTX 4090 is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the reduced CPU workload at Low settings allows the GPU to become the bottleneck earlier.
At the High preset, the scaling is less aggressive in relative terms. The 1080p average of 221.3 FPS drops to 143 FPS at 1440p (a 35% reduction) and then to 79.3 FPS at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). The Ultra preset follows a similar pattern, starting at 168.7 FPS at 1080p, falling to 112.2 FPS at 1440p, and bottoming out at 60.5 FPS at 4K. The fact that the 4K Ultra result is so close to 60 FPS suggests that this is the first point where the GPU's raw throughput is fully consumed, as the Zen 4 CPU has more than enough single-thread performance to feed the frame queue at lower resolutions.
The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at each resolution is telling. At 1080p, the difference is 184.3 FPS (353 vs 168.7), while at 4K the gap narrows to 69.1 FPS (129.6 vs 60.5). This compression of the preset delta at higher resolutions is classic GPU-bound behavior — when pixels are plentiful, the settings-driven shading cost matters less relative to the fixed cost of rasterization and memory bandwidth. For a 4K display, the data indicates that the RTX 4090's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient to avoid any capacity or bandwidth stalls, as the frame rate is still settings-dependent rather than hitting a hard memory wall.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p and 1440p displays, the Ultra preset is the clear choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing playability. The 1080p Ultra average of 168.7 FPS is well above any high-refresh monitor's needs, and the 1440p Ultra average of 112.2 FPS remains comfortably in the high-refresh territory. The step from Ultra to High at 1440p costs 31 FPS on average, which is a substantial visual quality gain for the performance hit, and the data shows no reason to drop below Ultra at these resolutions unless targeting a 240 Hz+ display at 1080p, where the High preset's 221.3 FPS might be preferable.
At 4K, the recommendation is more nuanced. The Ultra preset's 60.5 FPS average is technically playable but leaves no headroom for drops in busy scenes, which is a concern for a survival game with dynamic world events. The High preset at 79.3 FPS is the sweet spot for 4K, offering a 31% performance uplift over Ultra while likely maintaining most of the visual impact. The Medium preset at 101.9 FPS is the choice for players who prioritize smoothness above all else at 4K, but the data suggests that High is the best balance of frame rate and visual quality.
The Low preset is only recommended for competitive or high-refresh scenarios at 1080p, where the 353 FPS average can fully utilize a 360 Hz panel. At 1440p, the Low preset's 231.8 FPS is still extremely high, but the visual degradation is likely not worth the frame rate gain over Medium's 186 FPS for most players. The data shows that Medium at 4K (101.9 FPS) is a better experience than Low at 4K (129.6 FPS) for anyone who cares about image quality, as the gap between them is smaller in percentage terms than at lower resolutions.
GPU Role
The RTX 4090's specifications directly explain its dominance in this game's measured results. With a boost clock of 2520 MHz and 16384 shading units, the GPU can push 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is the raw horsepower needed to maintain high frame rates at 4K. The 24 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for Palworld's open-world streaming of textures and geometry. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the GPU does not appear to be memory-limited, as the frame rate scales predictably with settings rather than hitting a bandwidth wall.
The GPU's benchmark scores corroborate its gaming performance. The Passmark G3D score of 38194 places it in the 91st percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 66473 is within 1.3% of its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro P6000. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant since Palworld likely uses modern API features for its rendering. The RTX 4090's 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores are not directly measured in the FPS data, but their presence supports the card's ability to handle any future ray tracing or DLSS features without a significant performance penalty.
The GPU's power delivery is also a factor in sustained performance. The 450 W TDP and 850 W suggested PSU rating are high, but the triple-slot cooler design suggests the card can maintain its boost clocks under load without thermal throttling. The measured FPS numbers are consistent with a GPU that is running at its full potential, as there are no anomalous dips that would indicate clock instability or thermal issues.
FAQ
Q: Can the RTX 4090 run Palworld at 4K smoothly?
A: Yes, but only at High settings or lower. The data shows the 4K High preset averages 79.3 FPS, while the 4K Ultra preset drops to 60.5 FPS. For a locked 60 FPS experience with headroom, High is the recommended choice.
Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p 144 Hz monitor?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 delivers 112.2 FPS average, which is close to 144 Hz. If you want to fully saturate a 144 Hz panel, the High preset at 143 FPS is the exact match, though the visual difference between High and Ultra is likely minimal in practice.
Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?
A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 averages 353 FPS, which is 184.3 FPS higher than the Ultra preset's 168.7 FPS. This represents a 109% performance uplift, making Low the choice for extreme refresh rates.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7600 a bottleneck for the RTX 4090 in Palworld?
A: At 1080p and Low settings, the CPU may be a limiting factor, as the 353 FPS is near the practical limit for many CPUs. However, at higher resolutions and presets, the data shows the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as frame rates scale consistently with resolution.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Medium and High at 4K?
A: The 4K Medium preset averages 101.9 FPS, which is 22.6 FPS higher than the High preset's 79.3 FPS. The Medium preset offers a 28% performance advantage over High at 4K.
Q: Does the RTX 4090's 24 GB VRAM matter for Palworld?
A: The data does not show any VRAM-related performance cliffs, as the frame rates scale smoothly with resolution and settings. The 24 GB capacity and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for Palworld's needs, even at 4K Ultra.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600's specifications show why it pairs well with the RTX 4090 in Palworld. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, the CPU has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is critical for a game that likely has a primary simulation thread. The single-thread benchmark scores are strong: 3DMark single-thread score of 999, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3246, and Passmark single-thread score of 3910. These numbers indicate that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's frame generation at lower resolutions, though the 1080p Low result of 353 FPS suggests the CPU is being pushed to its limits.
The CPU's multi-threaded performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22992 and a 3DMark max threads score of 6503. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory throughput for the game's world streaming. The CPU's average benchmark score of 26617 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and it is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scoring 0.2% higher and the Intel Core i9-11900K scoring 0.3% higher.
The data suggests that at 4K, the CPU is not a bottleneck, as the frame rates are clearly GPU-limited. However, at 1080p Low, the 353 FPS average may be approaching the CPU's maximum frame generation capability. The 65 W TDP and 5 nm process node indicate efficient power delivery, which helps maintain boost clocks during long gaming sessions. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs reinforces that it is a high-end part capable of feeding the RTX 4090 in most scenarios.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured FPS across presets is: Low 353, Medium 287.8, High 221.3, and Ultra 168.7. The jump from Low to Medium costs 65.2 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 52.6 FPS, showing that the most expensive preset transition is from Low to Medium.
At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low 231.8, Medium 186, High 143, and Ultra 112.2. The relative deltas between presets are smaller than at 1080p, with the Low to Medium gap being 45.8 FPS and the High to Ultra gap being 30.8 FPS. This compression indicates the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor at 1440p.
At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low 129.6, Medium 101.9, High 79.3, and Ultra 60.5. The Low to Medium gap narrows to 27.7 FPS, and the High to Ultra gap is 18.8 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 60.5 FPS is the only measured configuration below 60 FPS, and it is just barely above that threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 4K for each preset shows a consistent 55-64% reduction in frame rate, which is expected for a 4x pixel count increase. The data confirms that Palworld is highly scalable across resolutions and settings, with the RTX 4090 providing playable performance even at the most demanding configuration.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 129.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 101.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 79.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 60.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 231.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 186.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 143.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 112.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 353.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 287.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 221.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 168.7 |
Palworld with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + RTX 4090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.