Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
94
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 94 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 43 56 70
1440p QHD 59 78 102 126
1080p Full HD 90 119 155 191

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 70
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 High 43
3840x2160 Ultra 33
2560x1440 Low 126
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Ultra 59
1920x1080 Low 191
1920x1080 Medium 155
1920x1080 High 119
1920x1080 Ultra 90

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld on the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combo delivers a playable experience across most settings, but the data clearly shows that resolution and preset choices have a dramatic impact on frame rates. The measured results indicate that the sweet spot for this pairing is 1440p with High settings, where the average FPS of 78 balances visual fidelity with smoothness. At 1080p, the combo is capable of very high frame rates, but the Ultra preset at 4K drops to an average of 33 FPS, which is below the threshold for a consistently fluid experience. The benchmark data, derived from measured rows, shows this system is best utilized at 1440p or 1080p, with High or Medium settings offering the most balanced performance.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy of performance across the four available presets: Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. For the best experience per the measured rows, the High preset at 2560x1440 stands out as the optimal choice. It delivers an average FPS of 78, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS target for most gamers, while still providing substantial visual improvements over Medium and Low. In contrast, the Ultra preset at the same resolution yields an average of 59 FPS, which is a marginal drop that may not justify the additional graphical load, especially considering that the High preset likely captures most of the visual benefits. At 1080p, High settings push the average to 119 FPS, making it an excellent option for high-refresh-rate monitors, while Medium at 1080p achieves 155 FPS and Low reaches 191 FPS, which are ideal for competitive play or if the user prioritizes maximum frame rates over visual quality.

For users with 4K displays, the data suggests that the Low preset is the only viable option for smooth gameplay, with an average of 70 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K averages 56 FPS, which is playable but shows worse minimums (48 FPS) that could lead to noticeable stutters in demanding scenes. High at 4K drops to 43 FPS, and Ultra falls to 33 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS standard and would likely feel sluggish. Therefore, the recommendation is to use High settings at 1440p as the primary configuration. If the user is on a 1080p panel, High or Medium are both excellent, with the choice depending on whether they prefer higher fidelity or higher frame rates. The data strongly suggests avoiding Ultra at any resolution, as the performance cost is steep; at 1440p it costs 19 FPS compared to High, and at 1080p it drops from 119 to 90 FPS. This indicates that the Ultra preset is not well-optimized for this hardware combination in Palworld, and the visual gains are unlikely to compensate for the significant frame rate reduction.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 plays a central role in determining Palworld’s performance, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large memory pool is beneficial for a game like Palworld, which features expansive open-world environments that can be demanding on VRAM. The benchmark results show that the GPU’s performance scales with resolution, but the frame rate drops are not linear, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K. For instance, at 1080p High the average is 119 FPS, but at 1440p High it falls to 78 FPS, and at 4K High it drops to 43 FPS. This pattern suggests that the RX 7700’s compute capabilities, which include 2560 shading units and a boost clock of 2459 MHz, are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but are stretched at 4K. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 25.18 TFLOPS, which is a solid figure, but Palworld’s engine appears to demand more from the GPU than the CPU at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s clock speeds, with a base of 1900 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz, contribute to its ability to handle the game’s rendering load. At 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, as evidenced by the high frame rates (191 FPS on Low). However, as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the average FPS drops accordingly. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the system can only muster 33 FPS, which is a clear indication that the RX 7700, while capable, is not a 4K Ultra-class card for this title. The GPU’s percentile ranking of 58 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852, places it in the mid-to-upper tier, but its nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with a deltaPct of -1.7%, show that it is not head-and-shoulders above its competition. The RX 7700’s performance in Palworld is therefore respectable but not exceptional, and users should moderate their expectations for 4K gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combos for Palworld, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks 1311 out of 2944 total combos. This places it in the 55th percentile (calculated from the rank and total), meaning that it outperforms a slight majority of other tested configurations. This is a solid middle-of-the-pack result, indicating that the system is well-balanced for the game but not a top-tier performer. The combo rank reflects the synergy between the CPU and GPU, and the data suggests that while neither component is the absolute best in its class, their combination yields a competent gaming experience. The Ryzen 5 3600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is a capable processor that ranks in the 71st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17035. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-11400 with a deltaPct of -0.2% and the Intel Core i7-1260P with a deltaPct of 0.2%, show that the CPU is competitive with other mid-range options.

The GPU, as mentioned, ranks in the 58th percentile, which is slightly lower than the CPU’s ranking. This suggests that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing, and that the CPU has some headroom to drive a more powerful graphics card. However, for Palworld specifically, the combo rank of 1311 indicates that the system performs as expected for its component tier. The fact that it sits just above the median of all tested combos means that there are many other systems that achieve higher frame rates, but also many that perform worse. This ranking is a useful reference for users considering this hardware, as it shows that they can expect a moderate level of performance that is neither disappointing nor outstanding. The data implies that to significantly improve Palworld performance, a GPU upgrade would be more beneficial than a CPU upgrade, given the GPU’s lower percentile ranking.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. Starting at 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest frame rates. On Low settings, the average FPS is 191, which is exceptional and indicates that the CPU and GPU are both capable of handling the game’s lighter loads with ease. Medium settings yield an average of 155 FPS, with a minimum of 131 FPS and a maximum of 178 FPS, showing good consistency. High settings drop the average to 119 FPS, which is still very smooth and suitable for most displays. Ultra settings, however, bring the average down to 90 FPS, which is a significant drop from High but still playable. The data shows that at 1080p, the system is never CPU-bound in a problematic way, as even the highest preset maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings average 126 FPS, which is still excellent for 1440p gaming. Medium settings average 102 FPS, with a minimum of 87 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS, indicating a stable experience. High settings reduce the average to 78 FPS, which is the recommended target for this resolution as it balances quality and smoothness. Ultra settings, however, fall to an average of 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold, and the lack of min/max data suggests it may be less consistent. This resolution is where the combo shows its best performance-to-visual ratio, as the High preset delivers a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while still looking good.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings are the only preset that averages above 60 FPS, with a mean of 70 FPS. Medium settings drop to an average of 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, showing that there are frame dips that could be noticeable. High settings average 43 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for many users, and Ultra settings average just 33 FPS, making the game feel quite sluggish. The data clearly shows that 4K is not a strong resolution for this combo in Palworld, and users with 4K displays should either lower the resolution or stick to Low settings. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 14 FPS, which is substantial, and the gap widens further at higher presets, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important information about the limiting component in this system. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 119. Dropping to 1440p High reduces the average to 78 FPS, a decrease of 41 FPS, or roughly 34%. Moving from 1440p to 4K High, the average falls to 43 FPS, a further decrease of 35 FPS, or about 45%. This pattern of diminishing returns indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is capable of maintaining high frame rates at 1080p, as evidenced by the 191 FPS on Low settings. However, as the resolution increases, the GPU’s rendering workload grows disproportionately, and the RX 7700 cannot keep up with the demand. The data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this scenario, as the frame rate drops are consistent with GPU-bound behavior.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K on Low settings shows a similar trend: 191 FPS at 1080p, 126 FPS at 1440p, and 70 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 44% drop from 1440p to 4K. These percentages are nearly identical to the High settings, which further confirms that the GPU is the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see less of a drop at higher resolutions, as the CPU load does not increase as much with resolution. Instead, the consistent percentage drops across different presets point to the GPU’s inability to handle the pixel count at 4K. The RX 7700’s 16 GB of VRAM is not the issue, as even at 4K Ultra, the memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s should be sufficient; rather, it is the GPU’s compute throughput that limits performance. The data indicates that for the best experience, users should stay at 1440p or below, as the GPU’s performance at 4K is not adequate for smooth gameplay at higher settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. It has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory. In Palworld, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI, which are typically single-threaded or lightly threaded tasks. The benchmark data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p, as the system achieves 191 FPS on Low settings, which is a very high frame rate. Even at 1440p Low, the average is 126 FPS, indicating that the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by a Geekbench single-core score of 1536 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2124, is adequate for Palworld, which does not seem to be heavily dependent on CPU performance.

However, the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are also relevant, as Palworld may use multiple cores for background tasks. The Ryzen 5 3600’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 4605 and Passmark multithread score of 17700 indicate that it is a competent multi-threaded processor, but its performance is comparable to rivals like the Intel Core i5-11400 (deltaPct of -0.2%) and the Intel Core i7-1260P (deltaPct of 0.2%). This means that the CPU is not a standout performer, but it is also not holding the system back in a significant way. The fact that the combo rank in Palworld is 1311 out of 2944 suggests that the CPU is performing its role adequately, and the overall performance is limited more by the GPU. If a user were to upgrade the CPU to a more powerful model, the frame rates at 1080p might increase slightly, but the gains would be minimal compared to upgrading the GPU. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W and 7 nm process node make it an efficient choice, and its release date of 2019 means it is a few years old, but it still holds its own in this game. The data indicates that for Palworld, the CPU is a stable foundation that does not require attention, as the GPU is the component that determines the overall experience.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4200 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2459 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 70.0
3840x2160 Medium 56.0
3840x2160 High 43.0
3840x2160 Ultra 33.0
2560x1440 Low 126.0
2560x1440 Medium 102.0
2560x1440 High 78.0
2560x1440 Ultra 59.0
1920x1080 Low 191.0
1920x1080 Medium 155.0
1920x1080 High 119.0
1920x1080 Ultra 90.0

Palworld with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RX 7700 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + RX 7700

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.