Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
129
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 129 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 62 77 98
1440p QHD 81 109 142 179
1080p Full HD 127 168 216 241

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 98
3840x2160 Medium 77
3840x2160 High 62
3840x2160 Ultra 47
2560x1440 Low 179
2560x1440 Medium 142
2560x1440 High 109
2560x1440 Ultra 81
1920x1080 Low 241
1920x1080 Medium 216
1920x1080 High 168
1920x1080 Ultra 127

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld pairs a six-core, twelve-thread AMD Ryzen 5 3600 with the Radeon RX 7900 XT, creating a combination that sits at rank 391 out of 1718 tested combos in this game. The data shows this is a capable pairing for Palworld, but the relationship between the CPU’s Zen 2 architecture and the GPU’s RDNA 3.0 design reveals distinct performance patterns across resolutions and settings. The measured frames per second range from a minimum of 47.2 at 4K Ultra to a maximum of 240.9 at 1080p Low, indicating a wide performance envelope that depends heavily on how the workload is configured.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 brings six cores and twelve threads to Palworld, running at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. This is a Zen 2 architecture part built on a 7 nm process, with a 65 W TDP and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. In the context of this game, the CPU’s multithreaded capabilities are moderate; its 3DMark max threads score is 4603, while the single-thread score is 696. This gap suggests Palworld does not heavily leverage more than a few cores, but the twelve threads still provide headroom for background tasks and game logic.

Benchmark results indicate the Ryzen 5 3600 sits at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18129. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-11400, which scores 18150, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the two are effectively tied. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 18101 (0.2% slower), while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 scores 18158 (-0.2% faster), and the AMD EPYC 9274F scores 18189 (-0.3% faster). This clustering shows the 3600 is exactly in the middle of its immediate competition, neither leading nor trailing by any meaningful margin.

In Palworld specifically, the CPU appears to be a limiting factor at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 240.9 FPS, which approaches the practical ceiling for many displays. However, when settings rise to High at 1080p, the frame rate drops to 167.5, and at Ultra it falls to 126.7. This pattern suggests that while the GPU is doing more work at higher settings, the CPU is still keeping pace without becoming a bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15045 and single-core score of 2124 further indicate a balanced processor that can handle Palworld’s demands without excelling in any particular area.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution and setting combination for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The data shows 1440p High delivers 109.2 FPS, which is a strong balance of visual quality and performance. At 4K High, the frame rate drops to 61.7, still playable but nearing the threshold where smoothness diminishes. For maximum frame rates, 1080p Low hits 240.9 FPS, but this sacrifices visual fidelity.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 3600 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-11400?

A: The two processors are statistically identical, with the Intel chip scoring 18150 and the AMD chip scoring 18129, a delta of -0.1%. This means in synthetic benchmarks, neither has a meaningful advantage, and in Palworld, the GPU will likely dominate performance differences.

Q: Does the RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB of VRAM matter for Palworld?

A: The 20 GB GDDR6 memory with 800.0 GB/s bandwidth is far more than Palworld requires at any tested setting. The largest frame rate drop between Medium and Ultra at 4K is from 77 to 47.2, which is more likely due to compute load than memory capacity, as the game does not appear to be VRAM-limited at these resolutions.

Q: What FPS can be expected at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average is 141.5 FPS. This is a significant jump from 4K Medium’s 77 FPS, showing that resolution scaling has a substantial impact on performance, with 1440p providing a smoother experience without the steep cost of 4K.

Q: Is the combo rank of 391 out of 1718 considered good?

A: Being in the top 23% of all tested combos suggests this pairing performs well above average for Palworld. However, the wide gap between the lowest and highest frame rates indicates that settings and resolution have a larger effect on the experience than the hardware combination itself.

Q: How does the GPU’s overall benchmark score position it against rivals?

A: The RX 7900 XT has an average benchmark score of 38358, placing it at the 82nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, scores 38349, a delta of 0%, while the NVIDIA CMP 70HX scores 38225 (0.3% slower) and the RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135 (0.6% slower). This indicates the 7900 XT is marginally ahead of its closest competitors.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution scaling that highlights the GPU as the primary limiter at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower ones. At 1080p High, the combo produces 167.5 FPS. Moving to 1440p High drops this to 109.2, a reduction of 58.3 FPS. At 4K High, the frame rate falls further to 61.7, another 47.5 FPS drop. This steep decline from 1080p to 4K is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload, where the RX 7900 XT’s compute units are increasingly taxed by pixel count.

The scaling from 1080p Low (240.9 FPS) to 1440p Low (178.6) and then to 4K Low (97.7) shows a similar trend but with a less aggressive drop. The percentage decrease from 1080p to 1440p is about 25.8%, while from 1440p to 4K it is about 45.3%. This non-linear scaling suggests that at 4K, the GPU is approaching its limits even at Low settings, whereas at 1080p, the CPU may be starting to hold back the GPU from reaching even higher frame rates.

The data implies that for this pairing, 1440p is the sweet spot where neither component is severely bottlenecked. At 1080p, the CPU’s twelve threads and moderate single-thread performance (696 in 3DMark single-thread) may prevent the GPU from fully stretching its legs, as evidenced by the 240.9 FPS ceiling at Low settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the clear constraint, with the CPU having ample headroom to spare.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 240.9 FPS, Medium reaches 216.4, High drops to 167.5, and Ultra falls to 126.7. The gap between Low and Ultra is 114.2 FPS, indicating that Palworld’s Ultra preset imposes a significant rendering load. The 1080p results show that even at Ultra, the frame rate remains well above 60 FPS, making this resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show a clear step down. Low settings hit 178.6 FPS, Medium drops to 141.5, High reaches 109.2, and Ultra falls to 81. The transition from High to Ultra at 1440p costs 28.2 FPS, which is a substantial penalty for the visual improvements Ultra provides. At this resolution, all settings maintain playable frame rates, with Low and Medium easily exceeding 140 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more demanding. Low settings still deliver 97.7 FPS, Medium drops to 77, High falls to 61.7, and Ultra bottoms out at 47.2. The Ultra result is the only configuration that dips below 60 FPS, making it borderline for smooth gameplay. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 50.5 FPS, showing that Palworld’s Ultra settings are particularly heavy at this resolution. Overall, the data indicates that 4K is viable for this combo but requires a careful choice of settings to maintain fluidity.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT achieves a rank of 391 out of 1718 tested combos in Palworld. This places the pairing in the top 22.8% of all configurations, which is a solid result given the CPU’s age relative to the GPU’s newer architecture. The rank suggests that while the RX 7900 XT is a high-end card (82nd percentile among GPUs), the Ryzen 5 3600’s 76th percentile standing does not drag the overall combo down significantly.

The data implies that the GPU is the dominant factor in this pairing’s ranking. The 7900 XT’s average benchmark score of 38358 is close to that of the RTX 5080 Mobile (38349) and well ahead of the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135), indicating the GPU is performing near the top of its class. In contrast, the CPU’s performance is middling, with rivals like the Ryzen 5 1600 (18158) and Core i5-11400 (18150) essentially matching it. This suggests that upgrading the CPU would likely improve the combo’s rank, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU has more influence.

However, the rank of 391 also reflects the game’s specific demands. Palworld is a survival game that may not be heavily multithreaded, so the 3600’s twelve threads are sufficient, and the single-thread performance (2124 in Cinebench R23) is adequate. The combo’s position in the middle of the pack among 1718 configurations indicates that many other pairings with similar or better CPUs and GPUs exist, but this specific match is far from a weak performer.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For players using this combo at 1920x1080, the High preset at 167.5 FPS offers the best experience, as it provides strong visual quality while staying well above the refresh rate of most monitors. Ultra at 126.7 FPS is also viable, but the 40.8 FPS penalty over High may not justify the graphical improvements, especially for competitive play. Low and Medium are unnecessary at this resolution given the high frame rates already achieved.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 109.2 FPS is the recommended choice, striking an excellent balance between fidelity and smoothness. Medium at 141.5 FPS is faster but sacrifices visual details, while Ultra at 81 FPS is still playable but incurs a 28.2 FPS drop from High. For users with 144 Hz monitors, High is the clear winner, as it stays above the refresh threshold with minimal compromise.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more nuanced. Medium at 77 FPS is the best option for maintaining a smooth experience, as it stays above 60 FPS while providing decent visuals. High at 61.7 FPS is borderline but acceptable for single-player games, while Low at 97.7 FPS is the choice for maximum smoothness but with noticeable visual downgrades. Ultra at 47.2 FPS should be avoided, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and may cause noticeable stutter. Overall, the data suggests that 1440p High is the optimal configuration for this hardware combo.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the dominant component in this pairing, featuring 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus with 800.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its boost clock is 2394 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz, and it contains 5376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, which is substantial for Palworld’s rendering demands. The 20 GB VRAM is far more than the game requires, as evidenced by the fact that even at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drop is more likely due to compute load than memory capacity.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its high-end status. It achieves a Passmark G3D score of 29009 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 169834, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 5080 Mobile, scores 38349, a delta of 0%, meaning the 7900 XT is effectively tied with it. The NVIDIA CMP 70HX is 0.3% slower, and the RTX 4080 Mobile is 0.6% slower, showing that the 7900 XT sits at the top of its immediate performance class.

In Palworld, the GPU’s role is most evident at 4K, where it becomes the primary bottleneck. The transition from 1440p High (109.2 FPS) to 4K High (61.7 FPS) represents a 43.5% drop, which aligns with the increased pixel count. The fact that 4K Low still produces 97.7 FPS indicates the GPU has enough raw power to handle the resolution at lower settings, but Ultra’s 47.2 FPS shows that the card’s limits are reached when combined with the game’s heaviest effects. Overall, the RX 7900 XT provides ample performance for Palworld, but users must balance resolution and settings to avoid dipping below 60 FPS.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4200 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

VRAM 20 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2394 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 97.7
3840x2160 Medium 77.0
3840x2160 High 61.7
3840x2160 Ultra 47.2
2560x1440 Low 178.6
2560x1440 Medium 141.5
2560x1440 High 109.2
2560x1440 Ultra 81.0
1920x1080 Low 240.9
1920x1080 Medium 216.4
1920x1080 High 167.5
1920x1080 Ultra 126.7

Palworld with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + RX 7900 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.