Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
96
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 96 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 71 77 123
1440p QHD 70 84 91 145
1080p Full HD 78 94 102 163

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 123
3840x2160 Medium 77
3840x2160 High 71
3840x2160 Ultra 59
2560x1440 Low 145
2560x1440 Medium 91
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Ultra 70
1920x1080 Low 163
1920x1080 Medium 102
1920x1080 High 94
1920x1080 Ultra 78

Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination ranks 1340th out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower, placing it in the 55th percentile of all systems evaluated. This mid-pack positioning suggests a balanced pairing that trades blows with a wide range of configurations, but it is far from the top-tier setups that dominate the leaderboard. The data shows a system that can handle the game comfortably at most settings, though it requires some compromise at the highest visual fidelity. The rank of 1340 indicates that while this combo is not exceptional, it sits comfortably above the median tested system, meaning the vast majority of players would find its performance acceptable for a smooth experience. The positioning is intriguing because the CPU and GPU both sit at respectable but not elite percentile rankings, which hints at a synergistic match where neither component drastically bottlenecks the other.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 brings 14 cores and 14 threads to the table, running at a base clock of 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This configuration is notable for its lack of hyper-threading—the 14 threads equal the core count—which is a design choice that prioritizes raw single-core performance over multi-threaded throughput. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46062, placing it just 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 0.1% below the Intel Core i9-13900HX. This tight clustering with rival chips indicates that the Ultra 5 235 is a solid performer that holds its own in synthetic workloads, but it does not blow past the competition. In Overpower, an action game that likely relies on draw calls and physics calculations, the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is the more relevant figure, as it allows the processor to rapidly process single-threaded game logic. The L3 cache of 24 MB shared across all cores provides a decent pool of fast memory for frequently accessed game data, though it is not exceptional by modern standards. The 3 nm process node from TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die suggests a dense, power-efficient design that can sustain high clocks without excessive heat, though the 65 W TDP means it is not a power-hungry part. For Overpower specifically, the CPU's 14 cores are likely more than sufficient, as most action games rarely scale beyond 8-12 threads, meaning the extra cores provide headroom for background tasks and streaming rather than directly boosting FPS. The single-core performance, evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 4516, is what likely drives the 1080p results, where the CPU has more influence over frame pacing.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the visual workhorse here, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth—a substantial amount that prevents memory bottlenecks at higher resolutions. The GPU clocks in with a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost of 2459 MHz, which are healthy frequencies for a mid-range card. With 2560 shading units and 40 ray tracing cores, it is equipped to handle modern rendering techniques, though its 58th percentile ranking against all GPUs (average benchmark score 15852) places it in the lower half of the performance spectrum. The nearest rival data shows it is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Radeon R9 370X (0.1% slower) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (1.1% faster), but notably 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. This positions the RX 7700 as a competent 1080p and 1440p card that can push 4K with settings tuned down. In Overpower, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset, as it allows the card to hold high-resolution textures without spilling into system memory, which would cause stutters. The 96 ROPs and 160 TMUs provide a solid fill rate, and the FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS gives the card enough compute for complex shaders. The GPU's 200 W TDP with a suggested 550 W PSU indicates it is not an efficiency champion, but the performance it delivers per watt is reasonable for its class. For Overpower's action sequences with particle effects and dynamic lighting, the RX 7700's 40 ray tracing cores can accelerate lighting calculations, though the game's engine likely relies more on rasterization, where the card's raw throughput shines.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent pattern across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 163 FPS on Low settings, 102 FPS on Medium, 94 FPS on High, and 78 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS, indicating a stable frame time with only minor dips. Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers drop to 145 FPS on Low, 91 FPS on Medium, 84 FPS on High, and 70 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 1440p has a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 104 FPS, showing that the system maintains playable frame rates even with the resolution increase. At 3840x2160, the performance takes a more significant hit: 123 FPS on Low, 77 FPS on Medium, 71 FPS on High, and 59 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Medium preset shows a minimum of 65 FPS and a maximum of 89 FPS, which is on the edge of smoothness for action games. The ultra-wide delta between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution is notable: at 1080p, the gap is 85 FPS (from 163 to 78), at 1440p it is 75 FPS (145 to 70), and at 4K it is 64 FPS (123 to 59). This shrinking delta at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor as pixel count increases, whereas at 1080p the CPU has more headroom to push higher frame rates. The data also shows that the step from Medium to High costs roughly 8-9 FPS at all resolutions, while the step from High to Ultra costs about 13-16 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset imposes a disproportionate performance penalty.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling analysis reveals how the system responds to increasing pixel counts. From 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 94 to 84, a decline of approximately 10.6%. From 1440p to 4K at High settings, the drop is from 84 to 71 FPS, a further 15.5% reduction. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings is from 94 to 71 FPS, a 24.5% decrease. At Low settings, the scaling is steeper: 163 FPS at 1080p falls to 145 FPS at 1440p (11% drop) and then to 123 FPS at 4K (15.2% drop), totaling a 24.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This pattern suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, as the percentage drops are relatively consistent across settings rather than being amplified by CPU limitations. The fact that the 1080p to 4K drop is almost identical (around 24-25%) at both Low and High settings indicates that the RX 7700's raw pixel-pushing capability is the limiting factor, not the CPU. At 1080p Low, the system hits 163 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's practical limit for this game, but the GPU still has headroom. At 4K Ultra, the 59 FPS average shows the GPU is fully saturated, and the CPU is waiting for frames. The data implies that for 4K gaming, users must accept a significant settings reduction to maintain high frame rates, while 1440p offers a sweet spot where the combo can deliver above 84 FPS on High settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset at 94 FPS provides a strong balance of visual quality and performance, as the jump to Ultra only adds marginal graphical improvements but costs 16 FPS. For players who prioritize competitive smoothness, the Medium preset at 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS ensures no drops below the 60 FPS threshold, making it a safer choice than High, which has no recorded minimum but could dip lower. At 2560x1440, the High preset at 84 FPS is the best recommendation, as it stays above 80 FPS while offering better visuals than Medium (91 FPS) which saves only 7 FPS. The Ultra preset at 70 FPS is playable but leaves little margin for demanding scenes. For 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 77 FPS (minimum 65 FPS) is the highest setting that maintains a stable experience above 60 FPS; the High preset at 71 FPS is tempting but the lack of a minimum FPS figure makes it riskier, and Ultra at 59 FPS dips below the 60 FPS target. The Low presets at all resolutions are unnecessary for this combo, as even at 4K it delivers 123 FPS, which exceeds most display refresh rates. The data suggests that the "High" preset is the sweet spot for 1080p and 1440p users, while 4K users should stick to "Medium" to guarantee smooth frame pacing.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested systems in Overpower?

A: This combination ranks 1340th out of 2980 tested combos, placing it in the 55th percentile of all systems evaluated for this game.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 100 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 163 FPS, and at Medium settings it hits 102 FPS. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset (145 FPS) exceeds 100 FPS, while Medium drops to 91 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game at any resolution?

A: The data indicates that at 1080p Low, the 163 FPS result is likely near the CPU's limit, as the GPU could push higher. However, at 4K Ultra with 59 FPS, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, showing a shift in bottleneck as resolution increases.

Q: What is the FPS difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 84 FPS, while Ultra averages 70 FPS, a difference of 14 FPS in favor of High settings.

Q: Is the RX 7700's 16 GB VRAM sufficient for this game?

A: The measured data shows no VRAM-related performance issues, as the card maintains consistent FPS across settings, and the 16 GB capacity is ample for the game's textures at all tested resolutions.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance affect 1080p results?

A: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4516 and boost clock of 5.00 GHz contribute to the 163 FPS at 1080p Low, which is the highest measured result, showing that strong single-core performance is key for high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2459 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 123.0
3840x2160 Medium 77.0
3840x2160 High 71.0
3840x2160 Ultra 59.0
2560x1440 Low 145.0
2560x1440 Medium 91.0
2560x1440 High 84.0
2560x1440 Ultra 70.0
1920x1080 Low 163.0
1920x1080 Medium 102.0
1920x1080 High 94.0
1920x1080 Ultra 78.0

Overpower with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RX 7700 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RX 7700

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.