Overpower

Overpower is an Action title released on 2023-08-14. The measured configuration is the Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, and the dataset covers average FPS at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 under Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings. The dataIsMeasured field marks these rows as measured rather than estimated.

Resolution Scaling

| Preset | 1920x1080 | 2560x1440 | 3840x2160 |

|:-------|----------:|----------:|----------:|

| Low | 289.1 | 269.7 | 226.5 |

| Medium | 187.1 | 167.9 | 144.8 |

| High | 175.2 | 154.5 | 133.2 |

| Ultra | 145.8 | 131 | 107.1 |

The first clear pattern is the ordering of presets at every resolution: Low is the fastest, Medium is next, High trails Medium, and Ultra is slowest. The resolution scaling pattern is stable within each preset. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 reduces the average FPS monotonically across all four settings. The effect is present, but it is not severe enough to push the system below a triple-digit average anywhere in the measured matrix. The lowest measured value is 107.1 at 3840x2160 Ultra.

The scaling data suggests that resolution is not the dominant limitation for this pairing. At 3840x2160 Low, the system still produces 226.5 FPS, which is higher than the 1920x1080 Ultra result of 145.8. That comparison is useful because it separates the cost of pixel count from the cost of preset effects. Resolution increases reduce FPS, but the preset shift from Low to Ultra reduces FPS even more at the same resolution. The 4K Low result of 226.5 also shows that the graphics hardware is far from exhausted when effects are light. The limiting component in this more constrained case is more likely to be the CPU or engine-level frame rate ceiling than raw GPU pixel throughput.

The pattern changes as settings rise. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average drops to 107.1, while at 2560x1440 Ultra it is 131 and at 1920x1080 Ultra it is 145.8. The progression from 145.8 to 131 to 107.1 is a steady decline, but the absolute values remain high. This indicates a system that can carry 4K Ultra comfortably while still leaving headroom for higher-refresh displays at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors and a 609 mm² die. Its base clock is 2235 MHz and its boost clock is 2520 MHz. The memory subsystem is 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, with 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The listed memory clock is 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective throughput. These are the resources available to the renderer at all measured settings.

The 24 GB frame buffer and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are relevant to the 4K results in particular. At 3840x2160, the GPU delivers 226.5 FPS on Low, 144.8 on Medium, 133.2 on High, and 107.1 on Ultra. The consistency across these settings suggests that memory capacity is not being exhausted at any of the measured presets. A smaller frame buffer would likely show a sharper collapse when moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160, but the measured rows do not exhibit such a collapse. Instead, the FPS decline is gradual and follows the increasing cost of the preset.

The GPU's synthetic profile is also strong. Its average benchmark score is 66,473, and it places at the 91st percentile among all GPUs. In PassMark G3D, it scores 38,194. The nearest rivals in average score are the NVIDIA Tesla T4 at 66,733 with a deltaPct of -0.4, the NVIDIA Tesla P40 at 66,127 with a deltaPct of 0.5, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 67,097 with a deltaPct of -0.9, and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 67,320 with a deltaPct of -1.3. These deltas are all within a narrow band, but the game-specific results are what matter for this entry. The RTX 4090 sustains high FPS across every measured preset, and even the heaviest setting remains above 107.1.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a Raptor Lake processor with 16 cores and 24 threads. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz and its boost clock is 5.40 GHz. The L3 cache is 30 MB shared, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L1 is 80 KB per core. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process, uses the Intel Socket 1700, and carries a TDP of 125 W. The CPU's measured benchmark scores show both high single-thread and high multithread performance: Cinebench R23 single-core is 5,505 and multicore is 39,000; 3DMark single-thread is 1,136 and max-threads is 12,412; PassMark single-thread is 4,333 and multithread is 45,887.

The CPU's role is easiest to see in the Low and Medium rows. At 1920x1080 Low, the system reaches 289.1 FPS, the highest average in the entire dataset. At 2560x1440 Low, it reaches 269.7, and at 3840x2160 Low it still produces 226.5. These are cases where GPU load is comparatively light, so the frame rate is more dependent on the CPU's ability to feed the renderer. The 5.40 GHz boost clock and 24 threads give this processor a strong foundation for that task. The 16 cores handle the game's main threads and background work, while the high boost clock helps with the single-threaded dependencies that games often present.

The synthetic ranking reinforces this position. The i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 47,282 and a percentile of 93 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13700KF at 47,334 with a deltaPct of -0.1, the AMD EPYC 4364P at 47,131 with a deltaPct of 0.3, the Intel Core i9-12900F at 47,081 with a deltaPct of 0.4, and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 at 47,527 with a deltaPct of -0.5. These differences are small in aggregate terms, but they show that the i7-13700K sits at the high end of the CPU field. In the game results, that translates into a configuration where the CPU is not the first component to limit frame rate.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows give a clear hierarchy: Low is fastest, Medium is slower than Low, High is slower than Medium, and Ultra is the slowest at every resolution. This ordering is identical across all three resolutions. Because no frame-time information or per-setting quality scoring is present, the recommendation is based on the measured average FPS plus the setting level.

Medium is the strongest measured preset for this pairing. It provides 187.1 FPS at 1920x1080, 167.9 FPS at 2560x1440, and 144.8 FPS at 3840x2160. These are the highest averages among the non-Low presets at every resolution. At 3840x2160, Medium's 144.8 FPS is above High's 133.2 and Ultra's 107.1. The same relationship holds at 2560x1440, where Medium is 167.9 FPS, High is 154.5 FPS, and Ultra is 131 FPS. At 1920x1080, Medium reaches 187.1 FPS, compared with 175.2 on High and 145.8 on Ultra.

High is not the best measured preset in this dataset. It is slower than Medium at every resolution, despite sitting above Medium in the typical settings ladder. This makes High difficult to recommend when Medium offers higher FPS in all measured rows. Ultra remains the highest visual setting, but it carries the largest measured cost. The 3840x2160 Ultra average of 107.1 is the lowest number in the entire table, which still qualifies as a playable result but is clearly the weakest measured configuration.

Low is the maximum smoothness option. At 3840x2160 Low, the system still produces 226.5 FPS, and at 1920x1080 Low it reaches 289.1. For users who prioritize frame rate over all other factors, Low is the data-backed choice. For a balance of visual quality and frame rate, Medium is the measured sweet spot.

How This Combo Ranks

In the game-specific ranking, the Intel Core i7-13700K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 places at rank 17 out of 1,744 tested combos. This is a very high placement within a large field of CPU and GPU pairings. The rank is more directly useful than synthetic aggregate scores because it is tied to this game's measured behavior rather than to generic workload results.

The rank is consistent with the high percentile values of both components. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile versus all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 91st percentile versus all GPUs. Both components sit near the top of their respective aggregate rankings, and the game-specific result matches that tier. The measured FPS matrix also supports the ranking: the lowest average in the entire set is 107.1, meaning every preset and resolution combination in this table stays above that level.

The synthetic nearest-rival data puts the component scores into context. The CPU's average score of 47,282 is close to the i7-13700KF at 47,334 and the EPYC 4364P at 47,131, with deltaPct values of -0.1 and 0.3. The GPU's average score of 66,473 is close to the Tesla T4 at 66,733 and the Tesla P40 at 66,127, with deltaPct values of -0.4 and 0.5. Those aggregate deltas are small, but the rank of 17 out of 1,744 is a larger separation in game terms. It places this combo at the front of the list, ahead of the large majority of tested systems, and the measured FPS data does not contradict that position.